A retrospective study of local hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy combined with regorafenib in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with predominant liver metastases.

e15563 Background: The hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as a second/third-line therapy has resulted in promising clinical outcomes for unresectable liver metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). HAIC combined with regorafenib has not been reported for advanced CRC patients with predominant liver metastases. This retrospective study explored the benefits and tolerability in advanced hepatic metastatic CRC patients who received HAIC combined with regorafenib after failure of standard systemic chemotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study collected and analyzed 47 patients treated with HAIC in combination with regorafenib after standard systemic oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan in combination with Bevacizumab or Cetuximab between Jan 2017 and Jun 2020 at the Beijing cancer hospitals in China. Regorafenib was taken for 3 weeks every 4-week cycles and mostly taken 5-7 days before or after the first HAIC. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were observed. Results: Among these 47 patients, 32(68%) were males. The median age was 61 (range: 29-75) . The median follow-up was 22.2 months (range:3.7-50.7 months). Before receiving HAIC in combination with regorafenib, 34 (72.3%) patients had previously received ≥ 2 prior lines of systemic therapy and 37 (78.7%) patients had previously received targeted biological treatment (anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR, or both).These patients underwent HAIC for a median of 4 sessions (range2--8,). The starting doses of regorafenib were 40 mg/d (n = 1, 2.13%), 80 mg/d (n = 11, 23.43%), 120 mg/d (n = 2, 4.26%), and 160 mg/d (n = 23, 48.94%). The median OS was 22.2 months. The median PFS was 10.8 (95% CI: 9.0-13.7) months. The ORR was 51.3% and DCR was 100% among 39 patients whose tumor responses were evaluated in the liver. The ORR was 13.8% and DCR was 48.3% among 29 patients whose tumor responses were evaluated outside the liver. Toxicity profile of regorafenib was as expected, with common AE were hand-foot skin reaction (12.77%), fatigue (6.38%), vomiting (6.38%), and decreased appetite (6.38%). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (4.26%), hypertension (2.13%), diarrhea (2.13%), and stomachache (2.13%). Only 2 patients stopped regorafenib due to AEs. Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrated that regorafenib combined with HAIC was beneficial and tolerable in advanced CRC patients with liver metastases whose disease had progressed after standard systemic therapy. It also indicated a new promising treatment strategy for late stage CRC. Additional prospective and large-scale studies are required for further confirmation. Key words: hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy; regorafenib; colorectal cancer

A phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OQL011 on VEGFR inhibitor-associated hand-foot-skin reaction in cancer patients.

TPS12132 Background: Hand-Foot Skin Reaction (HFSR) is frequently associated with the use of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFRi) such as cabozantinib, regorafenib, sunitinib, and lenvatinib. HFSR affects the skin on the palms and soles and is manifested as edema, erythema, hyperkeratosis, and bullae, leading to a decrease in quality of life and interruptions in dosing. The incidence of HFSR differs among VEGFRi, ranging from 5-60% (all grades) and 1-18% (grade 3). To date, there is no FDA approved treatment for HFSR, and marginal benefit has been shown with topical urea or steroids. Although not fully elucidated, the pathogenesis of HFSR has been associated with impaired vascular repair mechanisms, caused by inhibition of VEGF signaling pathways. We hypothesize that topical stimulation of VEGFR through OQL011 will decrease the severity of HFSR symptoms via local upregulation of the VEGF/VEGFR related signaling pathways. Methods: NCT04088318 is a phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OQL011 compared to vehicle control in the treatment of moderate to severe HFSR in patients on VEGFRi therapy. Eligible patients will have ≥ grade 2 palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). The study is expected to enroll 112 patients in two parts. In the first part, 42 patients will apply 0.2% OQL011 topical ointment or vehicle control (2:1 randomization) TID for six weeks. In Part 2, 70 subjects will be randomized into two additional dose levels or vehicle control in a 2:2:1 ratio. The two dose levels selected will be based on the efficacy and safety results of Part 1. The primary efficacy endpoint is improvement of NCI CTCAE v5.0 PPE to grade ≤1 by week 3. Photographs of the affected areas will be taken at Day 0, 7, 14, 21 and 42 timepoints. Superiority test will be performed to compare treatment groups, and the exposure-response relationship will be explored. In addition, an investigator global assessment (IGA) for HFSR will be used in this trial to specifically assess skin recovery and is proposed to be a new evaluation tool. The validity of IGA criteria will be evaluated by assessing the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. The correlation between IGA, NCI CTCAE v5.0 for PPE, and patient reported outcomes including Visual Analog Scale of Pain, Hand-foot Quality of Life questionnaire will also be evaluated. This study began enrolling patients in December 2019 and is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04088318.

Preliminary results of anlotinib and niraparib dual therapy evaluation in platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer.

e17532 Background: Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer have a poor prognosis. Effective treatment options for these patients are limited. Combination of PARP inhibitors and antiangiogenic therapy is reported as an effective antitumor strategy. In this study (ANNIE), we evaluate the activity of niraparib combined with anlotinib in patients with platinum resistant recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Methods: The ANNIE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04376073) was a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study that evaluated the safety and activity of niraparib combined with anlotinib in patients (≥18 & ≤70 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1) with recurrent ovarian epithelial, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer cancer whose disease recurred in less than 6 months after the last administered platinum therapy, and with measurable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Patients received oral niraparib 300mg/200mg once daily continuously and anlotinib 12mg (The initial dose was reduced to 10mg on November 1, 2020) on day 1-14 of each 21-day cycle thereafter until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary objective was to assess objective response rate (ORR; complete plus partial responses) according to RECIST version 1.1. 40 cases are planned to be enrolled. Results: Between May 22, 2020 and February 6, 2021, we enrolled 33 patients (median age, 56 years [range, 37-69 years]). Patients had received a median of six (range, 2-9) previous lines of therapy. The cut-off date of analysis was February 4, 2021, the median follow-up was 4.1 months (range, 0.1–8.1). At data cutoff, all but seven (2 voluntarily withdrew, 5 with progressive disease) of the patients were still on treatment. Twenty-five patients underwent imaging evaluation. The confirmed best overall response assessment showed 12 with partial responses, 12 with stable disease, yielding the ORR of 48.0% (95% CI, 27.0%̃69.0%). The median duration of response and the median PFS were not reached. Drug-related grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse events were occurred in 39.4% patients, including hand-foot skin reaction (3 pts), thrombocytopenia (2 pts), hypertriglyceridemia (2 pts), neutropenia (2 pts), anemia (1 pts) and hypertension (1 pts). The most common treatment emergent adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (36.4%), hypertension (36.4%), and thrombocytopenia (33.3%). No treatment-related death was recorded. Enrollment was ongoing so far. Conclusions: Niraparib in combination with anlotinib showed promising antitumor activity and tolerable toxicity in patients with platinum resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. The conclusion can be clarified after the research is completed. Clinical trial information: NCT04376073.

Apatinib-Induced Hand–Foot Skin Reaction in Chinese Patients With Liver Cancer

Apatinib, an anti-tumor drug selectively targeting VEGFR2 (Vascular Endothelia Growth Factor Recpetor-2), has been proven effective in Chinese patients with liver cancer. Generally, treatment with apatinib achieves 16.1% of the overall objective remission rate (ORR) and 55.83% of the disease control rate (DCR) in Chinese patients with liver cancer. However, the prevalence of apatinib-induced hand–foot skin reaction (AI-HFSR) is noticeably high. The incidence of AI-HFSR is about 50.5%, of which Grades 1/2 and 3 are 38.8 and 11.6%, respectively. In addition, potential molecular mechanisms underlying the development of AI-HFSR are poorly understood and urgently needed to be investigated histologically. In this review, we summarize and review the current efficacy of apatinib and the prevalence of AI-HFSR in Chinese patients with liver cancer. Besides, we postulate the potential mechanisms underlying the development of AI-HFSR and discuss the optimal clinical management for this unwanted cutaneous side effect.