Sources of nitrous oxide and fate of mineral nitrogen in sub-Arctic permafrost peat soils

Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from permafrost-affected terrestrial ecosystems have received little attention, largely because they have been thought to be negligible. Recent studies, however, have shown that there are habitats in subarctic tundra emitting N2O at high rates, such as bare peat surfaces on permafrost peatlands. The processes behind N2O production in these high-emitting habitats are, however, poorly understood. In this study, we established an in situ 15N-labelling experiment with the main objectives to partition the microbial sources of N2O emitted from bare peat surfaces (BP) on permafrost peatlands and to study the fate of ammonium and nitrate in these soils and in adjacent vegetated peat surfaces (VP) showing low N2O emissions. Our results confirm the hypothesis that denitrification is mostly responsible for the high N2O emissions from BP surfaces. During the study period denitrification contributed with ~79 % of the total N2O emission in BP, while the contribution of ammonia oxidation was less, about 19 %. However, nitrification is a key process for the overall N2O production in these soils with negligible external nitrogen (N) load because it is responsible for nitrite/nitrate supply for denitrification, as also supported by relatively high gross nitrification rates in BP. Generally, both gross N mineralization and gross nitrification rates were much higher in BP with high N2O emissions than in VP, where the high C / N ratio together with low water content was likely limiting N mineralization and nitrification and, consequently, N2O production. Also, competition for mineral N between plants and microbes was additionally limiting N availability for N2O production in VP. Our results show that multiple factors control N2O production in permafrost peatlands, the absence of plants being a key factor together with inter-mediate to high water content and low C / N ratio, all factors which also impact on gross N turnover rates. The intermediate to high soil water content which creates anaerobic microsites in BP is a key N2O emission driver for the prevalence of denitrification to occur. This knowledge is important for evaluating future permafrost –N feedback loops from the Arctic.

Time Since Rewetting Defines Vegetation Composition and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes on Former Milled Peatlands - Comparison With Undisturbed Bogs

Rewetting is the most common restoration approach for milled peatlands in Europe, with the aim of creating suitable conditions for the development of peatland specific plant cover and carbon accumulation. Therefore, it is important to determine if time since rewetting is pivotal for milled peatlands to become functionally and structurally similar to their undisturbed counterparts. We investigate the temporal succession in rewetted peatlands in Estonia by a chronosequence of 4, 15, and 35 years before the measurements. Plant functional type (PFT) cover and biomass, bryophyte production and CO2 fluxes were measured on two milled peatlands, as well as undisturbed bogs adjacent to milled peatlands. Differences in vegetation composition and CO2 fluxes between the sites were greater for rewetted than undisturbed sites. The most recently rewetted site was mainly covered in bare peat and Eriophorum vaginatum and was a CO2 source. On the rewetted site of 15 years, Sphagnum was present in addition to ombrotrophic sedges, and in the rewetted site of 35 years, lawn-hollow microtopography is starting to develop with various PFTs. Both of these sites were CO2 sinks. Lawn Sphagnum was abundant on the two older rewetted sites, and was connected with CO2 sink functioning in the rewetted sites. Still, hummock Sphagnum species, which were present in undisturbed bogs, were absent from all of the rewetted sites. With time, CO2 fluxes, microtopography and vegetation develop after rewetting in the direction of undisturbed bogs, while vegetation composition still differs from the reference sites even 35 years after rewetting.

Insights into CO2 simulations from the Irish Blackwater peatland using ECOSSE model

<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>Non-degraded peatlands are known to be important carbon sink; however, if they are exposed to anthropogenic changes they can act as carbon source. This study forms a part of the larger AUGER project (http://www.ucd.ie/auger). It uses the ECOSSE process-based model to predict CO<sub>2</sub> emissions [heterotrophic respiration (Rh)] associated with different peatland management (Smith et al., 2010). The work aims to provide preliminary insights into CO<sub>2</sub> modelling procedures for drained and rewetted sites from Blackwater, the former Irish raised bog. After drainage in 1950’s (due to peat-extraction) and cessation of draining in 1999, the landscape developed drained ‘Bare Peat’ (BP), and rewetted ‘Reeds’ (R) and ‘Sedges’ (S) sites (Renou-Wilson et al., 2019). Modelling of CO<sub>2</sub> from these sites was done using ECOSSE-v.6.2b model (‘site-specific’ mode) with water-table (WT) module (Smith et al., 2010), and default peatland vegetation parameters. The other model-input parameters (including soil respiration, WT and other soil parameters) were obtained from measurements reported in Renou-Wilson et al. (2019). Simulations on drained BP site were run starting from 1950 and on rewetted R and S sites starting from 1999 (which is the year of cessation of drainage). The climate data inputs (2010-2017) were obtained from ICHEC (EPA_Climate-WRF, 2019). The long-term average climate data for model spin-up were obtained from Met Éireann (2012) with potential evapotranspiration estimated by Thornthwaite (1948) method. Daily ecosystem respiration (Reco) data for May/June 2011 to Aug 2011 obtained from raw CO<sub>2</sub> flux measurements (Renou-Wilson et al., 2019) were used. For vegetated sites Rh was estimated from Reco using method explained in Abdalla et al. (2014). Daily CO<sub>2</sub> simulations were compared to Reco for BP site (r<sup>2</sup> =0.20) and to Rh for R site (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.35) and S site (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.55). The preliminary results showed some underestimation of simulated CO<sub>2 </sub>indicating the need for further modelling refinements for satisfactory results. The results from BP site further indicated on the importance of including long-term drainage period (i.e. from 1950 on) because avoiding this step resulted in a large overestimation of predicted CO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Acknowledgements</strong></p><p>AUGER project is funded under the Irish EPA Research programme 2014-2020.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Literature</strong></p><p>Abdalla, M., et al. 2014. Simulation of CO<sub>2</sub> and attribution analysis at six European peatland sites using the ECOSSE Model. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2182.</p><p>EPA_Climate-WRF (2019). ERDDAPv.1.82. ICHEC. https://erddap.ichec.ie/erddap/files/EPA_Climate/WRF/</p><p>Met Éireann. 2012. 30 year averages. Met Éireann - The Irish Meteorological Service, Ireland.</p><p>Renou-Wilson, F., et. al. 2019. Rewetting degraded peatlands for climate and biodiversity benefits: Results from two raised bogs. Ecol. Eng. 127:547-560.</p><p>Smith, J., et al. 2010. ECOSSE. User Manual.</p><p>Thornthwaite, C.W. 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geog. Review 38, 55-94.</p>

Sphagnum reintroduction under a warming climate: keys to success

<p>Restoring peatland functioning is closely related to restoring growth of ecosystem engineering Sphagnum species. In strongly degenerated peatlands reintroducing diaspores of Sphagnum is necessary to overcome strong dispersal and establishment bottlenecks. Which reintroduction strategy varies between peatland types, surface properties and/or microclimate. Comparative analyses of restoration techniques is scarce, hampering informed management choices.    </p><p>We set out to assess keys to success for Sphagnum reintroduction on strongly humified bare peat in three degraded and long-time rewetted temperate peatlands in the Netherlands. To this end we experimentally manipulated water table position (control, extra water), type of abiotic shelter (control, nurse plants, mulch), Sphagnum species (S. magellanicum, S. papillosum and S. cuspidatum), species mixture (monoculture, mixed culture), diaspore size (clumped intact plants or fragments) and diaspore density (0, 36, 72, 156 plants/m<sup>2</sup>) and monitored Sphagnum survival, lateral expansion and environmental conditions. The experiment was established in 2018 and repeated in 2019, covering two of the most extreme summers in recorded history.</p><p>Water table close to the surface and shelter of a mulch layer were key to Sphagnum survival and growth irrespective of Sphagnum species, reintroduction method or year. Survival increased linearly with diaspore density. Diaspore size showed an interaction with mulch cover: fragments did best under mulch cover, whereas clumped plants survived better outside shelter.</p><p>Taken together our results suggest that successful reintroduction of Sphagnum is possible under a warming climate, but that strategies should be strongly focussed on amelioration of abiotic stress even when water tables are close to the surface. </p>

Stormflow behaviour in blanket peat catchments affected by severe wildfire: implications for natural flood management

<p>The restoration of damaged UK peatlands is a major conservation concern, and landscape-scale restoration is extensive in areas of upland Britain. Peatland headwater catchments are important areas of hillslope runoff production, and over the last decade there has been increasing focus on how restoration schemes can reduce downstream flood risk through natural flood management (NFM). Stormflow in degraded catchments can be incredibly flashy, as water is quickly evacuated from hillslopes across bare peat surfaces and through erosional gullies, but there is increasing evidence that restoration by revegetation and damming of channels can significantly slow the flow of water.</p><p>Recent major peatland wildfires in the UK have focused attention on the effects of wildfire and post-wildfire restoration on the hydrology of peatland catchments, but to date, relatively little is known about the effects of wildfire on peatland flood hydrology. Current understanding is largely drawn from process studies, with evidence suggesting that severely burnt peatlands will have flashier hydrograph responses to rainfall events, with higher peak flows relative to unburnt peatlands. This assumption is based on three key factors which promote rapid overland flow: (i) the development of hydrophobic crusts due to high intensity fires, (ii) the clogging of peat pores by ash, and (iii) removal of vegetation cover reducing surface roughness. Further influences on runoff production could result from changes in water table or post-fire peat shrinkage and cracking.</p><p>This paper details stormflow characteristics from nine gullies in an area of peatland affected by the high-severity Saddleworth wildfire which burned over 1000 hectares of UK peatland in June and July 2018. This field area is upstream of the community of Stalybridge, which the Environment Agency had highlighted as a priority community at risk of flooding. We compare this behaviour to catchments that were unaffected by the fire. Preliminary findings suggest that the fire affected gullies produce highly variable stormflow behaviour, with some sites producing discharges similar to bare peat sites, while others are more similar to relatively intact catchments. The planned restoration of this area has great potential to provide NFM benefits.</p>

Multi-year methane ebullition measurements from water and bare peat surfaces of a patterned boreal bog

We measured methane ebullition from a patterned boreal bog situated in the Siikaneva wetland complex in southern Finland. Measurements were conducted on water (W) and bare peat surfaces (BP) in three growing seasons (2014–2016) using floating gas traps. The volume of the trapped gas was measured weekly, and methane and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations of bubbles were analysed from fresh bubble samples that were collected separately. We applied a mixed-effect model to quantify the effect of the environmental controlling factors on the ebullition. Ebullition was higher from W than from BP, and more bubbles were released from open water (OW) than from the water's edge (EW). On average, ebullition rate was the highest in the wettest year (2016) and ranged between 0 and 253 mg m−2 d−1 with a median of 2 mg m−2 d−1, 0 and 147 mg m−2 d−1 with a median of 3 mg m−2 d−1, and 0 and 186 mg m−2 d−1 with a median of 28 mg m−2 d−1 in 2014, 2015, and 2016, respectively. Ebullition increased together with increasing peat temperature, weekly air temperature sum and atmospheric pressure, and decreasing water table (WT). Methane concentration in the bubbles released from W was 15–20 times higher than the CO2 concentration, and from BP it was 10 times higher. The proportion of ebullition fluxes upscaled to ecosystem level for the peak season was 2 %–8 % and 2 %–5 % of the total flux measured with eddy covariance technique and with chambers and gas traps, respectively. Thus, the contribution of methane ebullition from wet non-vegetated surfaces of the bog to the total ecosystem-scale methane emission appeared to be small.

Multiyear methane ebullition measurements from water and bare peat surfaces of a patterned boreal bog

We measured methane ebullition from a patterned boreal bog situated in the Siikaneva wetland complex in southern Finland. Measurements were conducted on water (W) and bare peat surfaces (BP) in three growing seasons 2014–2016 using floating gas traps. The volume of the trapped gas was measured weekly, and methane and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations of bubbles were analyzed from fresh bubble samples collected separately. We applied a mixed effects model to quantify the effect of the environmental controlling factors on the ebullition. Ebullition was higher from W than from BP, and more bubbles were released from open water (OW) than from water's edge (EW). On average, ebullition rate was the highest in the wettest year 2016 and ranged between 0–253 mg m−2 d−1, 0–147 mg m−2 d−1 and 0–186 mg m−2 d−1 in 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively. Ebullition increased together with increasing peat temperature, weekly air temperature sum and atmospheric pressure, and decreasing water table (WT). Methane concentration in the bubbles released from W was 15–20 times higher and from BP 10 times higher than their CO2 concentration. The proportion of ebullition fluxes upscaled to ecosystem level for the peak season was 2–8 % and 2–5 % of the total flux measured with eddy covariance technique and with chambers and gas traps, respectively. Thus, the contribution of methane ebullition from wet non-vegetated surfaces of the bog to the total ecosystem-scale methane emission appeared to be small.