Survival of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Short-to-long-term Follow-ups: Meta-analysis

BackgroundThe effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty by lateral UKA remains poorly characterized as a limit of lateral UKA were operated for osteoarthritis (OA). However, the field of UKA surgery has rapidly expanded the usage of partly knee replacement in KOA patients with increased satisfaction, survivorship and functional outcomes. Methods A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the survivorship of lateral UKA with assessment with short-to midterm (<10years) and long-term (>10years) follow-up. Five databases were searched for eligible studies with search terms modified to the instructions of different databases. Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria and the pooling data were summarized in forest plots.ResultsThe implant survivorship of lateral UKA in short-term (3 year) was 96% (95%CI, 0.95-0.97, P<0.001), mid-term (5 year) 95% (0.93-0.96, P<0.001), long-term (10 year) 89% (0.85-0.93, P<0.001), and 15 year (85.5%, 0.79-0.92, P<0.001). Sensitivity and subgroup analysis was conducted for potential source of heterogeneity. ConclusionLateral UKA is a promising method of 90% survivorship over a short- to long-term follow up. Lateral UKA is a viable option in primary treatment of OA.

Robotic Arm-Assisted Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: How Are Components Aligned?

The purpose of this multicenter, retrospective, observational study was to investigate the association between intraoperative component positioning and soft tissue balancing, as reported by robotic technology for a cohort of patients who received robotic arm-assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) as well as short-term clinical follow-up of these patients. Between 2013 and 2016, 78 patients (79 knees) underwent robotic arm-assisted lateral UKAs at two centers. Pre- and postoperatively, patients were administered the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) and the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12). Clinical results were dichotomized based upon KOOS and FJS-12 scores into either excellent or fair outcome, considering excellent KOOS and FJS-12 to be greater than or equal to 90. Intraoperative, postimplantation robotic data relative to computed tomography-based components placement were collected and classified. Following exclusions and loss to follow-up, a total of 74 subjects (75 knees) who received robotic arm-assisted lateral UKAs were taken into account with an average follow-up of 36.3 months (range: 25.0–54.2 months) postoperative. Of these, 66 patients (67 knees) were included in the clinical outcome analysis. All postoperative clinical scores showed significant improvement compared with the preoperative evaluation. No association was reported between three-dimensional component positioning and soft tissue balancing throughout knee range of motion with overall KOOS, KOOS subscales, and FJS-12 scores. Lateral UKA three-dimensional placement does not seem to affect short-term clinical performance. However, precise boundaries for lateral UKA positioning and balancing should be taken into account. Robotic assistance allows surgeons to acquire real-time information regarding implant alignment and soft tissue balancing.

Preoperative Condition of the Patellofemoral Joint Does Not Negatively Impact Surgical Outcomes of Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in the Short Term

The relationship between patellofemoral joint (PFJ) degeneration and clinical outcomes following lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has not been well described thus far. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the preoperative PFJ condition and postoperative outcomes and the changes in lower-limb and PFJ alignment after lateral UKA. This was a retrospective study including 54 patients (mean age 72.9 years) who underwent lateral UKA for isolated lateral knee osteoarthritis at our institution between March 2013 and January 2019. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Knee Society Score-Knee (KSSK), and Knee Society Score-Function (KSSF), the degree of degeneration, tilting angle and lateral shift of the PFJ, and the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. The average follow-up period was 2.8 (range 1–6.1) years. There was a significant improvement in the OKS, KSSK, and KSSF after lateral UKA. Preoperative degeneration of the PFJ did not correlate with the recovery of clinical scores. The degeneration, tilting angle, and lateral shift of the PFJ did not significantly progress following lateral UKA. The HKA was improved after lateral UKA, and there was no correlation between the HKA change and PFJ condition. Postoperative severe valgus knee alignment was associated with a greater tilting angle. Preoperative degeneration of the PFJ did not have a negative impact on postoperative outcomes, and no short-term changes in the degeneration, tilting angle, and lateral shift of the PFJ were observed. Correction of knee-joint alignment did not have a negative impact on the condition of the PFJ.

What is the impact of patellofemoral joint degeneration and malalignment on patient-reported outcomes after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Aims It remains controversial whether patellofemoral joint pathology is a contraindication to lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative radiological degenerative changes and alignment on patient-reported outcome scores (PROMs) after lateral UKA. Secondarily, the influence of lateral UKA on the alignment of the patellofemoral joint was studied. Methods A consecutive series of patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted fixed-bearing lateral UKA with at least two-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological evaluation was conducted to obtain a Kellgren Lawrence (KL) grade, an Altman score, and alignment measurements for each knee. Postoperative PROMs were assessed using the Kujala (Anterior Knee Pain Scale) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), and satisfaction levels. Results A total of 140 knees (130 patients) were identified for analysis. At mean 4.1 years (2.0 to 8.5) follow-up, good to excellent Kujala scores were reported. The presence of mild to moderate preoperative patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis had no impact on these scores (KL grade 0 vs 1 to 3, p = 0.203; grade 0 to 1 vs 2 to 3, p = 0.674). Comparable scores were reported by patients with osteoarthritis (Altman score of ≥ 2) evident on either the medial or lateral patellofemoral joint facet (medial, p = 0.600 and lateral, p = 0.950). Patients with abnormal patellar congruence and tilt angles (≥ 17° and ≥ 14°, respectively) reported good to excellent Kujala scores. Furthermore, lateral UKA resulted in improvements to patellofemoral alignment. Conclusion This is the first study demonstrating that mild to moderate preoperative radiological degenerative changes and malalignment of the patellofemoral joint are not associated with poor patient-reported outcomes at mid-term follow-up after lateral fixed-bearing UKA. Our data suggest that this may be explained by realignment of the patella and thereby redistribution of loads across the patellofemoral joint. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6):727–735.

Mid-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty

Aims Limited evidence is available on mid-term outcomes of robotic-arm assisted (RA) partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate mid-term survivorship, modes of failure, and patient-reported outcomes of RA PKA. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent RA PKA between June 2007 and August 2016 was performed. Patients received a fixed-bearing medial or lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA), or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BiKA; PFA plus medial UKA). All patients completed a questionnaire regarding revision surgery, reoperations, and level of satisfaction. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were assessed using the KOOS for Joint Replacement Junior survey. Results Mean follow-up was 4.7 years (2.0 to 10.8). Five-year survivorship of medial UKA (n = 802), lateral UKA (n = 171), and PFA/BiKA (n = 35/10) was 97.8%, 97.7%, and 93.3%, respectively. Component loosening and progression of osteoarthritis (OA) were the most common reasons for revision. Mean KOOS scores after medial UKA, lateral UKA, and PFA/BiKA were 84.3 (SD 15.9), 85.6 (SD 14.3), and 78.2 (SD 14.2), respectively. The vast majority of the patients reported high satisfaction levels after RA PKA. Subgroup analyses suggested tibial component design, body mass index (BMI), and age affects RA PKA outcomes. Five-year survivorship was 98.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 97.2 to 99.5) for onlay medial UKA (n = 742) and 99.1% (95% CI 97.9 to 100) for onlay medial UKA in patients with a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (n = 479). Conclusion This large single-surgeon study showed high mid-term survivorship, satisfaction levels, and functional outcomes in RA UKA using metal-backed tibial onlay components. In addition, favourable results were reported in RA PFA and BiKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(1):108–116

Navigated lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty — Technique and case report

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) outcomes have been inferior to those described after medial UKA. Inaccurate implant positioning and mechanical axis malalignment appear to be the most common technical errors. Rare studies or failure identification on lateral UKA are currently presented in the literature. We describe the utilization of computer-assisted lateral UKA placement for lateral knee osteoarthritis with a valgus malalignment of 10°. Navigation allows for a dynamic intraoperative visualisation of the mechanical axis, as well as for accurate component positioning and overall postoperative limb alignment. The systems allow the knee position to be captured with appropriate tension in extension and flexion prior to making definite cuts. Postoperatively, no instabilities occurred with a precise component placement. Navigation can be used in rare cases for lateral UKA.