The Influence of Air Pollution on the Development of Allergic Inflammation in the Airways in Krakow’s Atopic and Non-Atopic Residents

Until now, the simultaneous influence of air pollution assessed by measuring the objective marker of exposition (1-hydroxypirene, 1-OHP) and atopy on the development of allergic airway diseases has not been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the pathomechanism of the allergic response to PM2.5 in atopic and non-atopic patients. We investigated the changes in peripheral blood basophil activity of patients after stimulation with the birch pollen allergen alone, the allergen combined with PM2.5 (BP), PM2.5 alone, a concentration of 1-OHP in urine, and a distance of residence from the main road in 30 persons. Activation by dust alone was positive for all concentrations in 83% of atopic and 75% of non-atopic assays. In the group of people with atopy, the simultaneous activation of BP gave a higher percentage of active basophils compared to the sum of activation with dust and birch pollen alone (B + P) for all concentrations. The difference between BP and B + P was 117.5 (p = 0.02) at a PM concentration of 100 μg. Such a relationship was not observed in the control group. The correlation coefficient between the distance of residence from major roads and urinary 1-OHP was 0.62. A Pearson correlation analysis of quantitative variables was performed, and positive correlation results were obtained in the atopy group between BP and 1-OH-P. Exposure to birch pollen and PM2.5 has a synergistic effect in sensitized individuals. The higher the exposure to pollutants, the higher the synergistic basophil response to the allergen and PM in atopic patients.

Baseline Tryptase Levels Correlate with Baseline Basophil Levels in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Chronic Phase

Aims: To study whether there is any correlation between baseline blood basophil count and serum tryptase levels in newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) patients. Settings and Design: 40 newly diagnosed CML-CP patients were enrolled from Medical Oncology Hematology OPD based on their baseline BCR-ABL status (done in department of Biochemistry). Methods and Materials: Serum tryptase level was measured using Sandwich ELISA and peripheral blood basophil count was estimated using automated cell counter & peripheral blood film examination. BCR-ABL quantification was done using real time PCR after conversion of RNA (extracted from whole blood) to cDNA. Statistical Analysis Used: SPSS Version 23. Results: Baseline peripheral blood basophil levels showed a significant correlation with baseline serum tryptase levels (p<0.01) and tryptase level also correlated with EUTOS score, which has basophil count as one of the parameters. This may signify that serum tryptase levels can be a surrogate marker of the basophil compartment in CML-CP. Conclusions: Based on findings of the present study and other studies available in literature, serum tryptase can be utilised as a surrogate marker of the basophil compartment in CML-CP.

Blood Eosinophilic and Basophilic Trends in Recurring and Non-Recurring Eosinophilic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Background Very few studies have compared blood eosinophil and basophil levels before and after surgery in patients with eosinophilic CRSwNP (eCRSwNP). No investigations seem to have repeatedly measured them pre- and postoperatively in eCRSwNP patients with recurring versus non-recurring disease to examine how their levels evolved. Objective Hence this study to analyze blood eosinophil and basophil levels in patients with eCRSwNP immediately before surgery and afterwards, at 4 months, 1 year, and then yearly up to 5 years. Methods Fifty-one eCRSwNP patients were enrolled, who all had preoperative laboratory data and the results of at least 4 of the 6 scheduled postoperative follow-up tests. Results Seventeen patients had recurrent disease. Blood eosinophil counts (p = 0.005) and percentages (p = 0.002) were both higher in these patients than in those whose eCRSwNPs did not recur after surgery. Blood basophil counts (p = 0.04) and percentages (p < 0.05) were also significantly higher in patients whose eCRSwNPs relapsed. The time by relapse interaction was not significant for either counts or percentages, though an effect of time was detected for basophil counts (p = 0.01). Conclusions In eCRSwNP, the statistical analysis of repeated quantitative laboratory data can shed light on the evolution of a patient’s systemic inflammatory picture in response to previous treatments, and above all to long-term therapies. Long-term monitoring of blood eosinophil and basophil levels could be of significant value when monoclonal antibodies that inhibit IL signaling will widely enter in clinical practice for eCRSwNP treatment to follow the effectiveness of therapy over time.

No Differences in Nasal Tissue Inflammatory Cells and Adhesion Molecules (iCAM-1 and vCAM-1) Based on the Comparison of EGPA With Eosinophilic Chronic Sinusitis With Polyposis

Background An example of aggressive eosinophilic polyposis can be found in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (iCAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (vCAM-1) play a part in mediating the recruitment and adhesion of leukocytes to the vessel wall, and their blood-to-tissue migration under inflammatory conditions. Objective This prospective study compared 3 groups—patients with a definite diagnosis EGPA, non-EGPA patients with phenotypic features suggestive of EGPA, and patients with non-eosinophilic nasal polyposis (controls)—in terms of nasal tissue histology, iCAM-1 and vCAM-1 expression, and blood inflammatory cells. Methods A total of 58 adults underwent sinus surgery (13 patients with EGPA, 23 suspected of having EGPA, and 22 controls). Results Mean tissue eosinophil counts were significantly higher in EGPA patients and suspected cases of EGPA than in controls. Although iCAM-1 and vCAM-1 were diffusely expressed in sinonasal tissues, they did not differently stain EGPA, eosinophilic-type and non-eosinophilic polyposis. Blood basophil and eosinophil levels were high in both the EGPA and the suspected EGPA groups. Intergroup differences were found for eosinophils but not for basophils. Conclusions We do not have yet blood or tissue markers able to differentiate the early phase of EGPA from chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Further investigations are mandatory considering EGPA patients at their initial diagnosis and before any treatment, in terms of nasal histology and blood inflammatory cells, to identify markers characterizing sinonasal mucosa inflammation and useful for an early diagnosis of EGPA.