The Transitions To Long-Term In Home Ventilator Engagement Study (Transitions To LIVE): Study Protocol For A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial

Background Overview and Rationale: We co-developed a multi-component virtual care solution (TtLIVE) for the home mechanical ventilation (HMV) population using the aTouchAway™ platform (Aetonix). The TtLIVE intervention includes: 1) virtual home visits; 2) customizable care plans; 3) clinical workflows that incorporate reminders, completion of symptom profiles and tele-monitoring; and 4) digitally secure communication via messaging, audio, and video calls;5) Resource library including print and audiovisual material. Objectives and Brief Methods: Our primary objective is to evaluate the TtLIVE intervention compared to a usual care control group using an eight centre, pragmatic, parallel group single blind (outcome assessors) randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients are children and adults newly transitioning to HMV in Ontario, Canada. Our target sample size is 440 participants (220 each arm). Our co-primary outcomes are number of Emergency Department (ED) visits in the 12 months after randomization and change in family caregiver (FC) reported Pearlin Mastery Scale score from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes also measured in the 12 months post randomization include healthcare utilization measured using a hybrid Ambulatory Home Care Record (AHCR-hybrid), FC burden using the Zarit Burden Interview, and health-related quality of life using the EQ-5D. In addition, we will conduct a cost-utility analysis over a one- year time horizon and measure process outcomes including healthcare provider time using the Care Coordination Measurement Tool. We will use qualitative interviews in a subset of study participants to understand acceptability, barriers, and facilitators to the TtLIVE intervention. We will administer the Family Experiences with Care Coordination (FECC) to interview participants. We will use Poisson regression for number of ED visits at 12 months. We will use linear regression for the Pearlin Mastery scale score at 12 months. We will adjust for the baseline score to estimate the effect of the intervention on the primary outcomes. Analysis of secondary outcomes will employ regression, causal, and linear mixed modelling. Primary analysis will follow intention-to-treat principles. We have Research Ethics Board approval from SickKids, Children’s Hospital Eastern Ontario, McMaster Children’s Hospital, Children’s Hospital-London Health Sciences, Sunnybrook Hospital, London Health Sciences, West Park Healthcare Centre and Ottawa Hospital. Discussion: This pragmatic randomized controlled single blind trial will determine effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the TtLIVE virtual care solution compared to usual care while providing important data on patient and family experience, as well as process measures such as healthcare provider time to deliver the intervention. Trial registration: NCT04180722.

Patient Care in Emergency and Critical Care Medicine: An Interview with Dr. Robert Arntfield

Dr. Robert Arntfield is a critical care intensivist and traumatologist at London Health Sciences Center where he also acts as the medical director of the Critical Care Trauma Unit. Originally interested in emergency medicine, he then carved his pathway to enter the realm of critical care. Dr. Arntfield is a world-renowned expert in critical care ultrasonography and lectures globally on the topic. He is currently working in collaboration with multiple artificial intelligence and technology companies to advance the applications of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS). We had the opportunity to talk to Dr. Arntfield about the field of critical care medicine at LHSC, in Canadian healthcare, and the significance of the POCUS within the field.

Correlation between Medication Administration–Related Errors in Patients with Parkinson Disease and Timing of Pharmacy-Led Best Possible Medication Histories

Background: Poor prescribing and incomplete medication administration have been linked to increased lengths of hospitalization for patients with Parkinson disease. The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) has recommended that patients with Parkinson disease receive a pharmacy consultation within 2 h of admission to hospital. Objectives: To examine whether the time for a pharmacy team member to obtain a best possible medication history (BPMH) was associated with administration-related medication errors. The primary outcome was the proportion of doses with a medication error during a patient’s admission in relation to the time to completion of the initial BPMH by a registered pharmacist (RPh) or registered pharmacy technician (RPhT). The secondary objective was to compare the proportion of doses with a medication error in relation to whether the BPMH was completed by an RPh or an RPhT. Methods: This retrospective chart review involved patients with Parkinson disease who were admitted to the medicine services at London Health Sciences Centre from September 30, 2014, to September 30, 2018. Patients were included if they had Parkinson disease and a medication regimen that included levodopa-carbidopa. For all patients, an RPhT or RPh conducted the initial BPMH or updated the BPMH. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine whether a correlation existed between administration-related errors and completion of the BPMH by a pharmacy staff member. Results: A total of 84 patients with 104 admissions were included. There was no significant correlation between the time to completion of the initial BPMH by a pharmacy team member and the proportion of doses with medication errors (p = 0.32). Although RPhTs completed the BPMHs more quickly than RPhs (p < 0.001), there was no significant difference between pharmacy team members in terms of the proportion of doses with medication errors (p = 0.86). Conclusions: Completing a BPMH within 2 h of a patient’s admission, as per the ISMP recommendation, is unlikely to affect administration-related medication errors, given that no correlation was identified. Expediting BPMH without addressing other factors is insufficient, and initiatives are required to improve the medication administration process. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : La mauvaise prescription et l’administration incomplète de médicaments ont été liées à une augmentation de la durée du séjour à l’hôpital des patients atteints de la maladie de Parkinson. L’Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) a recommandé que les patients atteints de la maladie de Parkinson obtiennent une consultation en pharmacie dans les 2 heures après leur admission à l’hôpital. Objectifs : Vérifier si le temps d’attente pour l’obtention, par un membre de l’équipe de la pharmacie, du meilleur schéma thérapeutique possible (MSTP) était associé ou non à des erreurs de médication liées à l’administration. Le résultat principal portait sur la proportion des doses comportant une erreur de médication lors de l’admission d’un patient par rapport au temps nécessaire à un pharmacien ou à un technicien en pharmacie autorisés pour réaliser le MSTP initial. L’objectif secondaire visait à comparer la proportion des doses comportant une erreur de médication entre un MSTP réalisé par un pharmacien autorisé et un MSTP réalisé par un technicien en pharmacie autorisé. Méthodes : Cet examen rétrospectif des dossiers impliquait des patients atteints de la maladie de Parkinson ayant été admis aux services de médecine au London Health Sciences Centre entre le 30 septembre 2014 et le 30 septembre 2018. Les patients pouvaient participer à l’étude s’ils avaient la maladie de Parkinson et qu’ils suivaient un traitement médicamenteux comprenant du lévodopa-carbidopa. Un pharmacien autorisé ou un technicien en pharmacie autorisé réalisait ou actualisait le MSTP initial de tous les patients. La corrélation de Pearson a servi à déterminer s’il existait une corrélation entre les erreurs liées à l’administration et la réalisation du MSTP par un membre du personnel de la pharmacie. Résultats : Au total, 84 patients correspondant à 104 admissions ont été inclus dans l’étude. Il n’y avait aucune corrélation importante entre le moment de la réalisation du MSTP initial par un membre du personnel de la pharmacie et la proportion des doses comportant des erreurs de médication (p = 0,32). Bien que les techniciens en pharmacie autorisés aient terminé plus rapidement leur MSTP que les pharmaciens autorisés (p < 0,001), aucune différence importante n’a été notée entre les membres du personnel de la pharmacie en termes de proportion des doses et d’erreur de médication (p = 0,86). Conclusions : Il est peu probable que la réalisation d’un MSTP dans les 2 heures après l’admission d’un patient, conformément à la recommandation de l’ISMP, ait une influence sur les erreurs de médication liées à l’administration, vu qu’aucune corrélation n’a été décelée. Précipiter la réalisation du MSTP sans aborder les autres facteurs ne suffit pas et des actions sont nécessaires pour améliorer le processus d’administration des médicaments.

Navigating Naturopathic Remedies in Oncology

The use of naturopathic and other alternative forms of cancer treatment are pervasive, and many patients may firmly believe in their effectiveness. This can present headwinds for physicians who have been trained to incorporate evidence-based practices into their care. This underscores the need for health care providers to be cognizant of the impact of these alternative therapies; it is imperative to understand patient perspectives regarding their use and find middle ground where it exists. We had the opportunity to speak with Dr. David Palma, who is a radiation oncologist and clinician-scientist at the London Health Sciences Centre who has had a vested interest in improving patient access to quality cancer treatment. In this article, Dr. Palma discusses his thoughts about the rising trend of alternative cancer treatments, and how we as future physicians can reconcile with their growing influence.

Cohort profile: he East London Health and Care Partnership Data Repository: using novel integrated data to support commissioning and research

PurposeThe East London Health and Care Partnership (ELHCP) Data Repository was established to support commissioning decisions in London. This dataset comprises routine clinical data for the general practitioner (GP)-registered populations of two London boroughs, Tower Hamlets and City and Hackney, and provides a rich source of demographic, clinical and health service use data of relevance to clinicians, commissioners, researchers and policy makers. This paper describes the dataset in its current form, its representativeness and data completeness.ParticipantsThere were 351 749 and 344 511 members of the GP-registered population in the two boroughs, respectively, for the financial year 2017/2018. Demographic information and prevalence data were available for 9 mental health and 15 physical health conditions. Prevalence rates from the cohort were compared with local and national data. In order to illustrate the health service use data available in the dataset, emergency department use across mental health conditions was described. Information about data completeness was provided.Findings to dateThe ELHCP Data Repository provides a rich source of information about a relatively young, urban, ethnically diverse, population within areas of socioeconomic deprivation. Prevalence data were in line with local and national statistics with some exceptions. Physical health conditions were more common in those with mental health conditions, reflecting that comorbidities are the norm rather than the exception. This has implications for integrated care. Data completeness for risk factors (eg, blood pressure, cholesterol) was high in patients with long-term conditions.Future plansThe data are being further cleaned and evaluated using imputation, Bayesian and economic methods, principally focusing on specific cohorts, including type II diabetes, depression and personality disorder. Data continue to be collected for the foreseeable future to support commissioning decisions, which will also enable more long-term prospective analysis as data become available at the end of each financial year.

Epilepsy Related Death: the London Health Sciences Center Experience

Premature mortality among epilepsy patients is well recognized. Except a few identifiable causes of unnatural death, more than half of the epilepsy related death remains unexplained after extensive workup. These cases are classified as sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). SUDEP incidence varies significantly depending on the population, the methods documenting cause of death and the availability of Neuropathological examination. An accurate diagnosis of the cause of death is needed for epilepsy related death. The goal of this study is to present the relevant clinical data, the general autopsy and Neuropathology findings of epilepsy related death investigated in London Health Sciences Center during the period of 2000 to 2011. We identified 71 cases with known history of chronic epilepsy. In the 29 cases of epilepsy associated death, the causes of death have been classified as cardiac, pulmonary, accidental (e.g. drowning), toxic (e.g. drug overdose) and non-related causes. Forty two cases are considered to be SUDEP, and were categorized according to the recently proposed SUDEP Definition and Classification. Half of the SUDEP cases have no specific Neuropathological findings. The most common identifiable lesions in SUDEP cases are perinatal/neonatal destructive lesions (29%), hippocampal sclerosis (24%), and focal cortical dysplasia (20%). These are followed by neuronal heterotopia (9%), previous head trauma (9%), and cavernoma (5%).LEARNING OBJECTIVESThis presentation will enable the learner to:1.Review cause of death in epilepsy related deaths2.Discuss the practice guideline in neuropathology autopsy of epilepsy related deaths

Reducing red blood cell folate testing: a case study in utilisation management

Mandatory enrichment of wheat flour in Canada with folic acid since 1998 has caused folate deficiency to be rare. There were 3019 red blood cell (RBC) folate tests performed during an 18-month period at London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC)/St. Joseph’s Healthcare London (SJHC) without any folate deficiency detected. We implemented a quality improvement initiative to reduce RBC folate testing at LHSC/SJHC. We began with a retrospective review of RBC folate tests performed during the previous 18 months. We identified physicians who had ordered more than five tests during this period and sent them an educational email to inform them of our intentions and solicit their input. We then discontinued RBC folate testing in-house and a pop-up window was introduced to the computerised physician order entry system stating that biochemist approval would be needed before samples would be sent out for testing. During the audited 18-month period, the average monthly test volume was 168 (SD 20). The three departments ordering the most RBC folate testing were nephrology (15%), haematology (7%) and oncology (7%). Physician feedback was supportive of the change, and during the 2 months after targeted email correspondence, the average monthly test volume decreased 24% (p<0.01) to 128 (SD 1). On discontinuation of the test in-house and implementation of the pop-up, the average monthly test volume decreased another 74% (p<0.01) to 3 (SD 2). In the 10 months following discontinuation of the test on-site, there were only 39 RBC folate tests performed with no deficiency detected. This initiative significantly reduced unnecessary RBC folate orders. The change in ordering on email contact suggests that physician education was an important factor reducing overutilisation. However, the most significant decrease came from restricting the test so that only orders approved by a biochemist would be performed.

A Canadian Academic Hospital’s Initial MAID Experience: A Health-Care Systems Review

Background: Following the Supreme Court of Canada’s Carter Decision, medical assistance in dying (MAID) became possible with individual court orders in February 2016. Subsequently, on June 17, 2016, legislation was passed that eliminated the need for court orders, essentially making physicians the arbiters of these requests. Canadian health-care facilities now face the challenge of addressing this unprecedented patient health-care need. Aim: To describe the manner in which London Health Sciences Center has approached local and regional requests for MAID, including the administration, ethics, privacy, and clinical process. Design: A health-care systems descriptive study. Setting/Participants: Between June 6, 2016, and May 30, 2018, London Health Sciences Center’s MAID Internal Resource Committee triaged and referred 260 cases. Ninety-six received the requisite assessments were deemed eligible for and received MAID. Results: The procedure was completed in hospital 59 (61%) times, and 37 (39%) times in the community (either private residence or long-Term Care facility). Nineteen patients did not meet MAID criteria and 63 patients died while awaiting the procedure. The median wait time between first request and referral was 1 day. The median time between referral and the procedure was 12.0 days. The ratio of referrals to completed cases is 96 of 260 (or 37% conversion rate). Conclusion: Our MAID processes, including our committee structure, referral triage process, and physical site have all undergone extensive review and improvement cycles throughout these first 2 years with the aim of ensuring that this procedure is managed in a respectful, confidential, safe, efficient, and patient-centered manner.