thermooptic coefficient
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Keunhee Cho ◽  
Sung Tae Kim ◽  
Young-Hwan Park ◽  
Jeong-Rae Cho

The present study intends to provide the photoelastic coefficient and thermal expansion coefficient needed to use an FBG-embedded CFRP rod (smart rod) as strain sensor. Due to the monolithic combination of the FBG sensor with a CFRP rod, the smart rod is likely to exhibit thermal and mechanical properties differing from those of the bare FBG sensor. A tensile test showed that the photoelastic coefficient of the smart rod is 0.204, which is about 7.3% lower than the 0.22 value of the bare optical FBG. Moreover, the thermal expansion coefficient of the smart rod obtained through a thermal test appeared to be negative with a low value of −0.190×10−6/°C. Consequently, the temperature dependence of the smart rod is mainly expressed by means of the thermooptic coefficient. Compared to the bare FBG sensor, the smart rod is easier to handle and can measure compressive strains, which make it a convenient sensor for various concrete structures.


2000 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 117-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
BAOLONG YU ◽  
YUZONG GU ◽  
YANLI MAO ◽  
CONGSHAN ZHU ◽  
FUXI GAN

The thermooptic coefficient dn/dT and the thermal-induced refractive index n2 of PbS nanoparticles in organosol were measured. The optical limiting properties of PbS nanoparticles were studied under continuous wave (cw) laser illumination. The obtained results were analyzed and discussed.


1991 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 625-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Jianguo ◽  
Zhang Chunping ◽  
Zhang Guangyin

1977 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 436 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Harris ◽  
G. T. Johnston ◽  
G. A. Kepple ◽  
P. C. Krok ◽  
H. Mukai

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document