Left atrial function by speckle tracking echocardography in HFpEF v1

AIMS. None of the conventional echocardiographic parameters alone predict increased NTproBNP level and symptoms, making diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) very difficult in some cases, in resting condition. We will evaluate LA functions by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) on top of conventional parameters in HFpEF and preHF patients with diastolic dysfunction (DD), in order to establish the added value of the LA deformation parameters in the diagnosis of HFpEF. METHODS. We will enroll patients with HFpEF and compare them with asymptomatic patients with similar risk factors with DD (preHF). We will evaluate them by NTproBNP, conventional DD parameters, and STE. Global longitudinal strain (GS) was added. LA reservoir (R), conduit (C), and pump function (CT) were assessed both by volumetric and STE. 2 reservoir strain (S) derived indices were also measured, stiffness (SI) and distensibility index (DI).

Laboratory indicators of pathological changes in patients with chronic heart failure with metabolic syndrome

The presence of metabolic syndrome (MS) significantly increases the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases that lead to chronic heart failure (CHF). The values of NT-proBNP, ST-2, and CRP markers and their mutual correlations were studied in 37 patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) without metabolic syndrome (MS) (group 1) and 37 patients with CHF with MS (group 2). The aim of the study was to determine the features of their changes in patients with CHF complicated by MS, and to rank patients by assigning a rank value to the values of NTproBNP, ST2, and CRP concentrations. The average ST2 level was 51±24 ng/ml in group 1 and 62±27 ng/ml in group 2. The average values of CRP in group 1 were 23.1±5.3 mg/l, in group 2-33.0±4.4 mg/l (p<0.05). The NTproBNP level was 2413±1586 PG/ml and 2721±1635 PG/ml in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Correlations between the values of NTproBNP and ST2, NTproBNP and CRP were demonstrated. In the group of CHF with MS, compared with the group of CHF, there were significantly more patients with the most pronounced pathological levels of damage markers: the number of patients with a General rank of 6-9 in the group of CHF with MS was 59%, in the group of CHF without MS-38% (p<0.05). Of the 18 patients who died, 17 were among those who had an overall rank of 6 to 9, only 1 patient who died after hospitalization had an overall rank of 5. At the same time, among 22 patients who had improved CHF in the outcome of hospitalization, 18 patients had a total rank from 0 to 5, and in 4 patients of this category, the clinical manifestations of CHF remained virtually unchanged. The results of ranking the level of the studied laboratory markers indicate that they can be used as a predictor of various outcomes of CHF.

Treatment of HIV-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension: single-center experience

Introduction Currently there is no evidence-based strategy for PAH drug application adjusted for patients with HIV-associated PAH. Data regarding the use of sildenafil and endothelin receptors antagonists (ERA) are limited case series. Purpose To present the long-term data on treatment with sildenafil, macitentan and ambrisentan in pts with HIV-PAH. Material and methods In prospective study were consecutively enrolled 18 treatment-naïve pts with HIV-PAH (7 males, 34.5 yrs; 29; 53 yrs), mean follow-up was 1.64yrs; 0,16–59–9.28 yrs. 4 pts were in IV FC, 5-III FC and 9 in II FC PAH (WHO). RHC, ECHO, 6MWT, ergospirometry and NTproBNP level were evaluated at a baseline. Intravenous drug abuse reported in 72% pts, all of them were co-infected with hepatitis. Nine pts (50%) treated with HAART therapy at a baseline. Five pts did not have PAH-specific therapy, 11 pts received sildenafil, 1 IV FC PAH pt with HAART – sildenafil+macitentan and 1 III FC PAH pt with HAART-sildenafil+ambrisentan. Follow-up data (FC, 6MWT, ECHO, ergospirometry, NT-proBNP) were available for 8 PAH-treated pts. Results Pts on PAH therapy had achieved improvement in 6 MWT with mean distance increase 69.3±52 m (p=0.01); NTproBNP level decrease (p=0.018) and FC PAH improvement in 7 pts. In pts with PAH therapy the size of right atrium decreased (56.4±7.8 vs 47.8±6.7 mm, p=0.027). The combinations of sildenafil and macitentan and sildenafil with ambrisentan were well tolerated and resulted 6MWT increase, low NTproBNP and FC improvement. Nevertheless there was no significant changes in peak VO2 consumption. Two pts with sildenafil therapy lost for follow up. Three pts with sildenafil but without HAART therapy dead: in one case due to pneumonia, other 2 cases due to pulmonary embolism. Four pts without HAART and PAH therapy dead. In our population strong association between survival and HAART therapy presence was revealed (p=0.01). Conclusion No adverse reactions of PAH-specific therapy were reported in pts on HAART. PAH therapy had a positive influence on FC, exercise capacity, heart remodeling and NT-proBNP level. There were no deaths in pts who receive HAART and PAH therapy. Nevertheless in our population strong association between survival and HAART therapy presence was revealed. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

The Value of NT-proBNP the Follow - up of Children with Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Objectives: To survery the plasma NT-proBNP concentration, the correlation between NT-proBNP concentration and the New York Pediatric Heart Failure Index (NYU PHFI) in children with dilated cardiomyopathy. Comment on the association of NT-proBNP with the level of left ventricular dilatation and systolic function in the follow - up of children with dilated cardiomyopathy. Method: Prospective, descriptive study. Results: At the time of diagnosis, 32 out of 33 patients (97%) had an NTproBNP level higher than 97,5th percentile. The log NT-proBNP was significantly positively correlated with PHFI (r = 0.84; P <0.001). The log NT-proBNP wasalso positively correlated with LVED (r = 0.519; p <0.001), was negatively correlated with LVEF (r = -0.736; p <0.001) and LVFS (r = - 0.737; p <0.001. The initial levels of serum NT-proBNP were not different from three progressed groups. However, at 3 months after diagnosis, the NT-proBNP of the improved group was significantly different from each other. Conclusion: NT-proBNP is an excellentbiomarker used to diagnose and assess cardiac insufficiency inthe follow – up of children with dilated cardiomyopathy.

Which Functional Classification Scale is Optimal for Children with Pulmonary Hypertension (PAH)?

Functional status assessed by the WHO-FC scale derived from adults is a known prognostic factor for pulmonary hypertension. Data on the usefulness of the Panama-FC scale in assessing children with pulmonary hypertension are limited. The study was performed to compare functional status results (WHO-FC and Panama-FC) and to assess the usefulness of these scales in various clinical situations. The reliability of the Panama-FC questionnaire method for facilitating patient evaluation was also examined. 26 functional status assessments (7 in disease progression/after treatment intensification) in both scales were analyzed in 19 patients with PAH confirmed in RHC. WHO-FC, Panama-FC scales, and questionnaire-based on Panama-FC were conducted independently by three different physicians. Results of assessments were compared with each other and with 6MWD, NTproBNP level, and echo parameters (TAPSE, RV/LV ratio). The Panama-FC scale results obtained using the medical interview method and questionnaire did not differ. Both WHO-FC and Panama-FC classes well-reflected disease advancement confirmed by non-invasive parameters (NTproBNP, 6MWD, TAPSE, RV/LV ratio). Differences between grading the class in both scales were observed: 5pts were classified to II (Panama-FC) vs I (WHO-FC), 2pts were in lower risk group in WHO-FC (II) vs Panama (IIIa). Worsening or improvement after treatment intensification in functional status in both scales was connected with the significant change of NTproBNP level. The 6-min walking distance did not change. TAPSE, RV/LV ratio changed significantly in 3pts with IPAH, accordingly to change in WHO-FC and Panama-FC. WHO-FC and Panama-FC well reflect the disease advancement. The questionnaire method simplified the use of the Panama-FC scale. The Panama-FC scale appears to be better for assessing functional status during long-term follow-up, while the WHO-FC scale was more useful in short-term treatment monitoring.