hippoglossoides elassodon
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 201 (2) ◽  
pp. 400-415
Author(s):  
R. T. Ovcherenko ◽  
D. Ya. Saushkina

Distribution and biological parameters are considered for eggs and adults of two flatfish species on the data of annual surveys conducted on the shelf of southeastern Kamchatka in summer of 2011–2014 and 2016–2019. The eggs of Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus were sampled mostly at the stage of a germinal strip forming, whereas the eggs of Hippoglossoides elassodon were mostly at the stage of embryo cleavage. The main congestions of the eggs were found in the Kronotsky Bay and northern Avachinsky Bay. The adults of both species concentrated mainly in the northern Kronotsky Bay, at Cape Povorotny. Old age groups prevailed in aggregations of P. quadrituberculatus, but middle-age and young fish — in the aggregations of H. elassodon.


2002 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul D Spencer ◽  
Thomas K Wilderbuer ◽  
Chang Ik Zhang

A variety of eastern Bering Sea (EBS) flatfish including yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera), rock sole (Lepidopsetta bilineata), flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon), and Alaska plaice (Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus), co-occur in various degrees in EBS trawl fisheries, impeding attempts to obtain single-species management targets. A further complication is the bycatch of Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis); halibut bycatch limits, rather than single-species catch quotas, have been the primary factor regulating EBS flatfish harvest in recent years. To examine bycatch interactions among the EBS flatfish listed above, an equilibrium mixed-species multifishery model was developed. Equilibrium yield curves, scaled by recent average recruitment, are flat topped or asymptotically increasing, reflecting low fishing selectivity during the first several years of life and low growth relative to natural mortality. A linear programming analysis indicated that relaxation of the halibut bycatch constraint at the optimal solution of catch by fishery would produce approximately 20 times more flatfish yield than a similar relaxation of any flatfish catch quota. A strategy for establishing halibut bycatch limits that considers the foregone revenue in the halibut and flatfish trawl fisheries reveals how the choice of halibut bycatch limit is affected by the management goal for the flatfish complex.


2000 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 2410-2419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A McConnaughey ◽  
Keith R Smith

Spatially explicit relationships between pleuronectid flatfish abundance and surficial sediments in the eastern Bering Sea were investigated using published sediment descriptions and trawl survey data (1982-1994). Flatfish food habits were also examined because sediment properties are known to affect the distribution and abundance of benthic prey. For six species, we compared sediment textures in areas of highest and lowest abundance (kilograms per hectare). Sand predominated in areas of high yellowfin sole (Pleuronectes asper) (YFS) (p << 0.001) and rock sole (Lepidopsetta spp.) (RS) (p << 0.001) abundance, while mixed sand and mud was most common in areas of lowest abundance. In contrast, mixed sand and mud predominated in areas preferred by flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon) (FHS) (p << 0.001), Alaska plaice (Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus) (AP) (p = 0.002), and arrowtooth flounder (Atheresthes stomias) (ATF) (p = 0.004), with more diverse substrates in low-density areas. Areas of high and low Greenland turbot (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) (GT) (p = 0.845) abundance had similar sediment textures (primarily mixed sand and mud). Species with highly restricted diets (AP) or piscivores with weak sediment associations (GT, ATF) had relatively inflexible food habits, whereas YFS, RS, and FHS food habits varied considerably with sediment type. Our findings suggest that benthic-feeding pleuronectids prefer certain sediment textures because of adaptive differences in prey availability.


1990 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 875-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. McMaster ◽  
H. Itoh ◽  
K. L. MacCannell ◽  
J. Rivier ◽  
C. Rivier ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document