sulfide segregation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1050
Author(s):  
Banxiao Ruan ◽  
Mingyang Liao ◽  
Bingke Sun ◽  
Chao Chen

The mineral chemistry of chromite and silicate minerals in the Baixintan magmatic Ni-Cu sulfide deposit in the Northern Tianshan, southern Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) are reported here. Two types of chromite were identified in mafic-ultramafic rocks. Type I chromite occurs as inclusions encased in olivine and has a primary and magmatic origin and homogeneous composition with Cr# values (49–66). It is characterized by high Ti contents (0.33–1.52 wt%) and small quantities of ZnO (0–0.21 wt%), MnO (0.28–0.45 wt%), and NiO (0.06–0.24 wt%) contents. In contrast, type II chromite with interstitial phase and larger compositional variations has significantly higher TiO2 (up to 6.2 wt%) and FeOt contents (up to 69.3 wt%) and slightly lower Al2O3 (minimum 3.0 wt%) and MgO contents (minimum 0.53 wt%). It is considered to crystallize from a more evolved and fractionated melt and suffers from post-magmatic alteration, such as serpentinization and chloritization. The olivine has forsterite values (Fo) varying from 76.8 to 85.6. The parental magma is characterized by high temperature (1389 °C), high pressure (3.8 Gpa), and high Mg content (11.4 wt%) with oxidized (FMQ + 1.6) and hydrous nature based on compositions of primary chromite and olivine–chromite pairs. The intrusion originated from high-degree partial melting of depleted mantle that had been modified by crustal components and metasomatized by subduction fluid in a post-orogenic extensional setting. Two stages of sulfide segregation have been recognized. Early segregation led to the depletion of platinum group elements (PGE), and disseminated sulfide mineralization was the product of later segregation. The assimilation of crustal Si and S components played more important roles on sulfide segregation rather than fractional crystallization.


2020 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 103767
Author(s):  
A.P. Jesus ◽  
António Mateus ◽  
Mathieu Benoit ◽  
C.C.G. Tassinari ◽  
Telmo Bento dos Santos

Minerals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangang Jiao ◽  
Feng Han ◽  
Liandang Zhao ◽  
Jun Duan ◽  
Mengxi Wang

The Jinchuan Ni-Cu-PGE deposit is the single largest magmatic Ni-sulfide deposit in the world, with three different hypotheses on its ore-forming processes (e.g., in-situ sulfide segregation of sulfide-bearing magma, deep segregation with multiple injections of magma, and hydrothermal superimposition) mainly based on study of whole-rock geochemistry and isotopes (e.g., S-Sr-Nd-Hf). In this study, we mainly concentrated on magnetite textural and geochemical characteristics from different sulfide ores to clarify the genetic types and geochemical difference of the Jinchuan magnetite, and to explore a new credible ore-forming process by magnetite formation process when combined with detailed deposit geology. Three types of magnetite from massive and disseminated sulfide ores were observed by different textural analysis, and they were shown to have different genetic types (mainly in geochemistry) and trace elemental features. Type I magnetite is subhedral to anhedral from massive Ni- (or Fe-) and Cu-rich sulfide ores, with apparent magmatic origin, whereas Type II (dendritic or laminar crystals) and III magnetite (granular crystals as disseminated structures) from disseminated Cu-rich sulfide ores may have precipitated from late stage of melts evolved from a primitive Fe-rich and sulfide-bearing system with magmatic origin, but their geochemistry being typical of hydrothermal magnetite, videlicet, depletions of Ti (< 20 ppm), Al (< 51 ppm), Zr (0.01–0.57 ppm), Hf (0.03–0.06 ppm), Nb (0.01–0.14 ppm), and Ta (0.01–0.21 ppm). Such different types of magnetite can be clearly distinguished from concentrations and ratios of their trace elements, such as Ti, V, Co, Ni, Zn, Zr, Sn, Ga, and Ni/Cr. Those different types of Jinchuan magnetite crystallized from (evolved) sulfide-bearing systems and their geochemistries in trace elements are controlled mainly by evolution of ore-related systems and geochemical parameters (e.g., T and fO2), with the former playing a predominant role. Combining the previous literature with this study, we propose that the Jinchuan deposit formed by multiple pluses of sulfide-bearing magma during fractional crystallization, with the emplacing of more fractionated and sulfide-bearing magma during sulfide segregation playing a predominant role. During this multiple emplacement and evolving of sulfide-bearing systems, Type I magmatic magnetite crystallized from primitive and evolved Fe-rich MSS (monosulfide solid solution), while Type II and III magnetite crystallized from evolved Fe-rich MSS to Cu-rich ISS (intermediate solid solution) during sulfide fractionation, with those Type II and III magnetite having much higher Cu contents compared with that of Type I magnetite.


Science ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 353 (6304) ◽  
pp. 1141-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Rubie ◽  
V. Laurenz ◽  
S. A. Jacobson ◽  
A. Morbidelli ◽  
H. Palme ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 457-458 ◽  
pp. 270-273
Author(s):  
Yi You Tu ◽  
Guo Zhong Li

Effect of superheat and initial rolling temperature on the morphology and distribution of sulfide in non quenched and tempered free cutting steel 30MnVS has been studied by optical microscope and scanning electron microscope. Results show that proper superheat and initial rolling temperature can turn rod-shaped sulfide into massive or globular sulfide,to alleviate sulfide segregation and pro-eutectoid ferrite distribution along the boundary of pearlite clusters in 30MnVS , increase the intragranular ferrite content and optimize the structure of continuous casting slab.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document