uv induction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

46
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Ivana Jevtić ◽  
Sandra Jakšić ◽  
Dragana Četojević Simin ◽  
Maria Uzelac ◽  
Biljana Abramović

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1962
Author(s):  
Wannit Tongkao-on ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Bianca Y. McCarthy ◽  
Warusavithana G. Manori De Silva ◽  
Mark S. Rybchyn ◽  
...  

Susceptibility to photoimmune suppression and photocarcinogenesis is greater in male than in female humans and mice and is exacerbated in female estrogen receptor-beta knockout (ER-β−/−) mice. We previously reported that the active vitamin D hormone, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D), applied topically protects against the ultraviolet radiation (UV) induction of cutaneous cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and the suppression of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) in female mice. Here, we compare these responses in female versus male Skh:hr1 mice, in ER-β−/−/−− versus wild-type C57BL/6 mice, and in female ER-blockaded Skh:hr1 mice. The induction of CPDs was significantly greater in male than female Skh:hr1 mice and was more effectively reduced by 1,25(OH)2D in female Skh:hr1 and C57BL/6 mice than in male Skh:hr1 or ER-β−/− mice, respectively. This correlated with the reduced sunburn inflammation due to 1,25(OH)2D in female but not male Skh:hr1 mice. Furthermore, although 1,25(OH)2D alone dose-dependently suppressed basal CHS responses in male Skh:hr1 and ER-β−/− mice, UV-induced immunosuppression was universally observed. In female Skh:hr1 and C57BL/6 mice, the immunosuppression was decreased by 1,25(OH)2D dose-dependently, but not in male Skh:hr1, ER-β−/−, or ER-blockaded mice. These results reveal a sex bias in genetic, inflammatory, and immune photoprotection by 1,25(OH)2D favoring female mice that is dependent on the presence of ER-β.


Author(s):  
Wannit Tongkao-on ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Bianca Y McCarthy ◽  
Warusavithana GM De Silva ◽  
Mark S Rybchyn ◽  
...  

Susceptibility to photoimmune suppression and photocarcinogenesis is greater in male than in female humans and mice and is exacerbated in female estrogen receptor-beta knockout (ER-β-/-) mice. We previously reported that the active vitamin D hormone, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D) applied topically protects against ultraviolet radiation (UV)-induction of cutaneous cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and suppression of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) in female mice. Here we compare these responses in female versus male Skh:hr1 mice, in ER-β-/- versus wild type C57BL/6 mice, and in female ER-blockaded Skh:hr1 mice. Induction of CPDs was significantly greater in male than female Skh:hr1 mice and was more effectively reduced by 1,25(OH)2D in female Skh:hr1 and C57BL/6 mice, than in male Skh:hr1 or ER-β-/- mice respectively. This correlated with reduced sunburn inflammation by 1,25(OH)2D in female but not male Skh:hr1 mice. Furthermore, although 1,25(OH)2D alone dose-dependently suppressed basal CHS responses in male Skh:hr1 and ER-β-/- mice, UV-induced immunosuppression was universally observed. In female Skh:hr1 and C57BL/6 mice, the immunosuppression was decreased by 1,25(OH)2D dose-dependently, but not in male Skh:hr1, ER-β-/- or ER-blockaded mice. These results reveal a sex bias in genetic, inflammatory and immune photoprotection by 1,25(OH)2D favoring female mice, that is dependent on the presence of ER-β.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 0130002
Author(s):  
韩仲志 Han Zhongzhi ◽  
万剑华 Wan Jianhua ◽  
刘永萍 Liu Yongping ◽  
刘康炜 Liu Kangwei ◽  
刘杰 Liu Jie

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 6453-6461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Fusco ◽  
Qunxin She ◽  
Gabriella Fiorentino ◽  
Simonetta Bartolucci ◽  
Patrizia Contursi

ABSTRACTSulfolobusspindle-shaped virus 1 represents a model for studying virus-host interaction in harsh environments, and it is so far the only member of the familyFuselloviridaethat shows a UV-inducible life cycle. Although the virus has been extensively studied, mechanisms underpinning the maintenance of lysogeny as well as those regulating the UV induction have received little attention. Recently, a novel SSV1 transcription factor, F55, was identified. This factor was able to bindin vitroto several sequences derived from the early and UV-inducible promoters of the SSV1 genome. The location of these binding sites together with the differential affinity of F55 for these sequences led to the hypothesis that this protein might be involved in the maintenance of the SSV1 lysogeny. Here, we report anin vivosurvey of the molecular events occurring at the UV-inducible region of the SSV1 genome, with a focus on the binding profile of F55 before and after the UV irradiation. The binding of F55 to the target promoters correlates with transcription repression, whereas its dissociation is paralleled by transcription activation. Therefore, we propose that F55 acts as a molecular switch for the transcriptional regulation of the early viral genes.IMPORTANCEFunctional genomic studies of SSV1 proteins have been hindered by the lack of similarity with other characterized proteins. As a result, few insights into theirin vivoroles have been gained throughout the last 3 decades. Here, we report the firstin vivoinvestigation of an SSV1 transcription regulator, F55, that plays a key role in the transition from the lysogenic to the induced state of SSV1. We show that F55 regulates the expression of the UV-inducible as well as the early genes. Moreover, the differential affinity of this transcription factor for these targets allows a fine-tuned and temporal coordinated regulation of transcription of viral genes.


Extremophiles ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 539-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Fusco ◽  
Martina Aulitto ◽  
Simonetta Bartolucci ◽  
Patrizia Contursi

Chemosphere ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (9) ◽  
pp. 1874-1878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh P. Rastogi ◽  
Rajeshwar P. Sinha ◽  
Aran Incharoensakdi

2012 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
pp. 1267-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Voskamp ◽  
C.A. Bodmann ◽  
H.G. Rebel ◽  
G.E. Koehl ◽  
C.P. Tensen ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 071027164408001-??? ◽  
Author(s):  
Cara L. Benjamin ◽  
Stephen E. Ullrich ◽  
Margaret L. Kripke ◽  
Honnavara N. Ananthaswamy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document