A Multi‑Center, Open‑Label, Single‑Arm Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety and Tolerability of IGSC 20% in Subjects with Primary Immunodeficiency

Purpose The purpose of this phase 3 study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human), 20% Caprylate/Chromatography Purified (IGSC 20%) in patients with primary immunodeficiency (PI). Methods Immunoglobulin treatment-experienced subjects with PI received 52 weeks of IGSC 20% given weekly at the same dose as the subject’s previous IgG regimen (DAF 1:1); the minimum dose was 100 mg/kg/week. The primary endpoint was serious bacterial infections (SBIs [null vs alternative hypothesis: SBI rate per person per year ≥ 1 vs < 1]). IgG subclasses and specific pathogen antibody levels were also measured. Results Sixty-one subjects (19 children [≤ 12 years], 10 adolescents [> 12–16 years], and 32 adults) were enrolled. The rate of SBIs per person per year was 0.017. The 1-sided 99% upper confidence limit was 0.036 (< 1), and the null hypothesis was rejected. The rate of hospitalization due to infection per person per year was 0.017 (2-sided 95% confidence interval: 0.008–0.033) overall. The mean trough total IgG concentrations were comparable to the previous IgG replacement regimen. The average of the individual mean trough ratios (IGSC 20%:previous regimen) was 1.078 (range: 0.83–1.54). The average steady-state mean trough IgG concentrations were 947.64 and 891.37 mg/dL, respectively. Seven subjects had serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); none was drug-related. The rate of all TEAEs, including local infusion site reactions, during 3045 IGSC 20% infusions was 0.135. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate. Conclusions IGSC 20% demonstrated efficacy and good safety and tolerability in subjects with PI.

The Preferred Premedication Order to Prevent Infusion Reactions in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Pertuzumab Plus Trastuzumab and Docetaxel

Aims:Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel is a standard regimen for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer in the metastatic, adjuvant, and neoadjuvant settings. Infusion reaction represents one of the common side effects of anti-HER2 agents. There is no standard premedication to prevent infusion reactions, although antihistamines, acetaminophen, and/or corticosteroids are often used for this purpose. This study evaluated the ability of premedication to prevent induction reactions in patients receiving pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel. Methods: This retrospective, single-institute study assessed infusion reactions in 72 women with HER2-positive early breast cancer who received pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel between November 2018 and April 2021. Thirty-six patients received premedication consisting of oral acetaminophen prior to pertuzumab and trastuzumab administration and dexamethasone and D-chlorpheniramine maleate intravenously prior to docetaxel administration (previous regimen). Thirty-six patients received premedication consisting of acetaminophen, dexamethasone, and D-chlorpheniramine maleate sequentially prior to pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel administration (current regimen). Results: The rates of infusion reaction after the initial injection were 55.6 and 16.7% in the previous and current regiment groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Trastuzumab more frequently caused infusion reactions than pertuzumab and docetaxel. Chills, vomiting, and nausea were the major symptoms of infusion reactions. Conclusion: Premedication featuring the upfront use of dexamethasone and D-chlorpheniramine maleate prior to the administration of anti-HER2 targeted agents significantly prevented infusion reactions.

Microsatellite unstable esophageal adenocarcinoma masquerading as a conventional esophageal primary

Introduction/Objective Patients with microsatellite instability (MSI) are susceptible to developing epithelial malignancies in multiple organs and systems, especially along the gastrointestinal tract. It’s important to know that MSI-tumors may present with an intriguing non-classical, “non-MSI-appearing”, histomorphology that deviates from the well-known MSI or Lynch syndrome spectrum. Pathologists should thus be prepared for unusual histopathological presentations in order to detect MSI and related therapeutic and prognostic targets. Ultimately, a timely and accurate classification is a crucial step in guiding clinical course. Methods/Case Report An 80-year-old male presented to an outside facility due to worsening dysphagia. Imaging and endoscopy studies confirmed a near-obstructing distal esophageal mass. Subsequently, an esophagogastrostomy was performed, which removed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (pT3N1). The patient was managed with conventional chemotherapy after the surgery; however, due to progressive metastasis involving the liver, he was referred to our cancer center. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) Upon review of outside pathology materials, the tumor displayed irregularly arranged bizarre glands with eosinophilic cytoplasm and unusually large nuclei within the abundant fibrotic stroma. No intra-tumoral lymphocytes or “Crohn’s-like” pushing borders were identified. However, ancillary tests performed on acquired outside material showed loss of MLH1 and PMS2 with retained MSH2 and MSH6 in the tumor. Subsequent mutational analysis revealed additional MSI-related carcinogenic mutations. Accordingly, the previous regimen was switched to immunotherapy-based management. The patient remains disease-free 10-months later. Conclusion This unusual MSI esophageal adenocarcinoma exemplifies that such tumors may present with non- MSI/non-lynch histomorphology and that ancillary analyses should be carried out without reservation to evaluate microsatellite status. Thus, optimizing patient management and outcome.

Cluster analysis of clozapine consumer perspectives and comparison to consumers on other antipsychotics

Despite its unique efficacy, clozapine remains underutilized in the United States. Perceptions about clozapine and barriers to its use have been examined among prescribers, but insufficiently studied among consumers. We surveyed 211 antipsychotic consumers (86 on clozapine and 125 on other antipsychotics) on their medication-related perspectives in a public hospital system in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. In contrast to their previous regimen, 72% of clozapine consumers reported they were more satisfied with clozapine. When compared to consumers taking other antipsychotics, clozapine consumers reported more side effects, but did not differ on other measures of satisfaction or efficacy. We found Caucasians to be overrepresented among clozapine, as compared to other antipsychotic consumers. Side effects most strongly associated with poor safety ratings were sedation, limb jerking, and dizziness when standing. However, clozapine was only rated less safe by consumers who experienced more than one of these side effects. We used an unsupervised clustering approach to identify three major groups of clozapine consumers. Cluster A (19%) had the lowest safety ratings, aversion to blood work, and a high rate of side effects that associate with lower safety ratings. Cluster B (25%) experienced more hospitalizations and reported satisfaction with clozapine that correlated with efficacy ratings, irrespective of safety ratings. Cluster C (56%) experienced fewer hospitalizations, fewer previous drug trials, greater educational attainment, lower rates of smoking, and rated clozapine more highly. This work identifies common side effects that influence subjective safety of clozapine and suggests that attitudes toward clozapine depend on context-specific factors.

Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide in the Treatment of HIV-Infected Patients: Experience with the First 100 Patients from Qatar

Background. To describe our experience with the use of Elvitegravir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF) in the treatment of HIV-infected patients in Qatar including both naïve and treatment experienced. We also report the reasons for switching to EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF in treatment-experienced patients, response to treatment, and tolerability. Method. Review of the medical records of the first 100 HIV-infected patients treated with EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF. Results. Among the 100 HIV-infected patients who were treated with EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF, 64 were Qatari and the rest were from other nationalities. 80 patients were males and 20 were females. 29 were treatment naïve, and 71 were treatment experienced. Among treatment-experienced patients, the most common reasons for switch to EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF were safety concerns, followed by regimen simplification and adverse drug reaction of the previous regimen (40%, 14%, and 13%, respectively). Treatment response to EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF leading to undetectable viral load in naïve patients was 69%, and in treatment-experienced patients, it was 83% with an overall response among all patients of 79%. Excluding those who left the country and whose data were not available, the response rate will be 86%. Tolerability was excellent with mild side effects and no discontinuation due to side effects. Conclusion. Experience with the use of EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF in 100 patients with HIV infection in Qatar was favourable both in treatment naïve patients and in those who were treatment experienced with an excellent tolerability.

P674 Monitoring posologic change in adalimumab intensification dosing regimen from 40 mg every week to 80 mg every other week

Background The previous usual adalimumab (ADA) intensification regimen was 40 mg every week (ew)). Recently the original laboratory commercialised the 80 mg injection pen, with pharmacokinetic studies indicating an alternative intensification dose of 80 mg every other week (eow) similar to 40 mg ew, even though interchangeability has not been assessed in clinical practice. In the biosimilars era, this pen was sold to many Hospitals at the same price as the 40mg pen. For this fact and for patient comfort, we proposed our stable-intensificated-ADA IDB patients on a 40 mg ew regimen, to change the dose to 80 mg eow (clinical practice). Methods In this setting, we designed an observational study to monitor clinical, analytical and pharmacokinetic outcomes through this posologic change, for patients who signed the Informed Consent. Clinical (Harvey–Bradshaw index (HBI), partial Mayo score), analytic parameters and ADA trough levels were prospectively obtained at baseline, 4 and 8 months after posologic change. We describe the evolution of this cohort and calculate savings. Results 12 from 18 patients initially evaluated for new dose regimen were finally changed. All of them agreed to participate in the study. Eighty-three per cent were CD patients, 58% males, median age 51 years old (intecuartil range (IQR) 42–55). Median age at IBD diagnosis was 34 years (IQR 24–44). In 9 patients ADA was the first-line biologic. Median IBD duration before starting ADA was 6 years (IQR 5–8). Median time from ADA initiation to intensification was 31 months (IQR 14–55). The median time of ADA intensification was 37 months (IQR 30–66). Seventy per cent of patients were on immunosuppressors (IS) at the start of the study. Table 1 shows the results of clinical, analytical variables and ADA trough levels at baseline, 4 and 8 months. No differences were found. At 4 months, all patients maintained ADA 80 mg eow. Two patients referred mild worsening, (HBI from 3–4 to 5–6) without significant changes in CRP, calprotectin or ADA levels. They recovered after restoring the previous regimen (ADA 40mg ew). At 8 months, ADA was stopped in one patient in remission with undetectable ADA levels and positive ATI. Total savings in the first 8 months were 59022 €. Conclusion in IBD patients with stable response to ADA intensification regimen of 40 mg ew, changing to 80mg eow seems to maintain response and similar trough levels, although some patients may perceive mild symptoms. Economic savings are 50% per patient.

Outcomes by sex following treatment initiation with darunavir/cobicistat in a large Spanish cohort of the CODAR study (GeSIDA 9316)

Background Few women have been included in darunavir/cobicistat clinical development studies, and hardly any of them were antiretroviral experienced or treated with anything other than triple-based therapies. Objectives Our aim was to increase our knowledge about women living with HIV undergoing darunavir/cobicistat-based regimens. Methods A multicentre (21 hospitals), retrospective study including a centrally selected random sample of HIV-1 patients starting a darunavir/cobicistat-based regimen from June 2014 to March 2017 was planned. Baseline characteristics, 24 and 48 week viral load response (<50 copies/mL), CD4+ lymphocyte count increase, time to change darunavir/cobicistat and adverse event occurrence were all compared by sex. The study was approved by each of the 21 ethics committees, and patients signed informed consent. Results Out of 761 participants, 193 were women. Similar characteristics were found for both sexes, except that the women had a longer duration of HIV infection (P = 0.001), and were less frequently pre-treated with darunavir/cobicistat in their previous regimen (P = 0.02). The main reason for using a darunavir/cobicistat-based regimen was simplification, without differences by sex, while monotherapy seems to be more frequently prescribed in women than in men (P = 0.067). The main outcomes, HIV viral load response, CD4+ lymphocyte count increase at 24 or 48 weeks, occurrence of adverse events, main reasons for changing and time to the modify darunavir/cobicistat regimen, did not show differences between the sexes. Conclusions No sex disparities were found in the main study outcomes. These results support the use of a darunavir/cobicistat-based regimen in long-term pre-treated women. Clinical Trial.gov No. NCT03042390.

First-in-human first-in-class phase I trial of murlentamab, an anti-Mullerian-hormone receptor II (AMHRII) monoclonal antibody acting through tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) engagement, as single agent and in combination with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) in AMHRII-expressing advanced/metastatic gynecological cancer patients (pts).

2521 Background: Membranous expression of AMHRII is found in ~70% of gynecological tumors. Murlentamab (M) binds with high affinity both AMHRII (at cell membrane) and CD16 (on macrophage, via its low fucose Fc). M reprograms TAMs, restoring their antitumoral functions (phagocytosis) resulting in cytotoxic T cell reactivation. Methods: Pts with advanced/metastatic AMHRII-expressing ovarian, cervical or endometrial cancer with measurable disease and performance status ≤ 1 received M as single agent (SA) in 8 dose escalating and 2 expansion cohorts. Combination with CP was studied in 2 escalating cohorts. Safety, recommended dose determination, antitumor activity, pharmacodynamics (PD) effects (circulating immune cells and tumor microenvironment (TME) from paired biopsies) were assessed. Results: 68 heavily pretreated (median 4 prior lines) pts received M for 0.5 to 11 months (mo) (59 pts M SA and 9 pts M + CP). No dose limiting toxicity was reported. Most common toxicity was G1-2 asthenia (29 %). Eight pts (12%) had G ≥ 3 reversible toxicities (asthenia, nausea/vomiting, anorexia, arthralgia). No antidrug antibody was detected. One partial response (PR) was achieved with M SA in a granulosa pt. In CP combination, 4/9 pts (44%) responded to treatment (1 Complete Response and 3 PRs). Overall, 22/67 (33%) pts were progression-free at 4 mos. Among 17 pts treated ≥ 6 mos, 6/9 (67%) granulosa pts with M SA and 4/5 (80%) endometrium and cervix with CP combination had a longer PFS than under previous regimen. PD blood assessment of 25 pts treated with M SA showed an increase in classical monocytes, and T cells and neutrophils activation. Changes in TME under M will be presented. Conclusions: Murlentamab was very well tolerated, demonstrated immune PD effects and showed hints of antitumor activity. These results together with its innovative immunological mode of action support development of M in AMHRII-expressing cancers, in combination with chemotherapy or other immune oncology drugs. Clinical trial information: NCT02978755.

Effects of bevacizmab, eribulin and oxaliplatin in relapsed patients with platinum-resistant and refractory ovarian carcinomas: A preliminary case series with biomarker evaluation.

e17059 Background: Eribulin is a candidate for paclitaxel-refractory breast cancers, and Bevacizmab (B) is known to enhance efficacy of anti-cancer agents in ovarian cancers. A combination therapy using weekly administration of B with eribulin and oxaliplatin (EriOX) in relapsed patients with platinum-resistant and refactory ovarian carcinomas (PR-ROC) was evaluated retrospectively, and the association with response and serum biomarkers was investigated. Methods: Medical charts of the patients who met the criteria shown below were identified: (a) histologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer (b) diagnosed as platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (c) treated with weekly-B-EriOX consisting of B (2mg/kg), eribulin (1mg/m2), and oxaliplatin (30mg/m2), three weeks on and one week off, q4weeks (d) written informed consent. Biomarker analyses including serum VEGF, BNP, p53, and IL-6 were also conducted. Results: A total of 34 patients were treated with weekly-B-EriOX. Median age of the patients was 58.5 years (range: 35-76), and median number of previous regimen was 4(range: 2-9). Overall, two patients (6%) had a complete response (CR), 8 patients (24%) had a partial remission (PR) and 16 patients (47%) had a stable disease (SD). The response rate and clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) were 29% and 76%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4 months (range: 1-27+). Hematological adverse effects (AE) with grade 3/4 were observed in 4 patients (11%). Non-hematological AE greater than grade 2 was observed in one case: hypo albuminemia and edema, which were manageable and tolerable. The patients with elevation of serum mutated p53 protein and IL-6 had poorer prognosis. Conclusions: Weekly B and EriOX administration showed a remarkable response for patients with PR-ROC. Elevation of serum mutated p53 protein and IL-6 could be biomarkers for this regimen. These results warrant further prospective studies with additional biomarker analyses.

A phase I trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of weekly paclitaxel or cisplatin with electro-hyperthermia in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tubal or primary peritoneal carcinoma (KGOG 3030).

e17032 Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of weekly paclitaxel or cisplatin with electro-hyperthermia in patients with recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tubal or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Methods: This prospective trial employed ‘3+3 design’ with no dose escalation. Initially, patients were randomized to weekly paclitaxel (70mg/m2) or weekly cisplatin (40mg/m2) with electro-hyperthermia until three patients in each arm were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). A cycle was 4 weeks long and paclitaxel or cisplatin was administered at day 1, 8, 15. Targeting tumor beds, electro-hyperthermia was administered semi-weekly (8 time/cycle) for 1 hour per session. DLT was defined as any adverse event possibly or probably related to therapy, that required intensive care or was not recovered to grade 2 or lower within 3 weeks. If ≤1 patient in an arm experienced DLT, additional 3 patients were enrolled to that arm. Unevaluable patients (n = 4) were replaced. Finally, 12 patients (6 in each arm) were evaluated for toxicities, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Nine patients had high grade serous histology. Median number of previous regimen was 2 (range 1- 5) and median treatment-free interval from previous chemotherapy was 6 months (range 0 – 27). Nine patients were platinum resistant or refractory. No DLT was observed. Four grade 3 toxicities were observed (nausea 1, hematologic 3) in cisplatin arm. Overall response rate was 42% (5/12), median PFS was 4.3 months (range 1.7 – 11.8), and median OS was over 13.8 months (range 3.9 – > 38.5). Conclusions: Both weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin with electro-hyperthermia are safe enough to be tested in further studies. Chemotherapy with electro-hyperthermia was seems to be an effective treatment strategy for recurrent or persistent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tubal or primary peritoneal carcinomas. No significant differences in oncologic outcomes and toxicities were observed between paclitaxel and cisplatin arms. Clinical trial information: NCT02344095.