Clinical Tips of Cesarean Section in Case of Breech, Transverse Presentation, and Incarcerated Uterus

Cesarean section in breech or transverse presentation involves more complicated procedures than cesarean section in cephalic presentation because the former requires additional manipulations for guiding the presenting part of the fetus, liberation of the arms, and the after-coming head delivery; therefore, those cesarean sections are likely to be more invasive. Making a rather wide uterine incision to prevent uterine injury during delivery of the fetus facilitates smooth delivery of the fetus. Furthermore, in cases of breech or transverse presentation, it is important to initially identify the presenting part of the fetus and guide it to the incision opening in the lower uterine segment, because delivering the presenting part of the fetus first is a basic rule of delivery of the fetus. Smooth delivery of the fetus by means of breech extraction can prevent excessive stress or injury to the fetus. Therefore, it is important to acquire the knowledge and skills necessary to perform these techniques, including the internal version. Smooth delivery of the fetus is also less invasive for the mother because an extension of the uterine excision or injury to arteries and veins in the uterus and parametrium can be avoided. Incarcerated uterus occurring in cases of pregnancy with intrapelvic adhesion, endometriosis, cervical myoma, or extended cervix may result in excessive uterine and cervical injury when a transverse incision of the lower uterine segment is performed without caution. These conditions may result in difficulty in fetal delivery. Therefore, it is important to identify risks in advance and to choose the incision line with great care. Countermeasures for difficult delivery of the fetus need to be mastered by all practitioners of obstetrics. If the transverse incision fails to reach the uterine cavity, an inverted T-shaped or J-shaped incision should be made. Risks of complications such as injury to the cervical canal, the vagina, the bladder or ureter, and massive hemorrhage must be kept in mind.

REVERSE BREECH EXTRACTION AT CESAREAN SECTION IN SECOND STAGE OF LABOR

The aim: Taking into consideration the increase in the frequency of urgent C-sections in the second stage of labor and significant technical difficulties in the extraction of deeply impacted fetal head during this operation, the aim of our work was to analyze the current published biomedical data to identify the optimal technical strategies for conducting this type of surgical interventions. Materials and methods: The search and analysis of current clinical data available in PubMed was performed. We analyzed 9 retrospective and randomized prospective studies with collected data from a total of 974 women (2002-2019). Conclusions: Analysis of nine prospective and retrospective studies, comparing reverse breech extraction with abdominovaginal technique, revealed a significant advantage and safety of reverse breech extraction. This procedure has been associated with the decrease of traumatic uncontrolled extension of uterine incisions in 2.3-10 times, the time of surgical intervention decreased by 6.5-33 minutes, and intraoperative blood loss was less by 149.5-444 ml as compared with abdominovaginal delivery. Moreover, less intra- and postoperative complications were observed. In conclusion, reverse breech extraction during cesarean section with impacted fetal head is a safe delivery technique that helps to significantly decrease the incidence of maternal complications.

Simulation of an impacted fetal head extraction during cesarean section: description of the creation and evaluation of a new training program

Background Although cesarean sections at full dilatation are increasing, training in delivering a deeply impacted fetal head is lacking among obstetricians. The purpose of the study was to implement and evaluate a theoretical and simulation-based training program for this obstetrical emergency. Methods We developed a training program consisting of a theoretical introduction presenting a clinical algorithm, developed on the basis of the available literature, followed by a simulation session. We used the Kirkpatrick’s framework to evaluate the program. A questionnaire was distributed, directly before, immediately and 6 weeks after the training. Self-perceived competencies were evaluated on a 6-point Likert scale. Pre- and post-test differences in the Likert scale were measured with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Additionally, the training sessions were video recorded and rated with a checklist in relation to how well the algorithm was followed. Results Eleven residents and eight senior physicians took part to the training. More than 40% of participants experienced a comparable situation after the course during clinical work. Their knowledge and self-perceived competencies improved immediately after the training program and 6 weeks later. Major improvements were seen in the awareness of the algorithm and in the confidence in performing the reverse breech extraction (14.3% of the participants felt confident with the maneuver in the pre-training assessment compared with 66.7% 6 week post-training). Conclusion Our theoretical and simulation-based training program was successful in improving knowledge and confidence of the participants in delivering a deeply impacted fetal head during a cesarean section performed at full dilation.