Reassessing the value of gastroscopy for the investigation of dyspepsia

ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic yield of investigating dyspepsia with oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) with or without mucosal biopsy.DesignRetrospective service evaluation study.SettingTwo teaching hospitals: The Royal Hallamshire Hospital and Northern General Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.Patients500 patients, 55 years of age and over, who underwent OGD to investigate dyspepsia were included. The study period included a 3-month window. All OGDs were performed on an outpatient basis.InterventionsData were extracted from electronic OGD records within the study period.Main outcome measuresDiagnostic yield provided by endoscopic examination and histological assessment.Results378 patients (75.6%) were reported to have some form of endoscopic abnormality, and 417 patients (83.4%) had biopsies taken. The most common findings at OGD were gastritis (47.2%) and oesophagitis (24.4%). Oesophagogastric malignancy was seen in 1%. Diagnoses made endoscopically or histologically that would not have been appropriately managed by empirical therapies were seen in 16.2%.ConclusionOGD in dyspepsia influences patient management in approximately one-sixth of cases. However, the majority of patients are sufficiently managed with Helicobacter pylori testing and eradication and/or a trial of proton pump inhibitor therapy. Further non-invasive approaches are needed to identify patients who need endoscopy for biopsy or therapy.

Validation of a food-frequency questionnaire for use in pregnancy

ObjectivesAs a part of an ongoing project to develop a nutritional screening tool, we evaluated the performance of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in terms of validity in a Sheffield Caucasian pregnant population using two different statistical approaches – the correlation coefficient and the limits of agreement (LOA). The FFQ was designed specifically for pregnant women and previously used in a large-scale study.DesignA validation study.SettingA community-based field study of a general population of pregnant women booked for their first antenatal appointment at the Jessop Wing, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.SubjectsOne hundred and twenty-three women of different socio-economic status, aged between 17 and 43 years, provided complete dietary data.ResultsThe validity of the FFQ was tested against a series of two 24-hour recalls. As expected, the intakes of all examined nutrients, except for iodine, carotene, vitamin E, biotin, vitamin C and alcohol, were higher when determined by the FFQ than when determined by 24-hour recall. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the two methods ranged from 0.19 (added sugar, zinc) to 0.47 (Englyst fibre). The LOA were broader for some of the nutrients, e.g. protein, Southgate fibre and alcohol, and an increasing lack of agreement between the two methods was identified with higher dietary intakes.ConclusionsThe FFQ gave useful estimates of the nutrient intakes of Caucasian pregnant women and appears to be a valid tool for categorising pregnant women according to dietary intake. The FFQ performed well for most nutrients and had acceptable agreement with the 24-hour recall.

Prediction of Obliteration of Arteriovenous Malformations after Radiosurgery: the Obliteration Prediction Index

ABSTRACT:Objective:To describe the response to single dose photon stereotactic radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) so that the probability of success or failure of treatment may be predicted for the individual patient.Method:The obliteration prediction index (OPI) was calculated for AVMs by dividing the marginal dose of radiation in Gray (Gy) by the lesion diameter in centimetres in cohorts of 42 patients treated with the modified linear accelerator at Toronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre and 394 patients treated with the gamma unit at the Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom. Patients were grouped into ranges by OPI and the proportion of success and failure was calculated for each group. An exponential function [P = 1-A•e(-B-OPI)] was fitted to the data by the least squares method.Results:Despite systematic differences in radiation treatment, that is, marginal doses of 15 and 20 Gy in Toronto and most Sheffield patients with a marginal dose of 25 Gy, the resultant data points exhibited similar behaviour.Conclusion:The function [P = 1-A•e(-B-OPI)] partly describes the biological effect of radiation and is independent of the radiation device used. Radiosurgery centres can use this model to facilitate predictions of successful treatment for individual patients.