coenzym a
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

78
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1120-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatjana Goebel ◽  
Simone Mausbach ◽  
Andreas Tuermer ◽  
Heba Eltahir ◽  
Dominic Winter ◽  
...  

The degradation of intra- and extracellular proteins is essential in all cell types and mediated by two systems, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and the autophagy-lysosome pathway. This study investigates the changes in autophagosomal and lysosomal proteomes upon inhibition of proteasomes by bortezomib (BTZ) or MG132. We find an increased abundance of more than 50 proteins in lysosomes of cells in which the proteasome is inhibited. Among those are dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), β-Catenin and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzym-A (HMGCoA)-reductase. Because these proteins are known to be degraded by the proteasome they seem to be compensatorily delivered to the autophagosomal pathway when the proteasome is inactivated. Surprisingly, most of the proteins which show increased amounts in the lysosomes of BTZ or MG132 treated cells are proteasomal subunits. Thus an inactivated, non-functional proteasome is delivered to the autophagic pathway. Native gel electrophoresis shows that the proteasome reaches the lysosome intact and not disassembled. Adaptor proteins, which target proteasomes to autophagy, have been described in Arabidopsis, Saccharomyces and upon starvation in mammalians. However, in cell lines deficient of these proteins or their mammalian orthologues, respectively, the transfer of proteasomes to the lysosome is not impaired. Obviously, these proteins do not play a role as autophagy adaptor proteins in mammalian cells. We can also show that chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) does not participate in the proteasome delivery to the lysosomes. In autophagy-related (ATG)-5 and ATG7 deficient cells the delivery of inactivated proteasomes to the autophagic pathway was only partially blocked, indicating the existence of at least two different pathways by which inactivated proteasomes can be delivered to the lysosome in mammalian cells.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth M. Haberl ◽  
Rebekka Pohl ◽  
Lisa Rein-Fischboeck ◽  
Susanne Feder ◽  
Christopher J. Sinal ◽  
...  

The tumor inhibitory potential of the highly active chemerin-156 isoform was described in orthotopic models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The majority of HCC arises in the fibrotic liver, which was not reproduced in these studies. Here, a potential therapeutic activity of chemerin-156 was evaluated in diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced liver cancer, which mimics fibrosis-associated HCC. Mice were infected with adeno-associated virus (AAV) six months after DEN injection to overexpress chemerin-156 in the liver, and animals injected with non-recombinant-AAV served as controls. Three months later, the animals were killed. Both groups were comparable with regard to liver steatosis and fibrosis. Of note, the number of very small tumors was reduced by chemerin-156. Anyhow, the expression of inflammatory and profibrotic genes was similar in larger tumors of control and chemerin-156-AAV-infected animals. Although genes with a role in lipid metabolism, like 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzym-A--reductase, were overexpressed in tumors of animals with high chemerin-156, total hepatic cholesterol, diacylglycerol and triglyceride levels, and distribution of individual lipid species were normal. Chemerin-156-AAV-infected mice had elevated hepatic and systemic chemerin. Ex vivo activation of the chemerin receptor chemokine-like receptor 1 increased in parallel with serum chemerin, illustrating the biological activity of the recombinant protein. In the tumors, chemerin-155 was the most abundant variant. Chemerin-156 was not detected in tumors of the controls and was hardly found in chemerin-156-AAV infected animals. In conclusion, the present study showed that chemerin-156 overexpression caused a decline in the number of small lesions but did not prevent the growth of pre-existing neoplasms.


2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (08) ◽  
pp. 545-553
Author(s):  
Michael Igel ◽  
Thomas Sudhop ◽  
Klaus Bergmann
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 123 (52) ◽  
pp. 12829-12833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina Horn ◽  
Christian Limberg ◽  
Christian Herwig ◽  
Stefan Mebs
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 120 (17) ◽  
pp. 3298-3301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Friedrich ◽  
Daniel J. Darley ◽  
Bernard T. Golding ◽  
Wolfgang Buckel
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document