observational procedure
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

27
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Szczepanik ◽  
Anna M. Kaźmierowska ◽  
Jarosław M. Michałowski ◽  
Marek Wypych ◽  
Andreas Olsson ◽  
...  

Abstract Learning to avoid threats often occurs by observing others. Most previous research on observational fear learning (OFL) in humans has used pre-recorded standardized video of an actor and thus lacked ecological validity. Here, we aimed to enhance ecological validity of the OFL by engaging participants in a real-time observational procedure (35 pairs of healthy male friends, age 18–27). One of the participants watched the other undergo a differential fear conditioning task, in which a conditioned stimulus (CS+) was paired with an aversive electric shock and another stimulus (CS−) was always safe. Subsequently, the CS+ and CS− were presented to the observer to test the OFL. While the friend’s reactions to the shock elicited strong skin conductance responses (SCR) in all observers, subsequent differential SCRs (CS+ > CS−) were found only when declarative knowledge of the CS+/US contingency (rated by the participants) was acquired. Contingency-aware observers also showed elevated fear potentiated startle responses during both CS+ and CS− compared to baseline. We conclude that our real-time procedure can be effectively used to study OFL. The procedure allowed for dissecting two components of the OFL: an automatic emotional reaction to the response of the demonstrator and learning about stimulus contingency.


2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 655-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Venturelli ◽  
Elena Cabrini ◽  
Laura Fruggeri ◽  
Ada Cigala

2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki HIRANO ◽  
Yoshihiko USUDA ◽  
Koji KANZAWA ◽  
Kazu MIYATA ◽  
Norikazu SHIMIZU

2002 ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuhiko OTANI ◽  
Ryosaku SASAKI ◽  
Masahiko MAEDA ◽  
Masato SHINJI ◽  
Shunsuke SAKURAI

2000 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 571-584
Author(s):  
Nicole Capitaine

AbstractThe current IAU conventional models for precession and nutation are referred to the Celestial Ephemeris Pole (CEP). However, the concept corresponding to the CEP is not clear and cannot easily be extended to the most recent models and observations. Its realization is actually dependent both on the model used for precession, nutation and polar motion and on the observational procedure for estimating the Earth orientation parameters. A new definition of the CEP should therefore be given in order to be in agreement with modern models and observations at a microarsecond level. This paper reviews the various realizations of the pole according to the models and observations and discusses the proposals for a modern definition of the CEP that are under consideration within the work of the subgroup T5 entitled “Computational Consequences” of the “ICRS” IAU Working Group.


1994 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 611-614
Author(s):  
O. Alonso ◽  
J. Zamorano ◽  
M. Rego ◽  
J. Gallego ◽  
A.G. Vitores

The most unambiguous way to discover new emission-line galaxies (ELGs) is directly by the presence of their lines, using objective-prism plates of adequate resolution. The first survey using this technique was developed by Smith in 1975 with the 0.6 m CTIO Curtis Schmidt Telescope. The Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) is carrying out a survey of ELGs with the Schmidt Telescope at Calar Alto (Almería, Spain) using the presence of Ha in emission in IIIa-F prism plates as selection criterion. The observational procedure and results are described in Rego et al. 1989; Zamorano et al. 1990; Zamorano et al. 1993.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document