Difference in the joint space of the medial knee compartment between full extension and Rosenberg weight-bearing radiographs

Objectives Radiographs are the most widespread imaging tool for diagnosing osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Our purpose was to determine which of the two factors, medial meniscus extrusion (MME) or cartilage thickness, had a greater effect on the difference in the minimum joint space width (mJSW) at the medial compartment between the extension anteroposterior view (extension view) and the 45° flexion posteroanterior view (Rosenberg view). Methods The subjects were 546 participants (more than 50 females and 50 males in their 30 s, 40 s, 50 s, 60 s, and 70 s) in the Kanagawa Knee Study. The mJSW at the medial compartment was measured from both the extension and the Rosenberg views, and the “mJSW difference” was defined as the mJSW in the Rosenberg view subtracted from the mJSW in the extension view. The cartilage region was automatically extracted from MRI data and constructed in three dimensions. The medial region of the femorotibial joint cartilage was divided into 18 subregions, and the cartilage thickness in each subregion was determined. The MME was also measured from MRI data. Results The mJSW difference and cartilage thickness were significantly correlated at 4 subregions, with 0.248 as the highest absolute value of the correlation coefficient. The mJSW difference and MME were also significantly correlated, with a significantly higher correlation coefficient (0.547) than for the mJSW difference and cartilage thickness. Conclusions The MME had a greater effect than cartilage thickness on the difference between the mJSW at the medial compartment in the extension view and in the Rosenberg view. Key Points • The difference in the width at the medial compartment of the knee between the extension and the flexion radiographic views was more affected by medial meniscus extrusion than by cartilage thickness.

Greater Medial Meniscus Extrusion Seen on Ultrasonography Indicates the Risk of Posterior Root Tear in Non-radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis Population

Purpose: To elucidate the association between medial meniscus extrusion measured on ultrasonography (MMEUS) and the prevalence of medial meniscus posterior root tear detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MMPRTMRI). Methods: We recruited 127 patients (135 knees) in this cross-sectional study. All participants had medial knee pain without a knee trauma or surgery history. Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) severity was evaluated using Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KLG) scores. Patients with KLG scores 0-1 and ≥2 were classified in non-radiographic (non-ROA) and radiographic KOA (ROA) groups, respectively. MMEUS was measured with patients in the supine position. Based on T2*-weighted images, MMPRTMRI was defined as the presence of “Ghost meniscus sign” and “Creft/truncation sign”, indicating an abnormal high signal intensity of a disrupted posterior root. MMEUS was compared between MMPRT+ and MMPRT– patients using a non-paired t-test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cut-off MMEUS to predict MMPRT+.Results: The prevalence of MMPRT+ was 31.3% (25/80 knees) and 29.1% (16/55 knees) in the non-ROA and ROA groups. The MMEUS of MMPRT+ patients were significantly greater than that of MMPRT– patients in both the non-ROA (5.9±1.4 mm vs. 4.4±1.0 mm, P<0.001) and ROA (7.8±1.3 mm vs. 6.3±1.3 mm, P<0.001) groups. ROC curves demonstrated that 5-mm and 7-mm MMEUS were the optimal cut-off values in non-ROA (adjusted odds ratio: 6.280; area under the curve [AUC]: 0.809; P<0.001) and ROA (adjusted odds ratio: 15.003; AUC: 0.797; P=0.001) groups.Conclusions: In early non-radiographic KOA stages, a greater MMEUS was associated with a higher MMPRTMRI prevalence.Level of evidence: III, Cross-sectional cohort study

Investigating the Chronology of Meniscus Root Tears: Do Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears Cause Extrusion or the Other Way Around?

Objectives: Meniscus root tears are increasingly being recognized. Meniscus extrusion has previously been associated with medial root tears; however, the relationship between secondary meniscus restraints, such as the meniscotibial (MT) ligament, extrusion, and root tears has yet to be formally evaluated. The purpose of this study was to better understand the association between MT ligament competence, medial meniscus extrusion, and medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRT), as well as to determine the progression of meniscus extrusion over time. Methods: Serial MRI’s from our institution were reviewed for patients who showed evidence of medial meniscus extrusion and MMPRT on at least one of 2+ available MRI’s. All patients were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis. All MRI’s were analyzed independently by two board-certified musculoskeletal radiologists. MT ligament disruption, medial meniscus extrusion, and MMPRT presence was recorded for each MRI. The time between MRI’s, presence of insufficiency fractures, and Outerbridge classification for the medial femur and tibia were also evaluated. Results: 27 knees in 26 patients were included in this study, with a total of 63 MRI’s analyzed (21 knees with 2 MRI’s, 3 with 3 MRI’s, and 3 with 4 MRI’s). All patients demonstrated clear medial meniscus extrusion and meniscotibial ligament disruption prior to the subsequent development of MMPRTs (p < 0.001). Mean extrusion at the time of initial MRI was 3.3 ± 1.1 mm, and increased significantly to 5.5 ± 1.8 mm at the time of first imaging with an identified MMPRT (p < 0.001). The average time between initial MRI and the first identification of MMPRT on a later MRI was 1.7 ± 1.6 years. Conclusions: In a sample of 27 symptomatic knees with serial MRI’s both before and after MMPRT diagnosis, all patients demonstrated MT ligament disruption and associated meniscus extrusion prior to the development of subsequent medial meniscus root tears. These findings suggest that MT ligament disruption and medial meniscus extrusion represent early and predisposing events contributing to MMPRT. Therefore, this provides a possible explanation of why meniscus extrusion is not corrected with medial meniscus root repair.