The Role of Internal Limiting Membrane Flap for Highly Myopic Macular Hole Retinal Detachment: Improving the Closure Rate but Leading to Excessive Gliosis

Purpose: To investigate the surgical outcomes of the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique for macular hole retinal detachment (MHRD) in high myopia.Methods: This was a retrospective interventional study on 45 highly myopic eyes with MHRD after ILM peeling (n = 24, peeling group) or the inverted ILM flap technique (n = 21, inverted group). The inverted group was consisted of autologous blood (AB) subgroup (n = 10) and perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL) subgroup (n = 11). MH closure, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal microstructures, and excessive gliosis were analyzed during a follow-up of over 12 months.Results: The inverted group achieved a higher MH closure rate (95.24%) than the peeling group (41.67%; p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in postoperative BCVA between the two groups (p = 0.98) or between the closed MH with or without excessive gliosis (p = 0.60). Excessive gliosis was identified in 9 eyes in the inverted group, and there was no difference in the incidence of excessive gliosis between the AB subgroup (4 in 10 eyes, 40%) and the PFCL subgroup (5 in 11 eyes, 45.45%) (p > 0.999).Conclusion: The inverted ILM flap technique was effective in MH closure but had no advantage in postoperative BCVA and microstructural restoration. Excessive gliosis was only detected in the inverted group but did not affect the postoperative BCVA. Additionally, the incidence of excessive gliosis was not affected by adjuvants.

Human amniotic membrane for failed macular hole. A case of initial unsuccessful outcome that resolved after amniotic membrane exchange

Introduction We described a case of initial unsuccessful outcome of failed macular hole treated with amniotic membrane, that resolved after amniotic membrane exchange and silicone oil injection. Case Description a woman affected by a high myopic macular hole that had failed to close after multiple surgeries, had been treated using an amniotic membrane graft and 20% sulfur hexafluoride but, after the gas reabsorption, the macular hole was still open, and the amniotic membrane. A second surgery with a second amniotic membrane patch and silicone oil was carried out. Two weeks after the procedure the macular hole closed, and the final visual acuity improved from 20/400 to 20/100. Conclusions In this case, a second surgery, using a new amniotic membrane graft and a longer-lasting endotamponade, closed the hole and improved the visual acuity.

Risk Factors For Recurrent Myopic Macular Hole Retinal Detachment After Silicone Oil Removal In Patients With Open Flat Macular Hole

Purpose: To evaluate the risks that might be associated with recurrent macular hole retinal detachment (Re MHRD) after silicone oil (S.O) removal in myopic patients with open flat macular hole (MH). Methods: In this retrospective series, we assessed the different factors that might be associated with recurrent MHRD after S.O removal in 48 eyes with open flat MH that underwent S.O removal after successful MHRD repair by dividing the enrolled eyes into 2 groups: group 1 included 38 eyes with flat open MH and flat retina after S.O removal and group 2 included 10 eyes with flat open MH and recurrent MHRD after S.O removal. Results: Ten of 48 eyes (20.8%) with open flat MH developed recurrent MHRD after S.O removal. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that MH at the apex of PS, MH minimum diameter, hole form factor (HFF) and MH index (MHI) were significant risk factors for recurrent MHRD after S.O removal in myopic patients with open flat MH. Conclusions: If there is a "flat open" MH that is large, located at the apex of PS or with HHF or MHI of less than 0.9-0.5, it has a high chance of recurrent MHRD after S.O removal.

A customized posterior scleral reinforcement for myopic macular hole with retinal detachment and posterior staphyloma: A case report

The author describes a customized posterior scleral reinforcement, its manufacturing method, the rationale of its therapeutic effect, and the surgical technique of its implantation. A 54-year-old female patient with a case history of myopic macular hole with retinal detachment and posterior staphyloma, refractory to pars plana vitrectomy and peeling of internal limiting membrane, underwent posterior scleral reinforcement treatment. Retinal reattachment and macular hole closure were obtained. Best corrected visual acuity increased from light perception to 20/160 Snellen. The pars plana vitrectomy is mandatory to remove vitreoretinal tractions and epiretinal membranes; furthermore, the internal limiting membrane peeling makes retina less rigid. However, it may not be sufficient to allow retinal reattachment and it plays no preventive role in limiting posterior staphyloma progression. The rationale of posterior scleral reinforcement is to reduce retinal stretching, to contain posterior staphyloma, and to limit its progression over time.