orthodox semigroups
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

80
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (34) ◽  
pp. 367-379
Author(s):  
Simon M. Goberstein
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHOUFENG WANG

As generalizations of inverse semigroups, Ehresmann semigroups are introduced by Lawson and investigated by many authors extensively in the literature. In particular, Lawson has proved that the category of Ehresmann semigroups and admissible morphisms is isomorphic to the category of Ehresmann categories and strongly ordered functors, which generalizes the well-known Ehresmann–Schein–Nambooripad (ESN) theorem for inverse semigroups. From a varietal perspective, Ehresmann semigroups are derived from reducts of inverse semigroups. In this paper, inspired by the approach of Jones [‘A common framework for restriction semigroups and regular $\ast$-semigroups’, J. Pure Appl. Algebra216 (2012), 618–632], Ehresmann semigroups are extended from a varietal perspective to pseudo-Ehresmann semigroups derived instead from reducts of regular semigroups with a multiplicative inverse transversal. Furthermore, motivated by the method used by Gould and Wang [‘Beyond orthodox semigroups’, J. Algebra368 (2012), 209–230], we introduce the notion of inductive pseudocategories over admissible quadruples by which pseudo-Ehresmann semigroups are described. More precisely, we show that the category of pseudo-Ehresmann semigroups and (2,1,1,1)-morphisms is isomorphic to the category of inductive pseudocategories over admissible quadruples and pseudofunctors. Our work not only generalizes the result of Lawson for Ehresmann semigroups but also produces a new approach to characterize regular semigroups with a multiplicative inverse transversal.


2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1132-1147
Author(s):  
Shoufeng Wang

Abstract As a generalization of the class of inverse semigroups, the class of Ehresmann semigroups is introduced by Lawson and investigated by many authors extensively in the literature. In particular, Gomes and Gould construct a fundamental Ehresmann semigroup CE from a semilattice E which plays for Ehresmann semigroups the role that TE plays for inverse semigroups, where TE is the Munn semigroup of a semilattice E. From a varietal perspective, Ehresmann semigroups are derived from reduction of inverse semigroups. In this paper, from varietal perspective Ehresmann semigroups are extended to generalized Ehresmann semigroups derived instead from normal orthodox semigroups (i.e. regular semigroups whose idempotents form normal bands) with an inverse transversal. We present here a semigroup C(I,Λ,E∘) from an admissible triple (I, Λ, E∘) that plays for generalized Ehresmann semigroups the role that CE from a semilattice E plays for Ehresmann semigroups. More precisely, we show that a semigroup is a fundamental generalized Ehresmann semigroup whose admissible triple is isomorphic to (I, Λ, E∘) if and only if it is (2,1,1,1)-isomorphic to a quasi-full (2,1,1,1)-subalgebra of C(I,Λ,E∘). Our results generalize and enrich some results of Fountain, Gomes and Gould on weakly E-hedges semigroups and Ehresmann semigroups.


2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Higgins
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-75
Author(s):  
PETER M. HIGGINS

AbstractWe augment the body of existing results on embedding finite semigroups of a certain type into 2-generator finite semigroups of the same type. The approach adopted applies to finite semigroups the idempotents of which form a band and also to finite orthodox semigroups.


2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ze Gu ◽  
Xilin Tang

AbstractIn this paper, we give some new characterizations of orthodox semigroups in terms of the set of inverses of idempotents. As a generalization, a new class of regular semigroups, namely V


2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 394-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangjun Kong ◽  
Fanwei Meng
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanhui Wang
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 406-412
Author(s):  
Roman Gigoń

In the paper we give some remarks on the article of Janet Mills. In particular, the proof of Lemma 1.2 (in her work) is incorrect, and so the proof of Theorem 3.5 is not valid, too. Using different methods we show the mentioned theorem. Moreover, we find a new equivalent condition to the statements in Theorem 3.5. In particular, an explicit definition of a new class of orthodox semigroups is introduced.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document