Cardioplegia Application with A Hand-Squeezed Cardioplegia Bag. Is It Safe?

Objectives: Cardioplegia solutions have a role not only in arresting the heart but also in protecting the myocardium from ischemia. While antegrade cardioplegia is given by the heart-lung machine in many centers, it is given by a hand-squeezed bag in very few centers. The pressure of cardioplegia given antegrade from the heart-lung machine is certain (60-90 mmHg). The pressure applied in the cardioplegia method, which is given antegrade with a hand-squeezed bag, is uncertain and variable. We compared the antegrade cardioplegia method applied with a hand-squeezed bag with the antegrade cardioplegia method applied with a roller pump from the heart-lung machine in terms of protecting the myocardium from ischemia. Methods: Seventy-six patients who did not have an acute myocardial infarction, had normal preoperative cardiac marker (troponin and CK-MB) values, did not undergo redo open heart surgery, had an ejection fraction of 50% and above, and underwent elective two or three-vessel isolated coronary artery bypass surgery were evaluated. While tepid (30-32°C) blood cardioplegia was administered antegrade to 33 patients (Group A) with a hand-squeezed bag, the other 34 patients (Group B) received tepid (30-32°C) antegrade blood cardioplegia from the heart-lung machine. The perioperative and postoperative data of the patients were recorded and compared. To evaluate myocardial damage, postoperative cardiac markers and echocardiography data were evaluated and compared at the fourth hour after the cross-clamp was removed in both groups. Results: When evaluated in terms of preoperative demographic data, preoperative mean EF values and intraoperative data, there was no statistical difference between both groups. When we evaluated in terms of myocardial protection, the mean TnT level was 4.31 ± 1.95 at the 4th hour in Group A and 3.91 ± 1.69 in Group B. Mean 4th hour CK-MB level was 40.84 ± 9.07 in Group A and 38.56 ± 8.07 in Group B. Mean change in EF (%) was -4.09 ± 4.41 in Group A and 3.53 ± 4.53 in Group B. In line with the current data when we evaluated in terms of myocardial protection, we found that there is no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.373; P = 0.158; P = 0.523). There was no statistical difference between both groups, in terms of postoperative arrhythmias. None of the patients died, and no patients required an intra-aortic balloon pump. Results: As a result of our study, cardioplegia administration with a certain constant pressure from the roller pump and hand-squeezed bag with uncertain pressure does not make a difference, in terms of myocardial protection. We think that the content and amount of cardioplegia and the preferred time for repeated cardioplegia applications are more important for the protection of the myocardium. Methods: 76 patients who did not have an acute myocardial infarction, had normal preoperative cardiac marker (troponin and CK-MB) values, did not undergo redo open heart surgery, had an ejection fraction of 50% and above, and underwent elective two or three-vessel isolated coronary artery bypass surgery were evaluated. While tepid(30-32 ° C) blood cardioplegia was administered antegrade to 33 patients(Group A) with a hand-squeezed bag, the other 34 patients(Group B) received tepid(30-32 °C) antegrade blood cardioplegia from the heart-lung machine. The perioperative and postoperative data of the patients were recorded and compared. To evaluate myocardial damage, postoperative cardiac markers and echocardiography data were evaluated and compared at the fourth hour after the cross-clamp was removed in both groups. Results: When evaluated in terms of preoperative demographic data, preoperative mean EF values and intraoperative data there was no statistical difference between both groups. When we evaluated in terms of myocardial protection, the mean TnT level was 4.31 ± 1.95 at the 4th hour in group A and 3.91 ± 1.69 in group B. Mean 4th hour CK-MB level was 40.84 ± 9.07 in group A and 38.56 ± 8.07 in group B. Mean change in EF (%) was -4.09 ± 4.41 in group A and 3.53 ± 4.53 in group B. In line with the current data when we evaluated in terms of myocardial protection; we found that there is no statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.373; p = 0.158; p = 0.523). There was no statistical difference between both groups in terms of postoperative arrhythmia's. None of the patients died and none of the patients required an intra-aortic balloon pump.

In Through the Out Door: Tips and Tricks for Giving Retrograde Cardioplegia

Antegrade cardioplegia delivery is the most commonly used delivery route. It is given into the aortic root or directly into the coronary ostia. However, there are many reasons to consider using the retrograde delivery of cardioplegia. This treatise will review the background and techniques for delivering retrograde cardioplegia.

Antegrade Cardioplegia Decannulation Using the Cor-Knot System in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery

A right mini-thoracotomy approach may be used for mitral valve repair without compromising clinical outcomes. Compared with conventional sternotomy, there is an increased distance to the cardiac structures from the mini-thoracotomy incision, which makes certain technical acts more demanding. One particular challenge is hemostasis at the antegrade cardioplegia cannula site. We propose a novel technique to remove an antegrade cardioplegia cannula using the COR-KNOT system. This technique negates the need for tying with a knot pusher and reduces the risk of aortic injury and troublesome bleeding.

Axillary Artery Access for Combined Endoaortic Balloon Occlusion and Perfusion during Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery

We aimed to develop a method that provides an alternative cannulation site in robotic mitral valve surgery that allows simultaneous endo-occlusion and antegrade perfusion. A 71-year-old man with severe mitral regurgitation and history of coronary artery bypass grafting underwent totally endoscopic robotic mitral valve repair. A 23-mm endoreturn cannula was placed through a 10-mm graft that was sewn to the left axillary artery. An endoballoon was passed through the Dacron/cannula complex and into the ascending aorta. This complex was used for simultaneous antegrade perfusion, endoballoon occlusion, and antegrade cardioplegia. Completion transesophageal echocardiography showed no evidence of mitral regurgitation. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course and was doing well at his 2-month follow-up appointment. The left axillary artery is a viable option for simultaneous endoballoon occlusion, antegrade perfusion, and antegrade cardioplegia in robotic mitral valve surgery. This has the potential benefit of providing antegrade perfusion, which some studies have shown to be associated with a decreased risk of complications when compared with retrograde perfusion specifically inpatients with severe peripheral vascular disease.