versus mechanism
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 289-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie G. Burel ◽  
Bjoern Peters
Keyword(s):  

Gesnerus ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-289
Author(s):  
Roberto Lo Presti

Few discoveries in the history of medicine had a greater impact than William Harvey’s discovery of the circulation of blood, and few intellectual milieus of the early modern period had as decisive a part in the rise of ‘modern’ medicine and the shaping of the western scientific mentality in general than the philosophical and scientific movement of ‘Venetian Aristotelianism’, which grew up around the University of Padua, where Harvey himself had studied. In this chapter, I aim to explore some aspects of the intellectual movement of ‘Venetian Aristotelianism’ as well as the debate that ensued upon the discovery of the circulation of blood. My focus, however, is not on any of the major protagonists, but rather on a quite marginal figure in this debate, namely Hieronymus Franzosi.


2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (6) ◽  
pp. 1471-1477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Krieger ◽  
Hale E. Wills ◽  
Mary Christine Green ◽  
Ana L. Gleisner ◽  
Dennis W. Vane

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Budish

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 272-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie A. Thompson

AbstractUsing normative correctness as a diagnostic tool reduces the outcome of complex cognitive functions to a binary classification (normative or non-normative). It also focuses attention on outcomes, rather than processes, impeding the development of good cognitive theories. Given that both normative and non-normative responses may be produced by the same process, normativity is a poor indicator of underlying processes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 64 (7) ◽  
pp. 622-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren W. Tryon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document