Does developmental canal stenosis influence surgical results of bilateral open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

Object The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of developmental canal stenosis in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), and the correlation between surgical results and degree of developmental canal stenosis. Methods A total of 112 patients who eventually had surgical treatment for CSM were evaluated. Male patients whose sagittal spinal diameter was < 14 mm and females whose sagittal diameter was < 13 mm even at one level were classified as having developmental canal stenosis. Two groups of patients were used in this study; the “positive” group (57 cases) included patients with developmental canal stenosis preoperatively, whereas the “negative” group (55 cases) excluded such patients. Lateral functional radiographs obtained in patients in the 2 groups were compared for range of motion and clinical results. Results Developmental canal stenosis was found in 50.9% of all cases. Based on clinical results, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Conclusions Patients with CSM showed a high incidence of preoperative developmental canal stenosis. However, there were no significant differences in clinical results between patients with and without this disorder. These results indicate that developmental canal stenosis is not a factor that influences surgical results.

Anterior osteophytectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in developmentally narrow canal

✓ The authors present 19 cases of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients with developmentally narrow canal treated by microsurgical anterior osteophytectomy with interbody fusion, with follow-up periods of 1 to 8 years (mean 38 months). Postoperatively, the lower limb function, evaluated by Nurick's six-grade classification, improved two or three grades in 16 cases, one grade in two cases, and remained unchanged in one case. The upper limb function, evaluated by the authors' own four-grade classification, improved two or three grades in 11 cases, one grade in seven cases, and remained unchanged in one case. No deterioration caused by the osteophytectomy was seen. During the follow-up period, spondylolisthesis appeared 31 months postoperatively in one patient and soft disc hernia occurred 66 months postoperatively in another; these two patients were treated by a second operation and cervical traction, respectively. The authors conclude that anterior osteophytectomy with interbody fusion is applicable as a surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy even where developmental canal stenosis is present.