1569 Paediatric Upper Limb Fracture Manipulation in A Children’s Emergency Department: Practice Changes During The COVID-19 Pandemic

Background Trauma theatre time is valuable and previous studies reported cost of £24.77/minute. BSUH Children’s emergency department (CED) guidelines were implemented in December 2016, allowing reduction of forearm and distal radius (DR) fractures in CED using 70% nitrous (N2O) sedation. Due to COVID-19 pandemic and the risks associated with aerosol generating procedures as well as staffing levels, CED shifted to using 50%N2O with or without intranasal fentanyl. Method Relevant fractures presenting to CED from Feb-Dec 2020 were identified and compared to previous years. Demographics, treatment modality, timings, and outcomes were reviewed for 275 patients. Results In 2017-2018, 56% were manipulated in CED under 70%N2O (compared to only 3% in 2016). The main barrier identified was shortage of doctors trained in sedation to supervise use of 70%N20. In 2020, 101 patients were suitable for manipulation in CED. 64 had DR fractures, 37 midshaft fractures, 65 were male. Mean age: 10 years. 92 patients (91%) were manipulated in CED/fracture clinic. One was under 70%N2O; the rest used 50%N2O with or without intranasal fentanyl. 8 (9%) had manipulation under GA. Of those manipulated in CED, 3 were re-manipulated in clinic for cast problems. A typical MUA takes 30minutes indicating a saving of £743 per case; therefore, £68,356 over the study period. Conclusions Paediatric upper limb fracture manipulation in CED under N2O is effective and provides significant cost savings. Due to changes related to COVID-19 pandemic, considerably more patients in 2020 were safely treated in CED/clinic. Using 50%N2O improves uptake due to lower staffing requirements.

A Case of Teriparatide Use in Nonunion Atypical Ulnar Fracture

Background: Atypical upper limb fracture is a rare complication of bisphosphonate use. The management of nonunion fractures is challenging, especially in patients who are not surgical candidates. Teriparatide, a novel anabolic drug for osteoporosis has been increasingly used off-label for treatment of nonunion fractures and bisphosphonate related atypical fractures of the lower extremity. The proposed mechanism of healing is by enhancement of callus formation and mechanical strength. Clinical Case: A 72 year-old woman with a history of bilateral lower extremity paralysis and bilateral upper extremity paresis, who mobilized short distances with Canadian crutches, had been treated for 15 years with alendronate, for osteopenia associated with multiple risk factors for osteoporosis. 11 months before referral, and a month after alendronate was discontinued, she sustained a muscle-spasm induced fracture of the mid-shaft of the right ulna. She was treated nonoperatively due to chronic osteomyelitis with recurrent bacteremia from a prior non-healing left ulnar fracture (with internal fixation). Bone density of the right forearm had been normal. Since the right ulna break was transverse with minimal comminution, located in the diaphysis, occurred after trivial force and exhibited delayed healing, it was thought to be an atypical fracture secondary to bisphosphonates. She was initiated on cyclical teriparatide injection 20 mcg subcutaneously daily, with 2 months on and 2 weeks off. In one year, patient responded with dramatic radiographic improvement by forming a large callus with almost complete healing of the fracture. Conclusion: Mid-forearm atypical fracture from long-term bisphosphonate use is rare and is at risk for nonunion. The management of atypical upper limb nonunion fracture in nonoperative patients is not well established. Case reports exist of patients with atypical upper limb fracture who are either treated conservatively, or surgically with fixation/bone grafting +/- teriparatide. Our case showed that teriparatide, when used cyclically, exerted positive osteogenic effect and improved healing of the nonunion of an atypical fracture of forearm in a patient who continued weight bearing activity on her only functional limb.

Factors associated with persistent opioid use after an upper extremity fracture

Aims The increase in prescription opioid misuse and dependence is now a public health crisis in the UK. It is recognized as a whole-person problem that involves both the medical and the psychosocial needs of patients. Analyzing aspects of pathophysiology, emotional health, and social wellbeing associated with persistent opioid use after injury may inform safe and effective alleviation of pain while minimizing risk of misuse or dependence. Our objectives were to investigate patient factors associated with opioid use two to four weeks and six to nine months after an upper limb fracture. Methods A total of 734 patients recovering from an isolated upper limb fracture were recruited in this study. Opioid prescription was documented retrospectively for the period preceding the injury, and prospectively at the two- to four-week post-injury visit and six- to nine-month post-injury visit. Bivariate and multivariate analysis sought factors associated with opioid prescription from demographics, injury-specific data, Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS), Depression computer adaptive test (CAT), PROMIS Anxiety CAT, PROMIS Instrumental Support CAT, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), and measures that investigate levels of social support. Results A new prescription of opioids two to four weeks after injury was independently associated with less social support (odds ratio (OR) 0.26, p < 0.001), less instrumental support (OR 0.91, p < 0.001), and greater symptoms of anxiety (OR 1.1, p < 0.001). A new prescription of opioids six to nine months after injury was independently associated with less instrumental support (OR 0.9, p < 0.001) and greater symptoms of anxiety (OR 1.1, p < 0.001). Conclusion This study demonstrates that potentially modifiable psychosocial factors are associated with increased acute and chronic opioid prescriptions following upper limb fracture. Surgeons prescribing opioids for upper limb fractures should be made aware of the screening and management of emotional and social health. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(2):119–124.

Effect of erector spinae plane block for rib fractures on postoperative analgesia for elbow surgery: A case report

The erector spinae plane block is an emerging technique for analgesia. It has shown to provide reliable analgesia in abdominal and thoracic surgery. Erector spinae plane block may be efficacious for analgesia of pain in the upper limb. The advantage of this modality would be in a patient with polytrauma with rib fractures and upper limb fracture/injury as it assists in the physiotherapy of the chest and upper limb.

Perioperative management of distal radius fractures

Fractures of the distal radius are the most common upper limb fracture and account for over a sixth of all fractures seen in emergency departments. Although most of these fractures are managed non-operatively, a significant number of complex injuries undergo operative management. This educational review of up to date guidelines discusses the perioperative management of distal radius fractures and provides readers with continuing professional development activities.

Southampton Arm Fracture Frailty and Sarcopenia Study (SAFFSS): a study protocol for the feasibility of assessing frailty and sarcopenia among older patients with an upper limb fracture

IntroductionFalls are a major health problem for older people; 35% of people aged 65+ years fall every year, leading to fractures in 10%–15%. Upper limb fractures are often the first sign of osteoporosis and routine screening for osteoporosis is recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence to prevent subsequent hip fractures. However, both frailty and sarcopenia (muscle weakness) are associated with increased risk of falling and fracture but are not routinely identified in this group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of assessing and managing frailty and sarcopenia among people aged 65+ years with an upper limb fracture.Methods and analysisThis study will be conducted in three fracture clinics in one acute trust in England. 100 people aged 65+ years with an upper arm fracture will be recruited and assessed using six validated frailty measures and two sarcopenia tools. The prevalence of the two conditions and the best tools to use will be determined. Those with either condition will be referred to geriatric clinical teams for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). We will document the proportion who are referred for CGA and those who receive CGA. Other outcome measures including falls, fractures and healthcare resource use over 6 months will be collected. In-depth interviews with a purposive sample of patients who undergo the frailty and sarcopenia assessments and healthcare professionals in fracture clinics and geriatric services will be carried out to their acceptability of assessing frailty and sarcopenia in a busy environment.Ethics and disseminationThe study was given the relevant ethical approvals from NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC No: 18/NE/0377), the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, and the University of Southampton, Faculty of Medicine Ethics Committee and Research Governance Office. Findings will be published in scientific journals and presented to local, national and international conferences.Trial registration numberISRCTN13848445

UPPER LIMB FRACTURE

Introduction: Upper limb fractures are one of the common fractures presentingin Accident and Emergency departments. Some of the upper limb fractures need openreduction and internal fixation. Use of suction drains after upper limb surgery is still debatableissue. Some surgeons routinely use, others never use and few occasionally use. Objectives:Aim of this study was to compare the results of upper limb fracture surgery by using or not usingthe suction drains. Design: Quasi Experimental Design. Settings: Orthopedic department AzizBhatti Shaheed Teaching Hospital Gujrart. Period: From December 2015 to November 2016.Method & Material: Total 120 patients were selected as per selection criteria. In 60 patients weused suction drain post-operatively & remaining 60 patients without Suction drain. Results:In our study we selected 120 patients .Patients divided in two groups. In group A 60 patientsincluded in the study. We did not use suction drain in these patients. In group B we also selected60 patients of upper limb fractures. We used suction drain in these patients. We compared theresults of both groups on the basis of superficial wound infection and pain. In group A, sixpatients developed superficial wound infection while four patients developed superficial woundinfection in group. There was no difference in severity of pain in both groups. Conclusion:We concluded from our study that there is no added advantage of suction drain in upper limbfracture surgery.