intensive behavioral treatment
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

23
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

13
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pevitr S. Bansal ◽  
Daniel A. Waschbusch ◽  
Sarah M. Haas ◽  
Dara E. Babinski ◽  
Sara King ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jason W. Krompinger ◽  
Sadie Cole Monaghan ◽  
Christina M. Gironda ◽  
Lauryn E. Garner ◽  
Jesse M. Crosby ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 304-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith E. Williams ◽  
Douglas G. Field ◽  
Katherine Riegel ◽  
Candace Paul

2009 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Secades-Villa ◽  
Fernando Alonso-Pérez ◽  
Olaya García-Rodríguez ◽  
José Ramón Fernández-Hermida

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three smoking cessation programs of varying intensity applied in a primary care setting. Participants were 89 individuals randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: brief counseling plus information pamphlet, self-help program with telephone follow-up, and intensive behavioral treatment. At the 12-mo. follow-up, intensive behavioral treatment (42.8% abstinence) was more effective than the self-help program (27.5%), which was in turn more effective than counseling (12.9%). Continued abstinence was also higher in the intensive treatment group (37.9%) than in the self-help (17.2%) and the counseling groups (9.7%), although these differences only reached statistical significance in the first and third of these groups. Treatment adherence was higher in the intensive behavioral group (82.8% of participants atended all the sessions) than in the self-help group (61.8% completed the program). The results appear to confirm a dose-response effect in the treatment of smokers and indicate satisfactory acceptability of intensive behavioral programs applied in primary care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document