A Case of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura without Pathognomonic Schistocytes

Patients diagnosed with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) typically present with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and thrombocytopenia; these two clinical manifestations were often believed to be essential indicators of TTP. However, such indicators are not always present in every case. Here, we present a patient affected by TTP but showing no distinctive schistocytes on blood smear review. TTP was diagnosed through a critically low level of a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13 (ADAMTS13) activity. Awareness of such an atypical presentation of TTP is essential for timely treatment to prevent serious and even fatal outcomes for patients.

And the Oscar goes to peripheral blood film for detection of lead poisoning in a complicated patient: A case report with review of laboratory clues

Background Peripheral blood smear examination is an invaluable laboratory test which provides the complete hematologic and/or non-hematologic picture of a case. In addition to verifying the results of automated cell counters, it has the potential to identify some pathologic morphologic changes that remain hidden using the cell counters alone. Case presentation A 40-year-old man with a 3 year history of alcohol intake and marijuana abuse presented with severe lower extremities bone pain and abdominal pain. Physical examination showed high blood pressure, high pulse rate and abdominal tenderness. He underwent extensive laboratory and imaging tests, and cholecystectomy and bone marrow study, without any definite diagnosis or improvement. Right after all these invasive, expensive and time consuming investigations during a month, finding a point on the peripheral blood smear by an expert led to the final diagnosis. The finding was coarse basophilic stippling in the red blood cells. Elevated blood lead level and the presence of ring sideroblast in the bone marrow study confirmed the diagnosis of lead poisoning and the patient responded well to chelator therapy in a short period. Conclusion This case clearly shows the value of peripheral blood smear review and its impact on the patient care. In order not to lose the cases, laboratories are recommended to design their own policy for peripheral blood smear review. Peripheral blood smear is the fastest, simplest, and most available screening test which could prevent many misdiagnoses and malpractices. It provides rich morphological information, among which basophilic stippling is highly suggestive of lead poisoning.

Assessment of International Consensus Group for Haematology smear review rules among patients with Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Johannesburg, South Africa

A peripheral blood smear review is a useful but labour intensive adjunct to the full blood count and differential count. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the performance of the International Consensus Group for Haematology smear review rules for detection of malaria in 153 samples with Plasmodium falciparumparasitaemia. Review rules were triggered in 132 (86.3%) samples, including all patients with severe malaria. Of the 21 false negative samples, 14 (66.7%) had haemoglobin values ≥ 10g/dl and platelets > 120x109/l.