1174 The Reporting of Centre and Surgeon Experience in Studies of Robot Assisted Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review

Introduction Over 90% of cholecystectomies are performed using minimally invasive techniques. Robotic cholecystectomy (RC) has been developed to overcome technical limitations of laparoscopy, including improved range of movement and visualisation. Despite becoming increasingly widespread, the safety and efficacy of RC remain unestablished. This review aims to analyse the quality assurance reporting through centre and surgeon expertise in RC. Method A systematic search was conducted to identify all published studies reporting RC. Data on quality assurance measures were collected, including: centres involved, surgeons’ experience and training. Results Of the 1425 abstracts screened, 90 full-text papers were included. Sixty-four studies (71%) were single institutions. Of the thirty studies (33%) reporting centre type, 28 were conducted in specialist/regional/tertiary centres. Only four stated their caseload of RC. No studies described pre-specified criteria or minimum experience required for a surgeon to participate. Fifty-two (58%) reported the number of surgeons operating and 13 (14%) stated surgeons’ training grade. Two quantified previous RC experience, 7 stated prior laparoscopic experience. Only 21 (23%) described training prior to the surgeons’ first in-human procedure; animal based (n = 12), simulation (n = 12), observation (n = 4), lab-based (n = 3). Specific mentorship was reported in 8 studies, and 13 described dual operating. Conclusions Little information was provided about the experience and training of operating surgeons, making it difficult to ascertain whether replicable techniques were utilised which would allow development of a learning curve. This highlights the need for better transparency when reporting surgical innovation, to ensure the safe, evidence-based adoption of new technologies into clinical practice.

Minimally Invasive Approach to Gastric GISTs: Analysis of a Multicenter Robotic and Laparoscopic Experience with Literature Review

Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are most frequently located in the stomach. In the setting of a multidisciplinary approach, surgery represents the best therapeutic option, consisting mainly in a wedge gastric resection. (1) Materials and methods: Between January 2010 to September 2020, 105 patients with a primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GISTs) located in the stomach, underwent surgery at three surgical units. (2) Results: A multi-institutional analysis of minimally invasive series including 81 cases (36 laparoscopic and 45 robotic) from 3 referral centers was performed. Males were 35 (43.2%), the average age was 66.64 years old. ASA score ≥3 was 6 (13.3%) in the RS and 4 (11.1%) in the LS and the average tumor size was 4.4 cm. Most of the procedures were wedge resections (N = 76; 93.8%) and the main operative time was 151 min in the RS and 97 min in the LS. Conversion was necessary in five cases (6.2%). (3) Conclusions: Minimal invasive approaches for gastric GISTs performed in selected patients and experienced centers are safe. A robotic approach represents a useful option, especially for GISTs that are more than 5 cm, even located in unfavorable places.

The Artisential® Articulated Laparoscopic Forceps: A Dry Lab Study to Examine Dexterity and Learning Effects in Operators with Different Levels of Laparoscopic Experience

Purpose: The advent of robotic surgery has highlighted the advantages of articulation. This dry-lab study examined the dexterity and learning effect of a new articulated laparoscopic instrument: the ArtiSential® forceps (LIVSMED, Seongnam, Republic of Korea). Methods: A peg board task was designed. Three groups of volunteers with varying levels of laparoscopic expertise were organized to perform the task: expert, intermediate and novice. The participants performed the task using articulated and straight instruments, once before a 30-min training session and once afterwards. The times required to perform the task were recorded. The performances were analyzed and compared between the groups as well as between the straight and articulated instruments. Results: The experts were significantly faster than the novices with both instruments before the 30-min training session (p = 0.0317 for each instrument). No significant time difference was found among the three groups after the 30-min training session. The decrease in the time required to perform the peg-transfer task with the articulated instrument was significantly greater in the novice and intermediate groups (p = 0.0159 for each group). No significant difference in time reduction was observed between the groups with the straight instrument. Regardless of the user, the articulated device was associated with faster task performance than the straight device after 8 hours of training (p = 0.0039). Conclusion: The ArtiSential® articulated device can improve dexterity. A significantly greater learning effect was observed in the novice and intermediate groups in comparison with experts. A plateau in the learning curve was observed after a few hours of training.

INFLUENCE OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE LAPAROSCOPIC EXPERIENCE SKILLS ON ROBOTIC SURGERY DEXTERITY

ABSTRACT Background: It is unclear if there is a natural transition from laparoscopic to robotic surgery with transfer of abilities. Aim: To measure the performance and learning of basic robotic tasks in a simulator of individuals with different surgical background. Methods: Three groups were tested for robotic dexterity: a) experts in laparoscopic surgery (n=6); b) experts in open surgery (n=6); and c) non-medical subjects (n=4). All individuals were aged between 40-50 years. Five repetitions of four different simulated tasks were performed: spatial vision, bimanual coordination, hand-foot-eye coordination and motor skill. Results: Experts in laparoscopic surgery performed similar to non-medical individuals and better than experts in open surgery in three out of four tasks. All groups improved performance with repetition. Conclusion: Experts in laparoscopic surgery performed better than other groups but almost equally to non-medical individuals. Experts in open surgery had worst results. All groups improved performance with repetition.

Learning curve of surgical novices using the single-port platform SymphonX: minimizing OR trauma to only one 15-mm incision

Background Minimally invasive single-port surgery is always associated with large incisions up to 2–3 cm, complicated handling due to the lack of triangulation, and instrument crossing. The aim of this prospective study was to report how medical students without any laparoscopic experience perform several laparoscopic tasks (rope pass, paper cut, peg transfer, recapping, and needle threading) with the new SymphonX single-port platform and to examine the learning curves in comparison to the laparoscopic multi-port technique. Methods A set of 5 laparoscopic skill tests (Rope Pass, Paper cut, Peg Transfer, Recapping, Needle Thread) were performed with 3 repetitions. Medical students performed all tests with both standard laparoscopic instruments and the new platform. Time and errors were recorded. Results A total of 114 medical students (61 females) with a median age of 23 years completed the study. All subjects were able to perform the skill tests with both standard laparoscopic multi-port and the single-port laparoscopic system and were able to significantly improve their performance over the three trials for all five tasks—rope pass (p < 0.001), paper cut (p < 0.001), peg transfer (p < 0.001), needle threading (p < 0.001), and recapping (p < 0.001). In 3 out of 5 tasks, medical students performed the tasks faster using the standard multi-port system—rope pass (p < 0.001), paper cut (p < 0.001), and peg transfer (p < 0.001). In the task recapping, medical students performed the task faster using the new single-port system (p = 0.003). In the task needle threading, there was no significant difference between the standard multi-port system and the new single-port system (p > 0.05). Conclusion This is the first study analyzing learning curves of the commercially available SymphonX platform for abdominal laparoscopic surgery when used by novices. The learning curve and the error rate are promising.

Safety of Direct Trocar Entry in Laparoscopy in a Structured Fellowship Programme

Introduction:The best method of primary trocar insertion in laparoscopy remains controversial. There are advocates for both initial Veress needle insertion as well as direct trocar insertion.Aim of the study: This study was carried out to find out the complication rate of direct trocar insertion as a method of laparoscopic entry and find out the learning curve of trainees in a structured fellowship programme.Methodology: Retrospective analysis was done over period of 5 years with a sample size of 2053 subjects.Results: 2053 laparoscopic surgeries were examined. Overall complication rate was 0.38%; subjects with previous abdominal surgery were found to have higher complication rate as compared to ones with no history of prior surgery. [0.46% and 0.35% respectively]. All trainees gained reasonable degree of confidence within 6 months.Conclusion: Direct trocar insertion is a safe method of laparoscopic entry, which can be taught to trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience, without an increase in entry complications.International Journal of Human and Health Sciences Vol. 04 No. 01 January’20 Page : 51-54