bone stimulator
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Daniel Pollack ◽  
Matthew A. Diament ◽  
Yelizaveta Kotlyarova ◽  
Yechiel N. Gellman

This report discussed an unusual case of a 23 year old woman with a painful bipartite medial cuneiform, (BMC) and severe arthritic and cystic changes at the partition with no history of trauma. MRI taken confirmed a large cyst with subchondral erosions at the dorsal and plantar segments with significant bone marrow edema. Definitive treatment consisted of arthrodesis on the dorsal and plantar segments using one lag screw, demineralized bone matrix grafting, and a bone stimulator.


2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (7) ◽  
pp. 1383-1390
Author(s):  
Scott Huff ◽  
Joseph Henningsen ◽  
Andrew Schneider ◽  
Fady Hijji ◽  
Breanna Dominguez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0017
Author(s):  
Stephen T. Mathew ◽  
Ryan P. Coene ◽  
Kathryn A. Williams ◽  
Lyle J. Micheli ◽  
Matthew D. Milewski

Background: Recently, bone stimulators have been increasingly used for fracture care, particularly in the context of delayed healing and nonunions. Bone stimulation provides upregulation of osteogenic factors and stimulation of osteoblasts to create new bone. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine if adjuvant use of bone stimulation would improve the rate of healing in the operative management of stable osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee. Methods: Forty patients who presented with a stable OCD lesion of the knee were included in the present retrospective study. All patients were managed with operative intervention with anterograde drilling by a single senior surgeon. The patients in the two groups, those with or without the use of bone stimulators post-operatively, were matched for skeletal maturity, lesion location, gender and age at surgery. The primary outcome measure of the rate of healing was determined from 3 month post-operative MRIs and clinical results were also analyzed. Results: At two years, 36 patients (90%) in both groups went on to clinical healing without further interventions. Two patients in each group required re-operations. The bone stimulator group had a mean decrease of 0.9 (± 1.8) mm in lesion coronal width and had 12 patients (63%) who had overall improved healing as compared to the non-bone stimulator group which had a 0.8 (± 3.6) mm decrease in coronal width and 14 patients (78%) with improved healing (p=0.272). No statistical differences in imaging or clinical healing were found between the two groups. Male patients were seen to have a clinically important decreased time from surgery to sports clearance (4 versus 5.5 months, p=0.063), discharge (7.8 versus 13.4 months, p=0.057), and increased overall healing (81% versus 55%, p=0.187) as compared to females. Skeletally immature patients had a decreased time from surgery to discharge (7.0 versus 18.3 months, p=0.005), improved overall healing (79% versus 50%, p=0.158), and decreased reoperation rate (3% versus 30%, p=0.042) when compared to the skeletally mature patients. Conclusion: In the surgical treatment of stable knee OCD lesions, bone stimulator use did not appear to improve radiographic or clinical healing. However, this study was not powered to examine the clinically important differences between the patients with and without the use of bone stimulators. Further multi-institutional studies will be needed to further elucidate differences. This study did find that skeletally immature patients had improved outcomes both clinically and on imaging as compared to skeletally mature patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Predrag Grubor ◽  
◽  
Rade Tanjga ◽  
Milan Grubor ◽  
Đeri Jugoslav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
George B. Holmes ◽  
Frank Wydra ◽  
Michael Hellman ◽  
Christopher E. Gross
Keyword(s):  

PM&R ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. S364-S364
Author(s):  
Myrlynn Delille ◽  
Junney M. Baeza Dager ◽  
Kresimir Banovac ◽  
Luis Batlle ◽  
Karin Zachow

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 2737-2746 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Shahrabi ◽  
Saeed Hesaraki ◽  
Saeed Moemeni ◽  
Mina Khorami
Keyword(s):  
Sol Gel ◽  

2002 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. 429-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Wang ◽  
Anthony W. Le ◽  
Raymond K. Tsukuda

External fixation was used to reduce or arrest progressive degeneration in 28 patients with Charcot’s foot dislocations. Adjunctive procedures included tendo Achilles lengthening and application of an external bone stimulator. Advantages of using external fixation are that surgeries are usually performed percutaneously and that most patients are weightbearing in 10 to 14 days. There was no incidence of pin tract infection or further foot collapse, with the longest follow-up period being 24 months. The authors propose that use of external fixation with bone stimulation may be an effective alternative method of treating the Charcot foot. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92(8): 429-436, 2002)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document