multilayer welding
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hosta Ardhyananta ◽  
Punyamanta Nandra Pradipta ◽  
Agung Purniawan ◽  
Mas Irfan Purbawanto Hidayat ◽  
Imah Luluk Kusminah

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (05) ◽  
pp. 1190-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaromir Moravec ◽  
Tomasz Kik ◽  
Iva Novakova

Author(s):  
Hans-Werner Viehrig ◽  
Mario Houska ◽  
Eberhard Altstadt

Reactor pressure vessel (RPV) multilayer welding seams show an inhomogeneous structure. It raises concerns that the evaluation of non-uniform material might not be amenable to the statistical analysis methods on which the Master Curve approach is based. In particular with regard to weld metals, it can be expected that the cleavage fracture toughness is strongly influenced by the orientation of the Charpy size SE(B) specimen. The T-L oriented SE(B) specimen (axis axial and crack propagation in circumferential direction) comprises of various welding beads along the crack front whereas in a L-S specimen (axis axial and crack propagation through the thickness) the crack tip is located in one welding bead with an approximately uniform structure. The paper summarises fracture toughness results measured on welding seams of decommissioned and non-commissioned RPVs of WWER type nuclear reactors and the non-commissioned Biblis-C RPV. Specimens of T-L and T-S orientation were tested. The results show, that in general the cleavage fracture toughness values, KJc-1T, follow the Master Curve description. However, the number of KJc-1T data outside the 2% and 98% tolerance bounds is larger than predicted by the underlying model, which indicates non-uniform material. There is a large variation in the evaluated through thickness T0 values of the investigated multilayer beltline welding seams. Within the sampling range of the surveillance specimens, T0 values vary with a span of 30 to about 60 K depending on the applied welding technology. The fracture toughness strongly depends on the intrinsic weld bead structure. Hence, the position of the fatigue crack tip of the pre-cracked SE(B) specimen at the multilayer welding seam is crucial and defines the cleavage fracture toughness. Modified Master Curve based evaluation procedures like the MC based approach of the SINTAP procedure were applied to get fracture toughness values which are representative for the most brittle fraction the test series. Despite of the pronounced non-homogeneity of the micro-structure along the crack front of T-L specimens, crack initiation sites are randomly distributed along the crack front. This means that one of the basic assumptions in ASTM E1921, i.e. the uniform distribution of initiation sites, is fulfilled also for the T-L specimens from the multilayer weld metal.


2013 ◽  
Vol 768-769 ◽  
pp. 660-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Kromm ◽  
Thomas Kannengiesser

Innovative low transformation temperature (LTT) welding filler materials are featuring a characteristic chemical composition which favors the formation of martensite at comparatively low temperatures. This permits deliberate adjustment of welding residual stresses. Even though numerous investigations can be found in the literature on this issue, they provide only little insight into the interaction between phase transformation and resulting welding residual stresses. For this purpose, a component weld test was performed in a special large-scale testing facility. The results illustrate that the desired residual stress control by using LTT alloys is actually feasible. With increasing shrinkage restraint, however, higher tensile residual stresses are formed in transverse direction of the weld. By contrast, the residual stress level in longitudinal weld direction is nearly independent of the restraint conditions. On-line stress analysis revealed that the amount of stress reduction during cooling of the individual weld runs is dependent on the weld volume undergoing phase transformation. Overall, evidence was furnished that the approach of residual stress engineering by LTT alloys is suitable even in the case of large-scale multilayer welding.


2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 1003002
Author(s):  
李俐群 Li Liqun ◽  
张亮 Zhang Liang ◽  
戴景明 Dai Jingming

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 1251-1255 ◽  
Author(s):  
李俐群 Li Liqun ◽  
陶汪 Tao Wang ◽  
朱先亮 Zhu Xianliang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document