Nocturnal hypoxaemia in interstitial lung disease: a systematic review

BackgroundPatients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) are at risk of developing nocturnal hypoxaemia due to ventilatory restriction and impaired gas exchange that worsen with supine posture and reduced ventilatory drive during sleep. This systematic review synthesised literature on the diagnostic evaluation, epidemiology, associations, management and prognosis of nocturnal hypoxaemia in ILD.MethodsOvid MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases were searched for eligible studies. Meta-analyses with subgroup analyses were conducted, where possible.ResultsFifty-three studies were included (total participant number=2590). The most common definition for clinically significant nocturnal hypoxaemia was ≥10% of total sleep time with oxyhaemoglobin saturation <90%, with pooled prevalence of 37%. There were no significant differences in pooled prevalence according to ILD subtype and comorbid obstructive sleep apnoea status. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis of associations and prognosis. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and echocardiographic features for pulmonary hypertension were consistently associated with nocturnal hypoxaemia. There were inconsistent associations between nocturnal hypoxaemia with ILD subtype and severity. Multivariable analyses in most studies demonstrated significant associations of nocturnal hypoxaemia with survival. Two small short-term intervention studies demonstrated that supplemental oxygen of 1–3 L/min corrected nocturnal hypoxaemia, with improved heart rate control during in-laboratory observation and increased serum antioxidant levels after 1 month of therapy.ConclusionNocturnal hypoxaemia is common, associated with DLCO impairment and markers suggestive of pulmonary hypertension, and a potential prognostic factor in patients in ILD. There is a need to establish a consensus definition of nocturnal hypoxaemia and evaluate long-term effects of nocturnal supplemental oxygen in ILD.

A novel parameter is better than the AHI to assess nocturnal hypoxaemia and excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea

To evaluate whether the percentage of total sleep time spent with apnoea and hypopnoea duration time (AHT%) is better than the apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) for the assessment of nocturnal hypoxaemia and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Patients with suspected OSA were enrolled. Polysomnography, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, self-administered surveys and anthropometric measures were performed. The efficiency of AHT% and the AHI was evaluated for nocturnal hypoxaemia and EDS. A total of 160 eligible participants were analysed. The median AHT% in normal, mild, moderate and severe OSA patients was significantly different in the four-group patients with OSA. Spearman rank correlations analysis found that the associations were stronger between AHT% with percentage of total sleep time and O2 saturation of < 90% and minimum nocturnal oxygen saturation than these parameters with the AHI. AHT% had a greater area under the curve than the AHI for predicting EDS in patients with OSA. AHT% was significantly higher in the EDS group. We present a novel parameter, AHT%, to evaluate nocturnal hypoxaemia and EDS in OSA patients. AHT% partially compensates for the shortcomings of the AHI. AHT% is better than the AHI for assessing nocturnal hypoxaemia and EDS. AHT% reflects different clinical characteristics associated with OSA from a new perspective.

Oxygen therapy in COPD and interstitial lung disease: navigating the knowns and unknowns

Domiciliary oxygen therapy is often prescribed for patients with hypoxaemia due to advanced lung disease, most commonly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) trials conducted in patients with COPD in the 1980s remain the basis for clinical decisions and guideline recommendations regarding LTOT for patients with non-COPD conditions as there is a lack of high-quality evidence concerning its use in the non-COPD population. There is also a lack of evidence for the use of ambulatory and nocturnal oxygen therapy in patients with isolated exertional and nocturnal hypoxaemia. These deficiencies pose significant challenges in patient care, with consequent discrepancies in guideline recommendations and clinical approaches. In recent years, new studies have been and are currently being conducted to fill the gaps in our understanding and use of domiciliary oxygen therapy for other indications, including ILD. This article provides a comparison of the epidemiology and significance of hypoxaemia in patients with COPD and ILD, with an up-to-date review of current evidence regarding the role of different types of domiciliary oxygen therapy in these conditions.