Comparison of Tramadol Versus Tramadol and Paracetamol in Postop Pain Management after C-Section

Background: Multimodal technique of pain control is better than unimodal technique in perioperative time. Both tramadol and paracetamol are commonly used for pain control. Aim: To compare the tramadol alone versus tramadol with paracetamol in pain management after C- section. Method: 150 patients with ASA class P1&P2 undergoing elective cesarean section under general anesthesia were included in this study and were divided into group A & B by random number table. In both group tramadol 1mg/kg body weight intravenous was given after delivery of baby and in group B intravenous paracetamol 15 mg/kg body weight was given additionally and same doses were given in postop after 8 hours for 24 hs of post-surgery. Result: Mean age in group A was 31.04±5.35 years and in group B it was 29.64±5.92. Mean pain score in group A was 1.19±0.81 and in group B it was 0.60±0.75. The degree of pain was low in group B and patients were more comfortable as compared to group A patients. Conclusion: Tramadol plus paracetamol has better pain control as compared to tramadol alone. Keywords: Tramadol, Paracetamol, Cesarean Section, VAS.

Endoscopic treatment of iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up and comparison of tenotomy performed at the acetabular rim versus lesser trochanter

Iliopsoas impingement is an underdiagnosed cause of groin pain after total hip arthroplasty (THA), being responsible for 4.4% of cases. Non-surgical treatment may be effective in ∼50% of cases. Endoscopic surgery has gained popularity as an option for non-responsive patients because of its non-invasive characteristics, faster recovery and encouraging results. This study compares two different sites of endoscopic psoas tenotomy performed following THA: at the edge of the acetabulum (AR) versus at the lesser trochanter (LT). This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from a single-surgeon case series. Thirty-five iliopsoas tenotomy cases which had >24-month follow-up were identified. There were 21 tenotomies at the lesser trochanter. Demographic data, preop and postop pain, mHHS and NAHS scores, strength and patient satisfaction data were collected and analysed. Average age at the time of surgery was 62. Mean follow-up for the LT group was 49.11 months and 42.42 months for the AR group. Pain decreased significantly for both groups (P < 0.001). Both mHHS and NAHS showed superiority in the LT group, but this difference did not reach significance (P = 0.06). LT patients showed better strength with 71.42% of them having normal strength at latest follow-up, compared with 41.6% in the AR group. There were no complications in either group. Endoscopic tenotomy is a safe and reliable surgical option, giving significant pain relief and good functional outcomes. Tenotomy at the level of the lesser trochanter might be preferable since it shows better outcomes. Larger studies are necessary to achieve statistically significant results.

ARTHROSCOPIC WAFER RESECTION FOR ULNAR IMPACTION SYNDROME: PREDICTION OF OUTCOMES

Twenty-six patients with mean age of 38.5 (range 18–59), from 1998 to 2005, with ulnar impaction syndrome who failed nonoperative treatments were included in our study. Patients' age, history of previous wrist fracture, presence of MRI signs and ulnar variance were recorded as variables. Also, patients' postoperative strength (compared to the contralateral wrist) and pain relief were collected as outcome measurements. Twenty-two patients (84.6%) had either good or excellent pain relief (median 4, range 1–4). Significant correlation was found between MRI findings and postop pain relief (r = 0.53, p ≤ 0.01). History of previous distal radius fractures was negatively correlated with pain relief (r = -0.50, p ≤ 0.01). No correlation was found between postop strength and any of the variables. Presence of MRI signs of UIS is a predictor of good outcome in arthroscopic wafer resection.