Sequence memory for prediction, inference and behaviour

In this paper, we propose a mechanism which the neocortex may use to store sequences of patterns. Storing and recalling sequences are necessary for making predictions, recognizing time-based patterns and generating behaviour. Since these tasks are major functions of the neocortex, the ability to store and recall time-based sequences is probably a key attribute of many, if not all, cortical areas. Previously, we have proposed that the neocortex can be modelled as a hierarchy of memory regions, each of which learns and recalls sequences. This paper proposes how each region of neocortex might learn the sequences necessary for this theory. The basis of the proposal is that all the cells in a cortical column share bottom-up receptive field properties, but individual cells in a column learn to represent unique incidences of the bottom-up receptive field property within different sequences. We discuss the proposal, the biological constraints that led to it and some results modelling it.

Monocular Cells Without Ocular Dominance Columns

In many regions of the mammalian cerebral cortex, cells that share a common receptive field property are grouped into columns. Despite intensive study, the function of the cortical column remains unknown. In the squirrel monkey, the expression of ocular dominance columns is variable, with columns present in some animals and not in others. By searching for differences between animals with and without columns, it should be possible to infer how columns contribute to visual processing. Single-cell recordings outside layer 4C were made in nine squirrel monkeys, followed by labeling of ocular dominance columns in layer 4C. In the squirrel monkey, compared with the macaque, cells outside layer 4C were more likely to respond to stimulation of either eye whether ocular dominance columns were present or not. In three animals lacking ocular dominance columns, single cells were recorded from layer 4C. Remarkably, 20% of cells in layer 4C were monocular despite the absence of columns. This observation means that ocular dominance columns are not necessary for monocular cells to occur in striate cortex. In macaques each row of cytochrome oxidase (CO) patches is aligned with an ocular dominance column and receives koniocellular input serving one eye only. In squirrel monkeys this was not true: CO patches and ocular dominance columns had no spatial correlation and the koniocellular input to CO patches was binocular. Thus even when ocular dominance columns occur in the squirrel monkey, they do not transform the functional architecture to resemble that of the macaque.