Opening injection pressure monitoring using an in-line device does not prevent intraneural injection in an isolated nerve model

BackgroundInjection pressure monitoring using in-line devices is affordable and easy to implement into a regional anesthesia practice. However, solid evidence regarding their performance is lacking. We aimed to evaluate if opening injection pressure (OIP), measured with a disposable in-line pressure monitor, can prevent intraneural (subepineural) injection using 15 pound per square inch (PSI) as the reference safety threshold.MethodsAn isolated nerve model with six tibial and six common peroneal nerves from three unembalmed fresh cadavers was used for this observational study. A mixture of 0.5% ropivacaine with methylene blue was injected intraneurally at a rate of 10 mL/min, to a maximum of 3 mL. OIP was recorded for each injection as well as evidence of intraneural contrast. Injected volume at 15 and 20 PSI was recorded, and when it leaked out the epineurium, if it occurred.ResultsIn all cases, OIP was<15 PSI and intraneural contrast was evident before the safety threshold. The 15–20 PSI mark was attained in 5 of 12 injections (41%), with a median injected volume of 0.9 mL (range 0.4–2.3 mL). Peak pressure of >20 PSI was reached in two injections (at 0.6 mL and 2.7 mL). Contrast leaked out the epineurium in 11 of 12 injections (91%) with a median injected volume of 0.6 mL (range 0.1–1.3 mL).ConclusionsOur results suggest that in-line pressure monitoring may not prevent intraneural injection using an injection pressure of 15 PSI as reference threshold. Due to the preliminary nature of our study, further evidence is needed to demonstrate clinical relevance.

Intertruncal approach to the supraclavicular brachial plexus, current controversies and technical update: a daring discourse

We propose a new approach to local anesthetic injection for the supraclavicular brachial plexus block: an intertruncal approach by which local anesthetic is deposited in the two adipose tissue planes between the upper and middle and the middle and lower trunks. We present sonographic and microscopic images to illustrate the relevant anatomy. This approach offers potential advantages over the ‘corner pocket’ technique in that it results in consistent local anesthetic spread to the three plexus trunks and the needle endpoint lies farther away from the pleural surface which is important for the prevention of pneumothorax. It also offers an advantage over the ‘intracluster’ approach as it purposefully avoids intraneural injection respecting the integrity of the epineurium of individual trunks. Comparative studies are required to confirm that these anatomic and technical advantages result in improved outcomes.

Extrafasicular and Intraperineural, but No Endoneural, Spread after Deliberate Intraneural Injections in a Cadaveric Study

Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background There is confusion regarding the spread of intraneurally injected local anesthetic agents during regional anesthesia. The aim of this research was to deliberately inject a marker that does not leave the neural compartment into which it is injected, and then to study the longitudinal and circumferential spread and possible pathways of intraneural spread. Methods After institutional review board approval, we intraneurally injected 20 and 5 ml of heparinized blood solution under ultrasound guidance into 12 sciatic nerves in the popliteal fossa and 10 median nerves, respectively, of eight fresh, unembalmed cadavers using standard 22-gauge “D” needles, mimicking the blocks in clinical conditions. Ultrasound evidence of nerve swelling confirmed intraneural injection. Samples of the nerves were then examined under light and scanning electron microscopy. Results Extrafascicular spread was observed in all the adipocyte-containing neural compartments of the 664 cross-section samples we examined, but intrafascicular spread was seen in only 6 cross-sections of two nerves. None of the epineurium, perineurium, or neural components were disrupted in any of the samples. Spread between the layers of the perineurium was a route of spread that included the perineurium surrounding the fascicles and the perineurium that formed incomplete septa in the fascicles. Similar to the endoneurium proper, subepineural compartments that did not contain any fat cells did not reveal any spread of heparinized blood solution cells. No “perineural” spaces were observed within the endoneurium. We also did not observe any true intrafascicular spread. Conclusions After deliberate intraneural injection, longitudinal and circumferential extrafascicular spread occurred in all instances in the neural compartments that contained adipocytes, but not in the relatively solid endoneurium of the fascicles.

Subparaneural injection in popliteal sciatic nerve blocks evaluated by MRI

Intraneural injection of a local anesthetic can damage the nerve, yet it occurs frequently during distal sciatic block with no neurological sequelae. This has led to a controversy about the optimal needle tip placement that results from the particular anatomy of the sciatic nerve with its paraneural sheath.The study population included patients undergoing lower extremity surgery under popliteal sciatic nerve block. Ultrasound-guidance was used to position the needle tip subparaneurally and to monitor the injection of the local anesthetic. Sonography and magnetic resonance imaging were used to assess the extent of the subparaneural injection.Twenty-two patients participated. The median sciatic cross-sectional area increased from 57.8 mm2 pre-block to 110.8 mm2 immediately post-block. An intraneural injection according to the current definition was seen in 21 patients. Two patients had sonographic evidence of an intrafascicular injection, which was confirmed by MRI in one patient (the other patient refused further examinations). No patient reported any neurological symptoms.A subparaneural injection in the popliteal segment of the distal sciatic nerve is actually rarely intraneural, i.e. intrafascicular. This may explain the discrepancy between the conventional sonographic evidence of an intraneural injection and the lack of neurological sequelae.