Mutations in Ribosomal Protein RplA or Treatment with Ribosomal Acting Antibiotics Activates Production of Aminoglycoside Efflux Pump SmeYZ in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

ABSTRACT Aminoglycoside resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is multifactorial, but the most significant mechanism is overproduction of the SmeYZ efflux system. By studying laboratory-selected mutants and clinical isolates, we show here that damage to the 50S ribosomal protein L1 (RplA) activates SmeYZ production. We also show that gentamicin and minocycline, which target the ribosome, induce expression of smeYZ. These findings explain the role of SmeYZ in both intrinsic and mutationally acquired aminoglycoside resistance.

Spatial organization and dynamics of RNase E and ribosomes inCaulobacter crescentus

We report the dynamic spatial organization ofCaulobacter crescentusRNase E (RNA degradosome) and ribosomal protein L1 (ribosome) using 3D single-particle tracking and superresolution microscopy. RNase E formed clusters along the central axis of the cell, while weak clusters of ribosomal protein L1 were deployed throughout the cytoplasm. These results contrast with RNase E and ribosome distribution inEscherichia coli, where RNase E colocalizes with the cytoplasmic membrane and ribosomes accumulate in polar nucleoid-free zones. For both RNase E and ribosomes inCaulobacter, we observed a decrease in confinement and clustering upon transcription inhibition and subsequent depletion of nascent RNA, suggesting that RNA substrate availability for processing, degradation, and translation facilitates confinement and clustering. Importantly, RNase E cluster positions correlated with the subcellular location of chromosomal loci of two highly transcribed rRNA genes, suggesting that RNase E’s function in rRNA processing occurs at the site of rRNA synthesis. Thus, components of the RNA degradosome and ribosome assembly are spatiotemporally organized inCaulobacter, with chromosomal readout serving as the template for this organization.

Spatial organization and dynamics of RNase E and ribosomes in Caulobacter crescentus

We report the dynamic spatial organization of Caulobacter crescentus RNase E (RNA degradosome) and ribosomal protein L1 (ribosome) using 3D single particle tracking and super-resolution microscopy. RNase E formed clusters along the central axis of the cell, while weak clusters of ribosomal protein L1 were deployed throughout the cytoplasm. These results contrast with RNase E and ribosome distribution in E. coli, where RNase E co-localizes with the cytoplasmic membrane and ribosomes accumulate in polar nucleoid-free zones. For both RNase E and ribosomes in Caulobacter, we observed a decrease in confinement and clustering upon transcription inhibition and subsequent depletion of nascent RNA, suggesting that RNA substrate availability for processing, degradation, and translation facilitates confinement and clustering. Moreover, RNase E cluster positions correlate with the subcellular location of chromosomal loci of two highly transcribed ribosomal RNA genes, suggesting that RNase E’s function in ribosomal RNA processing occurs at the site of rRNA synthesis. Thus, components of the RNA degradosome and ribosome assembly are spatiotemporally organized in Caulobacter, with chromosomal readout serving as the template for this organization.

Protein–RNA affinity of ribosomal protein L1 mutants does not correlate with the number of intermolecular interactions

Ribosomal protein L1, as part of the L1 stalk of the 50S ribosomal subunit, is implicated in directing tRNA movement through the ribosome during translocation. High-resolution crystal structures of four mutants (T217V, T217A, M218L and G219V) of the ribosomal protein L1 fromThermus thermophilus(TthL1) in complex with a specific 80 nt fragment of 23S rRNA and the structures of two of these mutants (T217V and G219V) in the RNA-unbound form are reported in this work. All mutations are located in the highly conserved triad Thr-Met-Gly, which is responsible for about 17% of all protein–RNA hydrogen bonds and 50% of solvent-inaccessible intermolecular hydrogen bonds. In the mutated proteins without bound RNA the RNA-binding regions show substantial conformational changes. On the other hand, in the complexes with RNA the structures of the RNA-binding surfaces in all studied mutants are very similar to the structure of the wild-type protein in complex with RNA. This shows that formation of the RNA complexes restores the distorted surfaces of the mutant proteins to a conformation characteristic of the wild-type protein complex. Domain I of the mutated TthL1 and helix 77 of 23S rRNA form a rigid body identical to that found in the complex of wild-type TthL1 with RNA, suggesting that the observed relative orientation is conserved and is probably important for ribosome function. Analysis of the complex structures and the kinetic data show that the number of intermolecular contacts and hydrogen bonds in the RNA–protein contact area does not correlate with the affinity of the protein for RNA and cannot be used as a measure of affinity.