Double kissing – crush technique to treat coronary bifurcation lesions: analysis of success rate, procedural times and device usage

Background The Double Kissing Crush (“DK Crush”) technique is one of the recommended planned 2-stent techniques to treat true coronary bifurcation lesions (Medina 1–1-1, Medina 0–1-1). While some trials demonstrated superiority to other techniques, DK Crush requires a sequence of specific and potentially technically challenging steps. No data exists on the procedural difficulty of the various steps required for DK Crush. We therefore analyzed procedural times and device usage in a systematic fashion. Methods and results 54 patients (42 male, mean age 67±12 years) intended for treatment with DK Crush were enrolled. Detailed procedural characteristics including exact times and device usage for each step of DK Crush were prospectively measured and analyzed. DK Crush was successful in 48/54 patients (89%). In two patients stenting technique was changed to T- or TAP-stenting due to anatomical reasons at the moment of positioning of the SB stent. In one patient no balloon could cross the lesion and in another the procedure had to be modified due to coronary perforation directly after pre-dilatation. True failure of DK Crush was observed in two cases: In one case, the first rewiring of the SB, in the other, placement of a balloon for first kissing balloon (KB) maneuver in the SB was not possible. These 6 patients were excluded from further analysis. Median times for each step were: 1:21min (IQR 0:52min-1:50min) for wiring SB, 1:18min (IQR 0:47min-1:42min) for wiring MV, 1:30min (IQR 0:54min-2:15min) for stent placement in the SB, 0:40min (IQR 0:29min-1:21min) for balloon placement in the MV. First rewiring of the SB after SB stent crush required 1:30min (IQR 0:37min-2:05min), 1st KB placement in the SB took 1:42min (IQR 1:00min-3:13min) and 1st KB placement in the MV required 0:45min (IQR 0:27min-1:19min). Stent placement in the MV required 1:34min (IQR 1:09min-2:40min) and 2nd rewiring of the SB 1:21min (IQR 0:55min-2:04min), 2nd KB placement of the SB 2:08min (IQR 1:01min-3:36min) and 2nd KB placement of the MV 0:50min (IQR 0:34min-1:01min). Final POT was performed in all cases. Median total procedure time was 52:35 min (IQR 00:42:54h-1:01:37h). Additional devices were needed in 10% (3x1, 2x2 balloons) for stent placement in the SB; in 46% (20x1, 1x4 wires) for the first rewiring of the SB and in 49% (20x1, 3x2 balloons) for 1st KB placement in the SB. The 2nd rewiring of the SB required additional wires in 32% (13x1, 2x2 wires) and 54% of the patients required additional balloons for the 2nd KB placement in the SB (20x1, 2x2, 1x3, 2x5 balloons). Final TIMI flow was III in 97.9%. Complications occurred in 6% (n=3), each showing coronary dissection with TIMI III flow in 2 patients and TIMI I flow in 1 patient after placement of additional stents. Conclusion DKMC has a high success rate but is a time-consuming and material-intensive technique. The placement of the 2nd KB in the SB requires most of the procedural time and resources. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Left anterior descending/right coronary artery bifurcation angioplasty in a rare case of single coronary artery: a case report

Background Single coronary artery (SCA) is a rare congenital coronary anomaly with incidence of 8–66 per 100 000 cases. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with SCA is technically challenging. This is a case of bifurcation angioplasty involving left anterior descending/right coronary artery (LAD/RCA) in a patient with SCA and 1-year follow-up with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA). Case summary A 52-year-old female with history of PCI to LAD 4 months back, presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Coronary angiogram showed 90% stenosis in mid-LAD, distal to the previous stent and proximal to an anomalously originating RCA from mid-LAD. She was planned for LAD/RCA provisional bifurcation angioplasty and a drug-eluting stent was deployed in LAD across RCA, following which patient developed angina with ischaemic electrocardiogram (ECG) changes due to significant pinching of RCA. Using Reverse crush technique, RCA was stented successfully with resolution of angina and ECG changes. At 1-year follow-up, patient is in New York Heart Association class I with normal left ventricular function and patent LAD/RCA bifurcation stent on CTCA. Discussion SCA poses a great challenge to interventional cardiologists during PCI, especially in the event of a complication. Detailed anatomical knowledge, appropriate hardware and operator expertise are the key factors for successful PCI of SCA. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first case report of bifurcation angioplasty of LAD/RCA in a rare case of SCA. This case also describes the use of reverse crush technique as a bailout strategy during provisional bifurcation angioplasty.

Comparison of Different Stenting Techniques of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Network Meta-Analysis of 7601 Patients

IntroductionIntervention on coronary bifurcations lesions (CBL) is challenging. While provisional side branch (PS) stenting is the recommended method in most cases, there is no consensus on the preferred 2-stent technique.Material and methodsWe performed a network meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies comparing stenting techniques in CBL with reported clinical outcomes. A mixed treatment comparison model generation was performed to compare culotte, T and protrusion (TAP), crush and provisional techniques.ResultsWe included 14 RCT and 14 observational studies comprising 7,601 patients among whom 2,516 were treated with PS, 792 with TAP, 1,493 with culotte and 2,808 with crush. A Bayesian network meta-analysis showed a significant rate reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR=0.73; 95%CI 0.52-0.99) and a trend for reduction in lesion revascularization (OR=0.72; 95%CI 0.48-1.11) and myocardial infarction (OR=0.62; 95%CI 0.3-1.08) with the crush technique, mainly driven by the double kissing (DK) crush, compared with all other stenting techniques. Other clinical outcomes, including mortality and stent thrombosis (ST) did not differ significantly between methods.ConclusionsThe crush technique, and especially DKcrush, is associated with improved outcomes compared to culotte, T and protrusion (TAP) and provisional techniques for CBL treatment. Further research is required to determine the optimal stenting technique for CBL.