Can we identify a preferred first-line strategy for sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma? A network meta-analysis

Background: Combinations based on immune checkpoint inhibitors are the new first-line standard treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) has a dismal prognosis but good immunogenicity. Methods: The authors performed a network meta-analysis of Phase III randomized trials of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations versus standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy reporting data for sRCC. The endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival and objective response rate. Results: Five trials comprising 569 sRCC patients (out of a total of 4409 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients) were included. Nivolumab–cabozantinib was the highest ranking treatment for overall survival (p-value = 88%) and progression-free survival (p-value = 81%). Atezolizumab–bevacizumab had the highest rank for objective response rate (p-value = 80%). Conclusion: Despite some limitations, nivolumab–cabozantinib might be the preferred first-line option for sRCC in terms of efficacy.

Feline sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma with peritoneal carcinomatosis and effusion

A 9-y-old, castrated male, domestic medium-hair cat diagnosed previously with chronic kidney disease developed anorexia and vomiting. Ultrasonography revealed abdominal effusion and a left renal perihilar mass. Cytologic evaluation of the peritoneal fluid and mass identified atypical epithelioid cells suspected to be of renal epithelial or possible mesothelial origin. Immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation of a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded peritoneal fluid cell block indicated both pancytokeratin and vimentin expression in the atypical epithelioid cell population. With scanning electron microscopic evaluation, similar epithelioid cells lacked the cell-surface microvilli expected of mesothelium, supporting an antemortem diagnosis of probable carcinoma. On postmortem examination, the left kidney was effaced by an infiltrative neoplasm with myriad similar nodules throughout the peritoneum. The neoplasm was composed primarily of polygonal-to-spindle-shaped cells with strong vimentin and weak pancytokeratin cytoplasmic immunolabeling. Further IHC characterization with PAX8, CK18, KIT, napsin A, SMA, desmin, CD18, and claudin 5 was performed. Histologic and IHC findings supported a diagnosis of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma with peritoneal carcinomatosis. An in vitro cell culture line of neoplastic cells harvested from the primary tumor was successfully established for future research endeavors.

Durable Remission with Immunotherapy in a Patient with Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma

Sarcomatoid differentiation is a rare and aggressive histologic subtype with poor prognosis, seen in several malignancies. In sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the degree of sarcomatoid differentiation and the stage at presentation determines the prognosis. Despite resection, chemotherapy and targeted therapy response is modest, with relapse usually occurring within a few months. We present a case of a gentleman with sarcomatoid RCC managed with pembrolizumab, who has had no evidence of recurrence for over 4 years since the last dose of immunotherapy. RCCs with sarcomatoid differentiation have a high presence of programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed cell death ligand 1 in T cells and tumor cells, respectively, making immunotherapy an attractive option in this setting. Clinical trials are ongoing to further define the benefit of immunotherapy in sarcomatoid RCC.

Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Present and Future of Treatment Paradigms

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) is an aggressive form of kidney cancer that is associated with poor prognosis. It can arise from any histologic type of renal cell carcinoma. The majority of cases will present with advanced or metastatic disease requiring systemic therapy. Nephrectomy is the treatment of choice in locally resectable disease. The therapeutic options for sRCC have evolved in the past decade. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and monotherapy with targeted therapy (VEGF and mTOR) have historically shown poor response rates and survival in the treatment of metastatic sRCC. The use of checkpoint inhibitors and their combination with targeted therapy against VEGF has changed the landscape and outcomes for renal cell carcinoma. Given the rarity of sRCC most of the data on treatment is from small cohorts or extrapolation from larger clinical trials. The benefit from the combination of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy to VEGF has shown promise in the sRCC population in post hoc analysis of large clinical trials. Future research focusing on further characterizing the unique biologic and clinical features of sRCC is critical in advancing the knowledge and developing effective therapy to improve clinical outcomes and survival.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in advanced sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC): A multicenter study.

4568 Background: Advanced sRCC is an aggressive disease with limited responsiveness to chemotherapy and VEGF-targeted therapies. Subgroup analyses from randomized trials showed improved outcomes with ICI, though sample sizes were relatively small. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (pts) who had RCC with any sarcomatoid component and received systemic therapy for advanced disease. The pts were classified into ICI+ and ICI- groups (gp) based on whether they had received ICI in any treatment line. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the initiation of first systemic therapy. Time to ICI failure (TIF) was defined as the interval from initiation of ICI to subsequent therapy or death. Survival distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between covariates and survival was analyzed using multivariate Cox regression. Two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 203 pts from 6 US academic cancer centers met the inclusion criteria – 155 in ICI+ gp and 48 in ICI- gp. Overall, 137 (67%) pts were male and 181 (89%) were white; median age at mRCC diagnosis was 59.7 (IQR 52.4-67.7) years; 129 (63%) pts presented de novo with distant metastases, 154 (76%) had clear cell (CC) histology, and 182 (90%) had intermediate/poor risk by IMDC criteria. ICI+ had a higher proportion of purely CC tumors (81% vs 64%, P =.02); other demographic and clinical features were similar between the two gps. After a median follow-up of 48.1 (95% CI 40.7-55.5) months (mos), median OS and response rates were significantly higher in the ICI+ gp (Table). OS benefit, compared to ICI-, was maintained in pts who received ICI in ≥ second line (39.6 vs 7.6 mos, HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.51, log-rank P <.001). TIF was comparable between pts treated with ICI upfront vs in ≥ second line (6.0 vs 5.3 mos, HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.87-1.85, P =.21). On multivariate analysis, ICI- (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.61-3.88, P <.001), non-CC histology (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.98-5.00, P <.001) and sarcomatoid component ≥20% (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.28-2.90, P =.002) were predictive of all-cause mortality. Among pts with non-CC or mixed histology (n=45), ICI+ had higher OS (18.0 vs 5.5 mos, HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.44, P <.001) and ORR (44% vs 12%, P =.03), compared to ICI-. Conclusions: Treatment with ICI led to markedly higher survival and response rates in advanced sRCC. OS benefit was maintained with ICI in the second line and beyond. Significant benefit was also noted among pts with non-CC or mixed histology sRCC.[Table: see text]