laschamp excursion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 550 ◽  
pp. 116547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quentin Simon ◽  
Nicolas Thouveny ◽  
Didier L. Bourlès ◽  
Jean-Pierre Valet ◽  
Franck Bassinot

Geology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioan Lascu ◽  
Joshua M. Feinberg ◽  
Jeffrey A. Dorale ◽  
Hai Cheng ◽  
R. Lawrence Edwards

Radiocarbon ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Cauquoin ◽  
Grant Raisbeck ◽  
Jean Jouzel ◽  
Didier Paillard

The Laschamp excursion is a period of reduced geomagnetic field intensity occurring 40.7 ± 1.0 kyr ago. As a consequence, cosmogenic isotope production increased dramatically and its sensitivity to solar activity was enhanced during this period. The latter occurs because a larger fraction of the lower-energy interstellar galactic cosmic-ray particles, normally excluded by the geomagnetic field, is able to reach Earth's atmosphere. This produces a cosmogenic isotope production signal with a significant structure. As high-resolution 10Be profiles from both Antarctica (EDC) and Greenland (NGRIP-GRIP) during this crucial period are now available, one can use them as input into a box carbon cycle model in order to predict atmospheric 14C variations due to the Laschamp excursion. For this purpose, 10Be data are converted into 14C, using production calculations for the 10Be-14C conversion, after correction for the estimated difference of sensitivity between polar and global 10Be deposition. Several scenarios of carbon cycle state are simulated, from preindustrial to glacial conditions. Applying two recent cosmogenic isotope production calculations for the 10Be to 14C conversion, we found that the resulting atmospheric Δ14C variations are very sensitive to which of these two are employed. For example, Δ14C amplitude under glacial conditions varies from 260‰ (EDC) and 320‰ (Greenland) to 430‰ (EDC) and 510‰ (Greenland) depending on the formulation used for 10Be-14C conversion.


2012 ◽  
Vol 200-201 ◽  
pp. 10-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Vérard ◽  
Roman Leonhardt ◽  
Michael Winklhofer ◽  
Karl Fabian

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis G. Collins ◽  
Mark W. Hounslow ◽  
Claire S. Allen ◽  
Dominic A. Hodgson ◽  
Jennifer Pike ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 286 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 80-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad S. Singer ◽  
Hervé Guillou ◽  
Brian R. Jicha ◽  
Carlo Laj ◽  
Catherine Kissel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ice Core ◽  

2009 ◽  
Vol 278 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 87-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
R LEONHARDT ◽  
K FABIAN ◽  
M WINKLHOFER ◽  
A FERK ◽  
C LAJ ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 245 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 19-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
G LEDUC ◽  
N THOUVENY ◽  
D BOURLES ◽  
C BLANCHET ◽  
J CARCAILLET
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 197 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 151-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.V. Kent ◽  
S.R. Hemming ◽  
B.D. Turrin
Keyword(s):  

Radiocarbon ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antje H L Voelker ◽  
Pieter M Grootes ◽  
Marie-Josee Nadeau ◽  
Michael Sarnthein

By correlating the climate records and radiocarbon ages of the planktonic foraminifera N. pachyderma(s) of deep-sea core PS2644 from the Iceland Sea with the annual-layer chronology of the GISP2 ice core, we obtained 80 marine 14C calibration points for the interval 11.4-53.3 ka cal BP. Between 27 and 54 ka cal BP the continuous record of 14C/cal age differences reveals three intervals of highly increased 14C concentrations coincident with low values of paleomagnetic field intensity, two of which are attributed to the geomagnetic Mono Lake and Laschamp excursions (33.5-34.5 ka cal BP with maximum 550 marine δ14C, and 40.3-41.7 ka cal BP with maximum 1215 marine δ14C, respectively). A third maximum (marine δ14C: 755) is observed around 38 ka cal BP and attributed to the geomagnetic intensity minimum following the Laschamp excursion. During all three events the A14C values increase rapidly with maximum values occurring at the end of the respective geomagnetic intensity minimum. During the Mono Lake Event, however, our A14C values seem to underestimate the atmospheric level, if compared to the 36Cl flux measured in the GRIP ice core (Wagner et al. 2000) and other records. As this excursion coincides with a meltwater event in core PS2644, the underestimation is probably caused by an increased planktonic reservoir age. The same effect also occurs from 38.5 to 40 ka cal BP when the meltwater lid of Heinrich Event 4 affected the planktonic record.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document