free group factor
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2010 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. 707-713
Author(s):  
Liguang Wang ◽  
Xiujuan Ma

In this note, we consider the maximal subfactors of factors. We show that there is no maximal subfactor of type In factors when n is finite. We also consider the relation between maximal subfactor and Jones' basic construction. In the end, we give an example of an index 2 maximal subfactor in free group factor with 2 generators.


2010 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 787-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Cameron ◽  
Junsheng Fang ◽  
Mohan Ravichandran ◽  
Stuart White

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 741-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Houdayer

AbstractWe show that for any type III1free Araki–Woods factor$\mathcal{M}$=(HR, Ut)″ associated with an orthogonal representation(Ut)ofRon a separable real Hilbert spaceHR, the continuous coreM=$\mathcal{M}$⋊σRis a semisolid II∞factor, i.e. for any non-zero finite projectionq∈M, the II1factorqM qis semisolid. If the representation(Ut)is moreover assumed to be mixing, then we prove that the coreMis solid. As an application, we construct an example of a non-amenable solid II1factorNwith full fundamental group, i.e.$\mathcal{F}$(N) =R*+, which is not isomorphic to any interpolated free group factorL(Ft), for 1 <t≤ = +∞.


2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (08) ◽  
pp. 833-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARIA GRAZIA VIOLA

We define a ℤ3-kernel α on [Formula: see text] and a ℤ3-kernel β on the hyperfinite II 1 factor R, which have conjugate obstruction to lifting. Hence, α⊗β can be perturbed by an inner automorphism to produce an action γ on [Formula: see text]. The aim of this paper is to show that the factor [Formula: see text], which is similar to Connes's example of a II 1 factor non-antiisomorphic to itself, is the enveloping algebra of an inclusion of II 1 factors A⊂B. Here A is an interpolated free group factor and B is isomorphic to the crossed product A⋊θℤ9, where θ is a ℤ3-kernel of A with non-trivial obstruction to lifting. By using an argument due to Connes, which involves the invariant χ(ℳ), we show that ℳ is not anti-isomorphic to itself. Furthermore, we prove that for one of the generator of χ(ℳ), which we will denote by σ, the Jones invariant ϰ(σ) is equal to [Formula: see text].


2002 ◽  
Vol 355 (2) ◽  
pp. 465-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan M. Sinclair ◽  
Roger R. Smith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document