Abstract
Rail transportation plays a vital role in U.S. transportation. According to the National Transportation Statistics report from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, railroads generate 29% of ton-miles of freight, whereas air, truck, water, and pipeline transportation represent the rest of the freight traffic. In the passenger spectrum, the 2016 National Transit Summary and Trends report stated that trips using rail transit modes increased from 2012 to 2016. These facts show the importance of rail transportation in the United States and highlight the critical importance of railroad traffic safety. Based on the FRA 2016 statistics, track-related defects are the second-largest cause of rail accidents. Furthermore, track irregularities resulting from defects in these parameters lead to an increase in dynamic forces that accelerate the rate of track deterioration. Consequently, the need to monitor and detect the presence and types of defects on railway tracks arises. The availability of track geometry cars and autonomous visual inspection vehicles has made acquiring track information easier. However, the need to study and understand these data remains unfulfilled. Machine learning has recently started to gain popularity in the field of railroad research due to increasing computational capacity and the need for such tools to provide information that is more useful. Techniques such as deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN), artificial neural networks, and support vector machines have been used for prediction problems in railroad research.
This paper combines engineering judgments and statistical analysis to develop analytical models to estimate the probability of developing geometry defects as a function of tie conditions. The analysis is based on data provided by Georgetown Rail’s AURORA tie inspection system and from a major US class 1 railroad track geometry cars. The data used in this analysis relates to a geometry defect dataset and a tie condition dataset. The geometry dataset covers 125,554 geometry defects taken from several years of track-geometry inspection data. The data collection period was from 2014 to 2016. Convolutional neural network models were developed to estimate the probability of defects given tie patterns, as well as the outputs of the models used to build multiple regression models. Additionally, various data analysis issues were addressed in this paper. This paper’s contribution includes predictive models of track geometry defects as a function of tie condition and position. The models provide approaches to predicting the probability of geometry defects as functions of tie conditions and positions.