restriction homomorphism
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kento Fujita

AbstractFor a log Fano manifold (X,D) with D ≠ 0 and of the log Fano pseudoindex ≥2, we prove that the restriction homomorphism Pic(X) → Pic(D 1) of Picard groups is injective for any irreducible component D 1 ⊂ D. The strategy of our proof is to run a certain minimal model program and is similar to Casagrande’s argument. As a corollary, we prove that the Mukai conjecture (resp. the generalized Mukai conjecture) implies the log Mukai conjecture (resp. the log generalized Mukai conjecture).


2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
pp. 169-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
EYAL MARKMAN

Let S[n]be the Hilbert scheme of length n subschemes of a K3 surface S. H2(S[n],ℤ) is endowed with the Beauville–Bogomolov bilinear form. Denote by Mon the subgroup of GL [H*(S[n],ℤ)] generated by monodromy operators, and let Mon2be its image in OH2(S[n],ℤ). We prove that Mon2is the subgroup generated by reflections with respect to +2 and -2 classes (Theorem 1.2). Thus Mon2does not surject onto OH2(S[n],ℤ)/(±1), when n - 1 is not a prime power.As a consequence, we get counterexamples to a version of the weight 2 Torelli question for hyperKähler varieties X deformation equivalent to S[n]. The weight 2 Hodge structure on H2(X,ℤ) does not determine the bimeromorphic class of X, whenever n - 1 is not a prime power (the first case being n = 7). There are at least 2ρ(n - 1) - 1distinct bimeromorphic classes of X with a given generic weight 2 Hodge structure, where ρ(n - 1) is the Euler number of n - 1.The second main result states, that if a monodromy operator acts as the identity on H2(S[n],ℤ), then it acts as the identity on Hk(S[n],ℤ), 0 ≤ k ≤ n + 2 (Theorem 1.5). We conclude the injectivity of the restriction homomorphism Mon → Mon2, if n ≡ 0 or n ≡ 1 modulo 4 (Corollary 1.6).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document