Identifiable Mutations in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in the Veteran Population: Molecular Testing Guidelines by NCCN 2020

Introduction/Objective In 2019 and 2020, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) advanced a recommendation that all patients with metastatic, recurrent, or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma should undergo tumor gene profiling (TGP). Prior to these recommendations, TGP in targeted patients have demonstrated a high frequency of KRAS (>90%), TP53 (60-70%), CDKN2A (>50%), SMAD4, TGF- βR1, and TGF- βR2 mutations or alterations. Even less frequent mutations such as the homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes impact treatment by predicting tumor response to platinum-based therapies. However, the literature is sparse for the frequency of these mutations in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing generalized testing as part of the standard of care per NCCN guidance, particularly for veterans. Methods/Case Report For a quality assurance study, a retrospective review was performed to identify patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma at a tertiary medical center serving veterans from January 2019 to February 2021 with TGP performed as part of their care. All of the TGP had been sent to Foundation Medicine (Cambridge MA), and the identifiable tumor mutations from the test reports were recorded to document the frequency of KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, TGF- βR1, TGF- βR2 and HRR mutations or alterations. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) There were a total of 11 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who had a tumor specimen for TGP during the study period. All 11 patient tumors had KRAS mutation. 10 out of 11 had a mutation or alteration in TP53. 8 of 11 patients had a CDKN2A mutation or alteration. 7 of 11 patients had a mutation or alteration of SMAD4 though none had TGF- βR1 or TGF- βR2. 2 of 11 patients had HRR mutations (1 with FANCA and 1 with ATM). Conclusion Tumor mutations on generalized gene profiling per NCCN guidelines continue to identify important mutations in pancreatic adenocarcinoma for veteran patients.

Use of FOLFIRINOX or Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Single Institution Observational Study

Patients with locally advanced (LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) do not present distant metastases but are not eligible for surgery upfront. Chemotherapy regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX (FFN) or nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (GemNab) in combination with loco-regional treatments are generally used in this setting. However, the best treatment choice is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed the information of 225 patients with stage II–III PDAC treated at our institution between October 2011 and December 2020. A total of 94 patients with LA PDAC who are non-eligible for surgery upfront received neoadjuvant FFN or GemNab. Of the 67 patients receiving FFN, 28 (41.8%) underwent surgery after neoadjuvant therapy. Of the 27 patients treated with GemNab, 6 (22.2%) became eligible for resection. The median overall survival (OS) was 85.1 weeks and 54.3 weeks in the FFN and GemNab groups, respectively (HR = 0.54, p = 0.0109). The median OS was 189.7 weeks and 76.4 weeks in the resected and unresected cohorts, respectively (HR = 0.25, p < 0.0001). Neutropenia (37.3%), anemia (6.0%), and diarrhea (6.0%) in the FFN group and neutropenia (22.2%) and thrombocytopenia (18.5%) in the GemNab groups were the most frequent grade 3–4 side effects. Higher rates of thrombocytosis (p < 0.0001) and peripheral edema (p < 0.0001) were observed in the GemNab group. Our results suggest that the use of FFN is associated with more favorable clinical outcomes than GemNab for patients with LA PDAC. Future randomized and controlled clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the role of these regimens and loco-regional treatments in this setting.

Distal Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Major vascular invasion represents one of the most frequent reasons to consider pancreatic adenocarcinomas unresectable, although in the last decades, demolitive surgeries such as distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) have become a therapeutical option. Methods: A meta-analysis of studies comparing DP-CAR and standard DP in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma was conducted. Moreover, a systematic review of studies analyzing oncological, postoperative and survival outcomes of DP-CAR was conducted. Results: Twenty-four articles were selected for the systematic review, whereas eleven were selected for the meta-analysis, for a total of 1077 patients. Survival outcomes between the two groups were similar in terms of 1 year overall survival (OS) (odds ratio (OR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 1.31, p = 0.24). Patients who received DP-CAR were more likely to have T4 tumors (OR 28.45, 95% CI 10.46 to 77.37, p < 0.00001) and positive margins (R+) (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.24 to 4.17, p = 0.008). Overall complications (OR, 1.72, 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.58, p = 0.008) were more frequent in the DP-CAR group, whereas rates of pancreatic fistula (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.65, p = 0.41) were similar. Conclusions: DP-CAR was not associated with higher mortality compared to standard DP; however, overall morbidity was higher. Celiac axis involvement should no longer be considered a strict contraindication to surgery in patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Considering the different baseline tumor characteristics, DP-CAR may need to be compared with palliative therapies instead of standard DP.

Prognostic Utility of Prechemoradiotherapy Albumin-to-Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio in Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma Patients

Background. We investigated the prognostic usefulness of prechemoradiotherapy (CRT) albumin-to-alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) in unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPAC) patients managed with definitive concurrent CRT (CCRT). Methods. A sum of 136 LAPAC patients who consecutively underwent definitive CCRT was retrospectively analyzed. The AAPR (serum albumin (g/dL)/serum alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)) was calculated by using the parameters obtained from the routine biochemistry tests on the first day of the CCRT. Ideal AAPR cutoff was sought by utilizing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary and secondary endpoints were the impact of the AAPR on the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) results, respectively. Results. At a median follow-up of 14.8 months (range: 3.2-85.7), the median PFS and OS times were 7.5 (95% confidence interval (CI): 6.0-9.0) and 14.9 months (95% CI: 11.9-17.9), respectively. The ideal common AAPR cutoff was identified at the rounded 0.46 (area under the curve: 72.3%; sensitivity: 71.2%; specificity: 70.3%) point that dichotomized the patients into two groups: low AAPR (L-AAPR; N = 71 ) and high AAPR (H-AAPR; N = 65 ) groups, respectively. Comparative survival analyses showed that the L-AAPR cohort had significantly shorter median PFS (6.8 (95% CI: 5.7-7.9) versus 11.3 (95% CI: 9.9-12.7) months; P = 0.005 ) and OS (12.8 (95% CI: 10.6-15.0) versus 19.2 (95% CI: 16.9-21.5) months; P = 0.001 ) durations than their H-AAPR counterparts, separately. Albeit the N1-2 ( P = 0.004 ) and CA 19 ‐ 9 > 90 U / mL ( P = 0.008 ) were also found to be associated with inferior outcomes, yet the results of the multivariate analyses ascertained the L-AAPR as an independent indicator of diminished PFS ( P = 0.003 ) and OS ( P = 0.002 ) results. Conclusion. The present results proposed that the pretreatment AAPR < 0.46 was a novel independent indicator of adverse PFS and OS in unresectable LAPAC patients undergoing definitive CCRT.