Long-term complications after stent assist coiling dependent on clopidogrel response

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary for stent assisted coiling. However, long term use of DAPT has a potential risk of hemorrhagic events. We aimed to examine the relationship between clopidogrel reactivity and complications. Methods Patients who underwent stent assisted coiling for unruptured aneurysms or previously treated aneurysms and received periprocedural DAPT in our institution between August 2011 to March 2020 were included. Platelet reactivity for clopidogrel was measured by VerifyNow assay system, and we defined the cut off value of P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU) at 208 and classified patients as hypo-responders (PRU≧208) or responders (PRU<208). The rates of hemorrhagic and thrombotic events within 30 days (acute phase) and 30 days after the procedure (delayed phase) were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, changes in hemoglobin levels were measured before and after the procedure and at chronic stages (1 to 6 months thereafter). Results From 61 patients included in this study, 36 patients were hypo-responders and 25 patients were responders. Hemorrhagic events occurred 8.0% only in responders in the acute phase (p = 0.16), and 2.78% in hypo-responders and 20.0% in responders in the delayed phase (p = 0.037). Changes in hemoglobin levels before and after the procedure were 1.22 g/dl in hypo-responders and 1.74 g/dl in responders (p = 0.032) while before the procedure and chronic stages they were 0.39 g/dl in hypo-responders and 1.39 g/dl in responders (p < 0.01). Thrombotic events were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion Long term use of DAPT after stent assisted coiling is related to hemorrhagic events in the delayed phase. Preventing for hemorrhagic events, the duration of DAPT should be carefully considered in clopidogrel responders.

Reduction of thromboembolic complications during the endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms by employing a tailored dual antiplatelet regimen using aspirin and prasugrel

BackgroundThromboembolic complications (TECs) are frequent during the endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. To prevent TECs, dual antiplatelet therapy using aspirin and clopidogrel is recommended for the perioperative period. In patients with a poor response, clopidogrel is a risk factor for TECs. To prevent TECs, our study assessed the stratified use of prasugrel.MethodsPatients who underwent endovascular therapy for unruptured cerebral aneurysms from April 2017 to August 2019 were enrolled in this clinical study and given premedication with aspirin and clopidogrel for 2 weeks prior to the procedure. P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) were measured using the VerifyNow assay on the day before the procedure (tailored group). In subgroups with PRU <240, the clopidogrel dose was maintained (CPG subgroup). In subgroups with PRU ≥240, clopidogrel was changed to prasugrel (PSG subgroup). We compared the occurrence of TECs with retrospective consecutive cases from January 2015 to March 2017 without PRU assessments (non-tailored group). The frequency of TECs within 30 days was assessed as the primary endpoint.ResultsThe tailored and non-tailored groups comprised 167 and 50 patients, respectively. TECs occurred in 11 (6.6%) and 8 (16%) patients in the tailored and non-tailored groups (P=0.048), respectively. The HR for TECs was significantly reduced in the tailored group (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.81); P=0.017) compared with the non-tailored group.ConclusionThe results suggest that tailored dual antiplatelet therapy medication with PRU significantly reduces the frequency of TECs without increasing hemorrhagic complications.

Long-term Complications After Stent Assist Coiling Dependent on Clopidogrel Response

BACKGROUND: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary for stent assisted coiling. However, long term use of DAPT has a potential risk of hemorrhagic events. We aimed to examine the relationship between clopidogrel reactivity and complications.METHODS: Patients who underwent stent assisted coiling for unruptured aneurysms and received periprocedural DAPT in our institution between August 2011 to March 2020 were included. Platelet reactivity for clopidogrel was measured by VerifyNow assay system, and we defined the cut off value of P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU) at 208, and classified patients as hypo-responders (PRU≧208) or responders (PRU＜208). The rates of hemorrhagic and thrombotic events within 30 days (acute phase) and 30 days after the procedure (delayed phase) were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, changes in hemoglobin levels were measured before and after the procedure and at chronic stages (1 to 6 months thereafter).RESULTS: From 62 patients included in this study, 36 patients were hypo-responders and 26 patients were responders. Hemorrhagic events occurred 7.7% only in responders in the acute phase (p = 0.17), and 2.78% in hypo-responders and 23.1% in responders in the delayed phase (p = 0.02). Changes in hemoglobin levels before and after the procedure were 1.21 g/dl in hypo-responders and 1.92 g/dl in responders (p = 0.02) while before the procedure and chronic stages they were 0.39g/dl in hypo-responders and 1.41 g/dl in responders (p < 0.01). Thrombotic events were not significantly different between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Long term use of DAPT after stent assisted coiling is related to hemorrhagic events in the delayed phase. Preventing for hemorrhagic events, the duration of DAPT should be carefully considered in clopidogrel responders.

P25 Polymorphism of CYP2C19 is associated with poor platelet response to clopidogrel and indirectly affect TIMIi-flow among asian patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI

Background The platelet response to clopidogrel treatment is very important in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI. Asian populations have been shown to have higher proportion of CYP2C19 gene polymorphism that may alter biotransformation of clopidogrel, than Caucasians. However, It is unclear whether platelet reactivity measured by P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) is affected by CYP2C19 polymorphism, and whether it will impair coronary flow among Asian patients with STEMI after primary PCI. Purpose: We sought to define whether polymorphisms on CYP2C19 genes will affect platelet reactivity response to Clopidgrel therapy, and whether subsequently it will affect the TIMI flow in Asian patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Method: We studied 90 patients with STEMI receiving 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel prior to primary PCI. High-on-treatment platelet reactivity was evaluated using the VerifyNow Assay. Patients with platelet reactivity more than 208 PRU are categorized as non-responders to Clopidogrel. Genotyping of CYP2C19 was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Post primary PCI TIMI flow was categorized into good (TIMI flow 3), and impaired (TIMI flow &lt;3). Results: Among all 90 patients (median age = 54.5 years old; 93.3% male), there were 36.6 % patients with CYP2C19 polymorhisms, carrying *2 or *3 alleles. Platelet reactivity test revealed 23.4% of all patients were Clopidogrel non-responders. Multivariate analysis showed CYP2C19 polymorphism is associated with Clopidogrel non-reponders (OR 4.7, p = 0.030), along with other factors such as: Diabetes, Renal impairment, and use of proton pump inhibitor drugs. After successful stent implantation during primary PCI, there were 24.4% patients still with TIMI flow &lt; 3. There was no direct correlation between CYP2C19 polymorphism and TIMI flow &lt; 3 after primary PCI. However, we found significant association between Clopidogrel non-reponders and TMI flow &lt; 3 after primary PCI in those STEMI patients (OR 3.3, p = 0.046). Conclusions: In Asian patients with STEMI receiving clopidogrel prior to primary PCI, the CYP2C19 polymorphisms is associated with poor platelet response to Clopidogrel therapy. The Clopidogrel non-responders is associated with impaired TIMI flow after primary PCI.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Cold-Stored Platelets in Healthy Human Subjects Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy

Background: Platelets are currently stored at 22°C (room temperature-stored) for clinical purposes. This approach has numerous downsides including limited storage time due to risk of bacterial growth, and increased costs caused by bacterial testing or pathogen reduction. Platelets stored at 4ºC (cold-stored) were the standard of care in the 1960s and 70s, and while they generally perform better than room temperature-stored platelets in in vitro assays, functional studies in vivo have yielded contradictory results. Methods: Eight healthy human participants were included in the analysis of this randomized, cross-over study. A double unit of apheresis platelets was collected from each subject for autologous transfusion. Platelets were stored for 5 days at either 4ºC, or 22ºC, based on randomization. On day 5, platelets were transfused 12-24 hours after participants received a loading dose of acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel. An array of platelet function testing was done at baseline, after loading dose, and after transfusion (1h, 4h, 24h). The first round was followed by a wash-out period of at least 10 days, and a second sequence of collection, antiplatelet loading dose, and transfusion with platelets stored under alternate conditions from the first sequence. The primary endpoint was defined as post-transfusion platelet αIIbβ3 integrin activation in response to agonists for pathways inhibited by dual antiplatelet therapy, measured by the VerifyNOW assay. Secondary endpoints included platelet function testing by bleeding time, VASP-phosphorylation, light transmission aggregometry, and flow cytometric analysis of platelet αIIbβ3 integrin activation and α-granule secretion. Results: All cold-stored platelet units passed quality control analyses, and no platelet aggregates were observed at the end of the storage period. One room temperature-stored unit had to be discarded due to quality control failure. Transfusion of a double unit with 5 day cold-stored platelets was tolerated well by all recipients. The absolute number of transfused platelets did not differ significantly between the cold-storage arm and the room temperature storage arm. The corrected count increment did not differ significantly at 1h after transfusion, but was significantly lower in the cold-stored group at the 4h, and 24h time points. The primary endpoint, platelet function testing by VerifyNOW, showed reversal of the effect of acetylsalicylic acid with both products at 1h and 4h post transfusion, but platelet inhibition re-appeared after 24h post transfusion in the cold-storage arm, presumably due to accelerated clearance of cold-stored platelets. No significant differences were observed between the two products in the VerifyNOW assay for clopidogrel. The bleeding time (a secondary endpoint) did not differ significantly at any time point between the cold-stored and room temperature-stored transfusion group. However, the bleeding time improved or remained unchanged in all recipients transfused with room temperature-stored platelets, whereas, transfusion of cold-stored platelets caused prolongation of the bleeding time in 50% of recipients. Surprisingly, platelets isolated from recipients of room temperature-stored platelets aggregated significantly better in response to collagen compared to platelets isolated from recipients of cold-stored platelets at 1h and 4h post transfusion. Other secondary endpoints, including VASP-phosphorylation, αIIbβ3 integrin activation and α-granule secretion by flow cytometry, and platelet aggregation in response to arachidonic acid and ADP did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: We report the first safety and efficacy data of 5 day cold stored platelets in plasma. Unexpectedly, some endpoints demonstrate agonist- and assay-dependent inferiority of cold-stored platelets at early and late time points. Further studies are needed to determine the maximum storage time, and the efficacy of cold-stored platelets in actively bleeding patients and patients with platelet dysfunction. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Influence of Amlodipine on Haemostatic Measurements during Clopidogrel Treatment in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Amlodipine has a potential to reduce clopidogrel bioactivation through the cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme in vivo, but the clinical impact of this interaction remains controversial. This randomized, open-label, two-period, crossover study was performed to evaluate the influence of amlodipine on the haemostatic profiles of high-risk patients during clopidogrel treatment. We recruited 40 Asian patients (Male/Female: n = 36/4) receiving clopidogrel (75 mg/day), aspirin (100 mg/day) and rosuvastatin for at least 6 months following percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 5 mg daily amlodipine or not for 2 weeks, and then were crossed over to the other treatment for 2 weeks. Haemostatic measurements were conducted with the VerifyNow assay and thromboelastography (TEG). Primary endpoint was P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU) during on- versus off-amlodipine treatment. The on-amlodipine strategy showed higher level of PRU compared with the off-amlodipine strategy (176.8 ± 75.4 vs. 150.7 ± 65.5 PRU; ∆mean: 26.1 PRU; ∆95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.5–47.7 PRU; p = 0.019). Platelet-fibrin clot strength measured by TEG was lower during on- versus off-amlodipine treatment (7,712 ± 1,889 vs. 8,559 ± 2,174 dyne/cm2; ∆mean: –847 dyne/cm2; ∆95% CI: –1,632 to –62 dyne/cm2; p = 0.035). After amlodipine discontinuation, 27 patients (67.5%) showed a decrease in PRU, which was associated with ‘PRU ≥ 160 on-amlodipine’ in multivariate analysis (odds ratio: 62.014; 95% CI: 2.302–1670.328; p = 0.014). In conclusion, amlodipine increases platelet reactivity and decreases platelet-fibrin clot strength during clopidogrel treatment. In addition, the effect of amlodipine discontinuation on clopidogrel responsiveness is associated with on-amlodipine platelet reactivity.

Laboratory assessments of therapeutic platelet inhibition in endovascular neurosurgery: comparing results of the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay to thromboelastography with platelet mapping

OBJECTIVEInhibition of platelet aggregation is vital to preventing thromboembolic complications related to stent placement in endovascular neurosurgery, but excessive inhibition potentiates hemorrhagic complications. Recent evidence suggests an ideal inhibition range of 70–150 P2Y12 response units (PRU) as measured on the VerifyNow assay, which relies on photometric measurements of platelet aggregation. Thromboelastography (TEG) with platelet mapping (PM) is an alternative assay that directly measures clot formation and mechanical strength. This study compares the results of PRU to TEG-PM.METHODSPatients with simultaneous or near-simultaneous PRU and TEG-PM results who underwent cervical carotid artery stenting, intracranial stent-assisted aneurysm coiling, or flow diversion at the authors’ institution between August 2015 and November 2016 were identified. PRU results were compared with the TEG maximal amplitude (MA) attributable to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) activity (MA-ADP) as measured by TEG-PM. Platelet inhibition was considered therapeutic for MA-ADP values < 50 mm or PRU < 194. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated, and the sensitivity and specificity of PRU were calculated assuming that the results of TEG-PM reflected the true degree of platelet inhibition.RESULTSTwenty-three patients were identified with a total of 37 matched sets of TEG-PM and PRU. Three of these pairs were excluded due to anemia outside of the PRU manufacturer’s recommended range. The Pearson correlation coefficient for these values was 0.50 (p = 0.0026). The prevalence of clopidogrel nonresponders determined by TEG-PM (9%) matched reported rates (5%–12%); PRU demonstrated much higher prevalence (39%). For detecting a therapeutic level of platelet inhibition, PRU demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.59, specificity of 0.50, positive predictive value of 0.95, and negative predictive value of 0.07. Ideal inhibition was concordant in only 25% of observations in which at least one of the results was ideal.CONCLUSIONSAgreement between TEG-PM and PRU regarding the degree of platelet inhibition is poor. PRU likely overestimates clopidogrel resistance, as 93% of patients with PRU > 194 demonstrate a therapeutic level of platelet inhibition on TEG.

Does i-T744C P2Y12 Polymorphism Modulate Clopidogrel Response among Moroccan Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients?

Background. An interindividual variability in response to Clopidogrel has been widely described in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). The contribution of genetics on modulating this response was widely discussed. The objective of our study was to investigate the potential effect of i-T744C P2Y12 polymorphism on Clopidogrel response in a sample of Moroccan ACS patients. We tried also to determine the frequency of this polymorphism among Moroccan ACS compared to healthy subjects. Methods and Results. 77 ACS patients versus 101 healthy controls were recruited. DNA samples were genotyped by PCR-RFLP method. The VerifyNow assay was used to evaluate platelet function among ACS patients. Our results show that the mutant allele C was more frequent among ACS ST (+) than ST (−) patients (39% versus 19.8%, resp.), when the wild-type allele was more represented in the ACS ST (−) group (80.2%). The C allele frequency was higher among resistant than nonresistant patients (30% versus 20.8%, resp.). Comparison of ACS patients and healthy controls shows higher frequency of mutant C allele among cases compared to controls (22.73% versus 19.31%, resp.); there was a statistically significant association of the recessive and additive transmission models with the ACS development risk (OR [95% CI] = 1.78 [1.58–5.05], P=0.01 and OR [95% CI] = 1.23 [0.74–2.03], P<0.001, resp.), increasing thus the association of this polymorphism with the pathology. Conclusion. Our results suggest that this polymorphism may have a potential effect on Clopidogrel response among our Moroccan ACS patients and also on ACS development.