sodium channel inactivation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

97
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

29
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Sarah Goethals ◽  
Martijn Christiaan Sierksma ◽  
Xavier Nicol ◽  
Annabelle Reaux-Le Goazigo ◽  
Romain Brette

The action potential of most vertebrate neurons initiates in the axon initial segment (AIS), and is then transmitted to the soma where it is regenerated by somatodendritic sodium channels. For successful transmission, the AIS must produce a strong axial current, so as to depolarize the soma to the threshold for somatic regeneration. Theoretically, this axial current depends on AIS geometry and Na+ conductance density. We measured the axial current of mouse retinal ganglion cells using whole-cell recordings with post-hoc AIS labeling. We found that this current is large, implying high Na+ conductance density, and carries a charge that co-varies with capacitance so as to depolarize the soma by ~30 mV. Additionally, we observed that the axial current attenuates strongly with depolarization, consistent with sodium channel inactivation, but temporally broadens so as to preserve the transmitted charge. Thus, the AIS appears to be organized so as to reliably backpropagate the axonal action potential.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Goethals ◽  
Martijn C. Sierksma ◽  
Xavier Nicol ◽  
Annabelle Réaux-Le Goazigo ◽  
Romain Brette

AbstractThe action potential of most vertebrate neurons initiates in the axon initial segment (AIS), and is then transmitted to the soma where it is regenerated by somatodendritic sodium channels. For successful transmission, the AIS must produce a strong axial current, so as to depolarize the soma to the threshold for somatic regeneration. Theoretically, this axial current depends on AIS geometry and Na+ conductance density. We measured the axial current of mouse RGCs using whole-cell recordings with post-hoc AIS labeling. We found that this current is large, implying high Na+ conductance density, and carries a charge that co-varies with capacitance so as to depolarize the soma by ~30 mV. Additionally, we observed that the axial current attenuates strongly with depolarization, consistent with sodium channel inactivation, but temporally broadens so as to preserve the transmitted charge. Thus, the AIS appears to be organized so as to reliably backpropagate the axonal action potential.


2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 1084-1096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silas E. Busch ◽  
Arseny S. Khakhalin

For a biological neural network to be functional, its neurons need to be connected with synapses of appropriate strength, and each neuron needs to appropriately respond to its synaptic inputs. This second aspect of network tuning is maintained by intrinsic plasticity; yet it is often considered secondary to changes in connectivity and mostly limited to adjustments of overall excitability of each neuron. Here we argue that even nonoscillatory neurons can be tuned to inputs of different temporal dynamics and that they can routinely adjust this tuning to match the statistics of their synaptic activation. Using the dynamic clamp technique, we show that, in the tectum of Xenopus tadpole, neurons become selective for faster inputs when animals are exposed to fast visual stimuli but remain responsive to longer inputs in animals exposed to slower, looming, or multisensory stimulation. We also report a homeostatic cotuning between synaptic and intrinsic temporal properties of individual tectal cells. These results expand our understanding of intrinsic plasticity in the brain and suggest that there may exist an additional dimension of network tuning that has been so far overlooked. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We use dynamic clamp to show that individual neurons in the tectum of Xenopus tadpoles are selectively tuned to either shorter (more synchronous) or longer (less synchronous) synaptic inputs. We also demonstrate that this intrinsic temporal tuning is strongly shaped by sensory experiences. This new phenomenon, which is likely to be mediated by changes in sodium channel inactivation, is bound to have important consequences for signal processing and the development of local recurrent connections.


2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 2001-2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Y Sachkova ◽  
Shir A Singer ◽  
Jason Macrander ◽  
Adam M Reitzel ◽  
Steve Peigneur ◽  
...  

Abstract The cnidarian Nematostella vectensis has become an established lab model, providing unique opportunities for venom evolution research. The Nematostella venom system is multimodal: involving both nematocytes and ectodermal gland cells, which produce a toxin mixture whose composition changes throughout the life cycle. Additionally, their modes of interaction with predators and prey vary between eggs, larvae, and adults, which is likely shaped by the dynamics of the venom system. Nv1 is a major component of adult venom, with activity against arthropods (through specific inhibition of sodium channel inactivation) and fish. Nv1 is encoded by a cluster of at least 12 nearly identical genes that were proposed to be undergoing concerted evolution. Surprisingly, we found that Nematostella venom includes several Nv1 paralogs escaping a pattern of general concerted evolution, despite belonging to the Nv1-like family. Here, we show two of these new toxins, Nv4 and Nv5, are lethal for zebrafish larvae but harmless to arthropods, unlike Nv1. Furthermore, unlike Nv1, the newly identified toxins are expressed in early life stages. Using transgenesis and immunostaining, we demonstrate that Nv4 and Nv5 are localized to ectodermal gland cells in larvae. The evolution of Nv4 and Nv5 can be described either as neofunctionalization or as subfunctionalization. Additionally, the Nv1-like family includes several pseudogenes being an example of nonfunctionalization and venom evolution through birth-and-death mechanism. Our findings reveal the evolutionary history for a toxin radiation and point toward the ecological function of the novel toxins constituting a complex cnidarian venom.


2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 694-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rikke Heide ◽  
Hugh Bostock ◽  
Lise Ventzel ◽  
Peter Grafe ◽  
Joseph Bergmans ◽  
...  

Channels ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Mangold ◽  
Brittany D. Brumback ◽  
Paweorn Angsutararux ◽  
Taylor L. Voelker ◽  
Wandi Zhu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Peter A. Abdelmalik ◽  
Goran Rakocevic

AbstractBackground:Critical illness polyneuropathy (CIN) and critical illness myopathy (CIM), together “ICU-Acquired weakness (ICUAW),” occur frequently in septic patients. One of the proposed mechanisms for ICUAW includes prolonged inactivation of sodium channels. Propofol, used commonly in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), primarily acts via enhancement of GABAergic transmission but may also increase sodium channel inactivation, suggesting a potential interaction.Methods:Electronic medical records and EMG reports of patients with ICUAW and a diagnosis of either sepsis, septicaemia, severe sepsis, or septic shock, concurrent with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure (ARF), were retrospectively analyzed in a single center university hospital.Results:74 cases were identified (50.0% men, age 58±14 years), and compared to age- and sex-matched controls. Of these, 51 (69%) had CIN, 19 (26%) had CIM, and 4 (5%) had both. Propofol exposure was significantly higher in patients with ICUAW compared to controls (63.5% vs. 33.8%, p<0.001). The odds ratio of developing ICUAW with propofol exposure was 3.4 (95% CI:1.7-6.7, p<0.001). Patients with ICUAW had significantly more days in hospital (59±44 vs. 30±23) and ICU (38±26 vs. 17±13), days dependent on mechanical ventilation (27±21 vs. 13±16), and rates of tracheostomy (79.7% vs. 36.5%) and gastrostomy (75.7% vs. 25.7%) (all p<0.001). They also received a significantly higher number of distinct intravenous antibiotics, cumulative days of antibiotic therapy, and exposure to vasopressors and paralytics.Conclusions:Propofol exposure may increase the risk of ICUAW in septic patients. An interaction through sodium channel inactivation is hypothesized.


2016 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 108a ◽  
Author(s):  
Kin Lam ◽  
Zhe Wu ◽  
Klaus Schulten

Author(s):  
M-R. Ghovanloo ◽  
K. Aimar ◽  
R. Ghadiry-Tavi ◽  
A. Yu ◽  
P.C. Ruben

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document