family forests
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 466-473
Author(s):  
Robert Zupko

Abstract Abstract In heavily forested rural areas, tax-incentivization programs are commonly employed to encourage timber production and harvesting activities. Because of growing interest in developing woody-biomass-based biofuels in the Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA, we analyzed property records to determine who the regional actors are along with what role tax-incentivization programs may play. We found that a minority of entities collectively control 77 percent of the land in the region; however, family forest owners collectively own 23 percent of the land. Although tax-incentive programs are commonly used by commercial forests, the requirements of the primary program in Michigan program appear to preclude most family forests in the region. Accordingly, this study suggests that a greater understanding of reluctance of family forests to enroll in secondary programs is needed, or a lowering of forestland requirements to permit more family forests to enroll. Study Implications In heavily forested rural areas, the development of local forest resources has been suggested as a means of developing the local economy. One means of using the forest resources is through the development of woody-biomass-based biofuel or bioenergy programs. As these programs are dependent upon harvesting to supply the relevant feedstocks, tax-incentivization programs, such as Michigan’s Commercial Forest Land (CFL), may be used to encourage commercial timber production and overcome resistance to harvesting by nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) owners. These findings suggest such programs are likely to be well to fully subscribed by commercial forests. However, the implementation of these programs (ex., minimum of 40 ac. of forestland) may preclude a significant number of family forests from being able to enroll, which may be a contributing factor to low subscription rates. As a result, policymakers wishing to encourage enrollment by family forests in tax-incentivization programs should consider the practical realities of regional family ownership (i.e., average forestland acreage) in developing the programs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 188 ◽  
pp. 143-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Tortini ◽  
A.L. Mayer ◽  
T. Hermosilla ◽  
N.C. Coops ◽  
M.A. Wulder

Author(s):  
Mikko Kurttila ◽  
Brett J. Butler ◽  
Teppo Hujala ◽  
Jari Miina ◽  
Henri Vanhanen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 577-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marla Markowski-Lindsay ◽  
Brett J. Butler ◽  
David B. Kittredge
Keyword(s):  
The Usa ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco X. Aguilar ◽  
Marissa “Jo” Daniel ◽  
Zhen Cai

Understanding willingness to harvest (WTH) is essential to assessing the social availability of woody biomass from private land. Currently, the only economically feasible way to harvest woody biomass is in conjunction with sawlogs. We examined WTH sawlogs and woody biomass from owners of family forests using data from a survey of Missouri forest owners. While their WTH increased with revenue expected from woody biomass, revenue expected from sawlogs was a stronger influence. Incentive payments for woody biomass thus are unlikely to increase its supply, and the social availability of woody biomass will remain limited unless sawlog prices rise significantly.


2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal F. Maker ◽  
René H. Germain ◽  
Nathaniel M. Anderson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document