congenital abdominal wall defects
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

49
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Arimatias Raitio ◽  
Nelly Kalliokoski ◽  
Johanna Syvänen ◽  
Samuli Harju ◽  
Asta Tauriainen ◽  
...  

AbstractThe aim of this nationwide population-based case–control study was to assess the incidence of inguinal hernia (IH) among patients with congenital abdominal wall defects. All infants born with congenital abdominal wall defects between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2014, were identified in the Finnish Register of Congenital Malformations. Six controls matched for gestational age, sex, and year of birth were selected for each case in the Medical Birth Register. The Finnish Hospital Discharge Register was searched for relevant diagnosis codes for IH, and hernia incidence was compared between cases and controls. We identified 178 infants with gastroschisis and 150 with omphalocele and selected randomly 1968 matched, healthy controls for comparison. Incidence of IH was significantly higher in gastroschisis girls than in matched controls, relative risk (RR) 7.20 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.25–23.07). In boys with gastroschisis, no statistically significant difference was observed, RR 1.60 (95% CI 0.75–3.38). Omphalocele was associated with higher risk of IH compared to matched controls, RR 6.46 (95% CI 3.90–10.71), and the risk was equally elevated in male and female patients.Conclusion: Risk of IH is significantly higher among patients with congenital abdominal wall defects than in healthy controls supporting hypothesis that elevated intra-abdominal pressure could prevent natural closure of processus vaginalis. Parents should be informed of this elevated hernia risk to avoid delays in seeking care. We also recommend careful follow-up during the first months of life as most of these hernias are diagnosed early in life. What is Known:• Inguinal hernia is one of the most common disorders encountered by a pediatric surgeon.• Prematurity increases the risk of inguinal hernia. What is New:• Children with congenital abdominal wall defects have a significantly higher risk of inguinal hernia than general population.• Families should be informed of this elevated hernia risk to avoid delays in seeking care.


Author(s):  
Stefan Bittmann

Omphalocele is one of the congenital abdominal wall defects and specifically refers to an umbilical ring defect in which the abdominal organs protrude in front of the abdominal wall in a thin sac or membrane. Such an abdominal wall defect develops around the third week of pregnancy due to the failure of adhesion between the embryonic lateral abdominal wall components.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Chukwubuike Emeka

Objective: To evaluate our experience on the pattern and treatment outcome of neonates who presented with congenital abdominal wall defects (CAWD) in a teaching hospital in Enugu, Nigeria. Methodology: This was a retrospective study of neonates who presented with abdominal wall defect of congenital origin between January 2014 and December 2018 at the pediatric surgery unit of Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH) Enugu, Nigeria. Results: A total of 236,231 neonates were seen during the study period. Out of this number, 48 neonates had CAWD. This gave a prevalence of 0.02% or 2 babies per 10,000 births. There was male predominance and majority of the neonates were delivered preterm through the vaginal route. Omphalocele and gastroschisis were the most common CAWD and about 50% of the CAWD were diagnosed prenatally through maternal ultrasound. There was a low incidence of associated anomalies and only one-tenth of the mothers gave a history of a possible risk factor. Treatment of CAWD depended on the specific anomaly and sepsis was the most common post-operative complication. Mortality occurred in 8 (16.7%) neonates. Conclusion: Omphalocele and gastroschisis were the most common types of CAWD recorded in the present study. Most of the neonates were delivered vaginally as preterm babies. Treatment was based on the type of CAWD and majority of the neonates survived.


Author(s):  
Arimatias Raitio ◽  
Johanna Syvänen ◽  
Asta Tauriainen ◽  
Anna Hyvärinen ◽  
Ulla Sankilampi ◽  
...  

AbstractCongenital abdominal wall defects, namely, gastroschisis and omphalocele, are rare congenital malformations with significant morbidity. The long-term burden of these anomalies to families and health care providers has not previously been assessed. We aimed to determine the need for hospital admissions and the requirement for surgery after initial admission at birth. For our analyses, we identified all infants with either gastroschisis (n=178) or omphalocele (n=150) born between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2014, in the Register of Congenital Malformations. The data on all hospital admissions and operations performed were acquired from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register between Jan 1, 1998, and Dec 31, 2015, and compared to data on the whole Finnish pediatric population (0.9 million) live born 1993−2008. Patients with gastroschisis and particularly those with omphalocele required hospital admissions 1.8 to 5.7 times more than the general pediatric population (p<0.0001). Surgical interventions were more common among omphalocele than gastroschisis patients (p=0.013). At the mean follow-up of 8.9 (range 1.0–18.0) years, 29% (51/178) of gastroschisis and 30% (45/150) of omphalocele patients required further abdominal surgery after discharge from the neonatal admission.Conclusion: Patients with gastroschisis and especially those with omphalocele, are significantly more likely than the general pediatric population to require hospital care. Nevertheless, almost half of the patients can be treated without further surgery, and redo abdominal surgery is only required in a third of these children. What is Known:• Gastroschisis and omphalocele are congenital malformations with significant morbidity• There are no reports on the long-term need for hospital admissions and surgery in these childrenWhat is New:• Patients with abdominal wall defects are significantly more likely than the general pediatric population to require hospital care• Almost half of the patients can be treated without further surgery, and abdominal redo operations are only required in a third of these children


Author(s):  
Arimatias Raitio ◽  
Johanna Syvänen ◽  
Asta Tauriainen ◽  
Anna Hyvärinen ◽  
Ulla Sankilampi ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Several studies have reported high prevalence of undescended testis (UDT) among boys with congenital abdominal wall defects (AWD). Due to rarity of AWDs, however, true prevalence of testicular maldescent among these boys is not known. We conducted a national register study to determine the prevalence of UDT among Finnish males with an AWD. Methods All male infants with either gastroschisis or omphalocele born between Jan 1, 1998 and Dec 31, 2015 were identified in the Register of Congenital Malformations. The data on all performed operations were acquired from the Care Register for Health Care. The register data were examined for relevant UDT diagnosis and operation codes. Results We identified 99 males with gastroschisis and 89 with omphalocele. UDT was diagnosed in 10 (10.1%) infants with gastroschisis and 22 (24.7%) with omphalocele. Majority of these required an operation; 8/99 (8.1%) gastroschisis and 19/89 (21.3%) omphalocele patients. UDT is more common among AWD patients than general population with the highest prevalence in omphalocele. Conclusions Cryptorchidism is more common among boys with an AWD than general population. Furthermore, omphalocele carries significantly higher risk of UDT and need for orchidopexy than gastroschisis. Due to high prevalence testicular maldescent, careful follow-up for UDT is recommended.


2018 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice C. Burnett ◽  
Julia K. Gunn ◽  
Esther A. Hutchinson ◽  
Margaret M. Moran ◽  
Lisa M. Kelly ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (06) ◽  
pp. 516-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine Dietrich ◽  
Jan Zeidler ◽  
Jochen Blaser ◽  
Jan Gosemann ◽  
Martin Lacher ◽  
...  

Introduction We aimed to analyze for the first time the characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes in infants with congenital abdominal wall defects (CAWDs) in Germany and to compare the results with current literature reports. Patients and Methods Data of a health insurance covering approximately 10% of the German population were analyzed. Patients who had undergone CAWD closure during a period of nearly 6 years were included. Surgical approach was categorized into primary versus secondary closure. Complications were defined as any reintervention within 1 year after initial treatment. Results Patients with gastroschisis were treated in 24 centers, newborns with omphalocele in 34 centers. There was no mortality, and the type of surgical approach had no significant impact on the incidence of complications in both gastroschisis and omphalocele. Out of 39 patients with gastroschisis, 72% had undergone primary closure being associated with a shorter duration of ventilation (p = 0.003) and hospitalization (p < 0.001). Out of 54 patients with omphalocele, 54% had undergone secondary closure, whereas modality of management did not affect duration of ventilation and hospitalization. Although heterogeneous, data of the current literature were comparable to those of this study. Conclusion Unbiased data demonstrate for the first time that the quality of the current surgical management of newborns with CAWD across Germany is excellent. There was no correlation of complications with the method of closure in gastroschisis and omphalocele.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document