Contributions of cholinergic receptor muscarinic 1 and CYP1A2 gene variants on the effects of plasma ratio of clozapine/N-desmethylclozapine on working memory in schizophrenia

Background: Clozapine has heterogenous efficacy in enhancing working memory in schizophrenia. We have previously hypothesized that this is due to opposing effects of clozapine and its metabolite, N-desmethylclozapine, at the muscarinic M1 receptor and demonstrated that a lower clozapine/ N-desmethylclozapine ratio is associated with better working memory than clozapine or N-desmethylclozapine levels alone. Aims: In this study, we expanded the above hypothesis to explore whether genetic variation in the cholinergic receptor muscarinic 1 gene, encoding the M1 receptor, affects the relationship between clozapine/ N-desmethylclozapine and working memory. Further, we explored whether CYP1A2 gene variants affect the ratio of clozapine/ N-desmethylclozapine and by this, working memory performance. Methods: We evaluated two functionally significant single nucleotide polymorphisms, rs1942499 and rs2075748, in cholinergic receptor muscarinic 1, with the haplotype T-A associated with lower transcriptional activity than the haplotype C-G. Further, we examined CYP1A2 *1F, with *1F/*1F conferring high inducibility in the presence of smoking. Results: In a sample of 30 patients with schizophrenia on clozapine monotherapy, clozapine/ N-desmethylclozapine was correlated with working memory only in non-carriers of the haplotype T-A of the cholinergic receptor muscarinic 1 gene. Interaction of CYP1A2 genotype and smoking status significantly affected clozapine concentrations, but there were no significant effects of CYP1A2 genotype and smoking status on the relationship between clozapine/ N-desmethylclozapine on working memory. Conclusions: Our finding that the relationship between clozapine/ N-desmethylclozapine and working memory is specific to patients with potentially higher transcription of M1 receptor (i.e. non-carriers of the haplotype T-A of cholinergic receptor muscarinic 1) supports a cholinergic mechanism underlying this relationship.

Long-term coffee consumption, caffeine metabolism genetics, and risk of cardiovascular disease: a prospective analysis of up to 347,077 individuals and 8368 cases

ABSTRACT Background Coffee is one of the most widely consumed stimulants worldwide and is generally considered to be safe or even beneficial for health. However, increased risk of myocardial infarction and hypertension has been suggested for individuals who carry a functional variant at cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), which makes them less effective at metabolizing caffeine. Objectives The aim of this study was to examine if the CYP1A2 genotype or a genetic score for caffeine metabolism (caffeine-GS) modifies the association between habitual coffee consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods Genetic data and information on habitual coffee intake and relevant covariates were available for 347,077 individuals in the UK Biobank, including 8368 incident CVD cases. We used logistic regression to test for the association between coffee intake and CVD risk, and whether the association varies with CYP1A2 genotype or caffeine-GS. Results The association between habitual coffee intake and CVD risk was nonlinear, and, compared with participants drinking 1–2 cups/day, the risk of CVD was elevated for nondrinkers, drinkers of decaffeinated coffee, and those who reported drinking >6 cups/day (increase in odds by 11%, 7%, and 22%, respectively, P-curvature = 0.013). CYP1A2 genotype and caffeine-GS were not associated with CVD (P ≥ 0.22 for all comparisons). There was no evidence for an interaction between the CYP1A2 genotype or caffeine-GS and coffee intake with respect to risk of CVD (P ≥ 0.53). Conclusions Heavy coffee consumption was associated with a modest increase in CVD risk, but this association was unaffected by genetic variants influencing caffeine metabolism.

Polymorphisms in CYP1A2, CYP2C9 and ABCB1 affect agomelatine pharmacokinetics

Background: Agomelatine is an agonist of the melatoninergic receptors used for the treatment of depression. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of genetic polymorphisms in metabolising enzymes and the P-glycoprotein transporter on agomelatine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Methods: Twenty-eight healthy volunteers receiving a single 25 mg oral dose of agomelatine, were genotyped for nine polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 enzymes ( CYP1A2, CYP2C9 and CYP2C19) and adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette subfamily B member 1 ( ABCB1), by real-time polymerase chain reaction . Agomelatine concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to a tandem mass spectrometry detector. Results: We calculated a CYP1A2 activity score that was directly correlated with agomelatine pharmacokinetics. Individuals with a decreased enzyme activity (*1C carriers) had a lower clearance and accumulated higher concentrations of agomelatine. In contrast, individuals with a high CYP1A2 inducibility (*1F or *1B carriers) showed an extensive clearance and lower agomelatine concentrations. The apparently marked differences between races were due to the different CYP1A2 genotype distribution. CYP2C9 intermediate/poor metabolisers showed a higher area under the concentration-time curve and maximum concentration. ABCB1 G2677T/A polymorphism affected the time to reach maximum concentration, as subjects carrying A/A+A/T genotypes showed higher values. No association was found for CYP2C19 phenotype. Agomelatine did not produce any change in blood pressure, heart rate or QT interval. Conclusions: CYP1A2 polymorphisms affect agomelatine pharmacokinetics. CYP1A2 phenotype inferred from the genotyping of CYP1A2*1C, *1F and *1B alleles might be a potential predictor of agomelatine exposure. ABCB1 G2677T/A could affect agomelatine absorption, as subjects with A/A+A/T genotypes had lower agomelatine concentration and they take more time to reach the maximum concentration.