comparison strategy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

20
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 110925
Author(s):  
Oksana Butuzova ◽  
Nikolay Pakudin ◽  
Andrey Minarsky ◽  
Nikolay Bessonov ◽  
Nadya Morozova

Author(s):  
Atanu Bhattacharjee ◽  
Gajendra K. Vishwakarma ◽  
Souvik Banerjee ◽  
Sharvari Shukla

The constant news about the corona virus is scary. It is not possible to separate treatment for Cancer due to COVID-19. An effective treatment comparison strategy is needed. We need to have a handy tool to understand cancer progression in this unprecedented scenario. Linking different events of cancer progression is the need of the hour. It is a methodological challenge. We provide the solutions to overcome the issue with interval between two consecutive events in motivating head and neck cancer (HNC) data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 817-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiming Shan ◽  
Dong Guo ◽  
Quanshu Gu ◽  
Yudong Li ◽  
Yongquan Li ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Towler ◽  
David White ◽  
Richard I. Kemp

2011 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris A C Parker ◽  
Hong Zhang

Intelligent entities must often make decisions by comparing several candidate alternatives and selecting the best one. This is just as true for autonomous swarms as it is for solitary robots, but to date there has been little work to propose efficient comparison behaviors for autonomous robotic swarms that are not tied to specific environments. In this work, we examine an elegant collective comparison strategy that is used by at least three different species of social insect and adapt it for artificial systems. The behavior is particularly attractive for robotic implementations because it relies only on short range explicit peer-to-peer communication, eliminating the need for chemical trails or other forms of stigmergy. The proposed comparison strategy is proven to converge, and a series of experiments using real robots with noisy sensors is presented that validates our theoretical analysis. Using the proposed behavior, a robotic swarm is able to compare alternatives collectively more accurately than its member robots would be able to individually.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document