Correction to: The Effectiveness of Two Methods of Prescribing Load on Maximal Strength Development: A Systematic Review

While typesetting the entries of the Table 1 were incorrectly aligned. The correct Table 1 has been copied below.

Correction to: Recommendations for performance optimizations when using GATK3.8 and GATK4

Following publication of the original article [1], the author explained that Table 2 is displayed incorrectly. The correct Table 2 is given below. The original article has been corrected.

Corrigenda: New occurrence records for stygobiontic invertebrates from the Edwards and Trinity aquifers in west-central Texas, USA. Subterranean Biology 28: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.28.29282

It has come to our attention that in Table 2, four records of Cirolanides sp. were mistakenly labeled as having been catalogued in the University of Texas Insect Collections (UTIC), when in fact they are catalogued in the Aquifer Biology Collection at the Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center at Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas. All other information about the specimens is correct. The CORRECT Table is as follows:

Erratum: Zalameda, J. et al. Detection and Characterization of Damage in Quasi-Static Loaded Composite Structures using Passive Thermography. Sensors 2018, 18, 3562

The authors wish to correct Table 3 in their paper published in Sensors [...]

Erratum to: Multi-Venue Self-Exclusion for Gambling Disorders: A Retrospective Process Investigation

Erratum to: Multi-Venue Self-Exclusion for Gambling Disorders: A Retrospective Process Investigation Originally published in JGI Online First section, Issue 38, Month 2018 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/xxx-xxxx-xxThere were errors in several values listed in Figure 5 under the subheadings “Abstinent” and “Non-abstinent.” Further, the order of these subheadings was reversed. The correct table is shown in the current version of the manuscript.Corrected version may be found in JGI, Issue 38, May 2018 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4309/jgi.2018.38.7

Erratum

Mayer KH, Loo S, Crawford PM, et al. Excess clinical comorbidity among HIV-infected patients accessing primary care in US community health centers. Public Health Rep. 2018;133:109-118. (Original DOI: 10.1177/0033354917748670) In the above referenced article, Table 3 was published with duplicate information in the initial OnlineFirst version. The correct Table 3 is given below. The article, as published in volume 133, issue 1, reflects the corrected table. [Table: see text]

Erratum

Wagner, J., Luyster, R.J., Moustapha, H., Tager-Flusberg, H., and Nelson, C. A. (2016). Differential attention to faces in infant siblings of children with autism spectrum disorder and associations with later social and language ability. International Journal of Behavioral Development. Epub ahead of print. doi: 10.1177/0165025416673475 Owing to errors made by SAGE, the above mentioned article, first published online on November 8th 2016, contained errors. SAGE apologises to the authors and to the readers. The following corrections apply: Line 6 of the article abstract originally read ‘For time scanning faces overall, HRA- and LRC showed similar patterns of attention, and this was significantly greater than in HRA-.’ This has been corrected to read ‘For time scanning faces overall, HRA+ and LRC showed similar patterns of attention, and this was significantly greater than in HRA-.’ The last line of the caption for Figure 2 originally read ‘Error bars are + standard error to the mean.’ This has been corrected to read ‘Error bars are +/- standard error to the mean.’ The formatting of Table 2 was incorrect. The correct table is presented below: [Table: see text] These corrections have been made in the most recent online version of the article, and will also be included in all subsequent versions of the article online and in print.

Beyond conflicts

This paper sets out to investigate the issues leading parents to engage in argumentative discussions with their children during mealtimes. Within a data corpus of 30 video-recorded meals of 10 middle to upper-middle-class Swiss and Italian families with a high socio-cultural level, 107 argumentative discussions between parents and children aged from 3 to 9 years old were selected. The approach for the analysis is based on the pragma-dialectical ideal model of a critical discussion. The results show that family argumentative discussions unfold around issues that are generated both by parental prescriptions and by children’s requests. The parental prescriptions largely concern context-bound activities such as having to eat a certain food or the teaching of correct table manners. The issues triggered by children’s requests refer to a wide range of activities, mainly related to the activity of mealtimes but also related to the children’s behavior outside the family context. These results indicate that argumentative interactions between parents and children are not mere conflictual episodes that must be avoided, but they essentially have a broader educational function.

THERAPY IN ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Etomidate in the management of hypercortisolaemia in Cushing's syndrome: a review

The authors apologise for the publication of an error in Table 2 of this article published in the European Journal of Endocrinology 167 137–143. They wish to make clear in Table 2 that they are stipulating the dose of etomidate and that the corresponding dose of hydrocortisone for complete blockade should be 0.5–1.0 mg/h. The correct table is published in full below.Table 2Treatment of hypercorticolism with etomidate: Recommendations.Infusion rate optionsBlockadeCortisol levelBiochemical monitoringOtherEtomidate (IV) 0.04–0.05 m/kg per h=2.5–3.0 mg/hPartial to complete depending on clinical circumstance of the patientTitrate to serum cortisol 500–800 nmol/l in physiologically stressed patient, 150–300 nmol/l in non-physiologically stressed patientPotassium level Cortisol levelSedation scoring initially every two hours then every 12 hours after first 24 hoursHydrocortisone IV 0.5–1.0 mg/hComplete (will need steroid replacement)<150 nmol/lPotassium level Cortisol levelThis table could now be used as a practical guide for clinicians commencing infusions on the ward of etomidate and required hydrocortisone replacement.

Patient understanding and impression of hematology/oncology fellows.

9 Background: Hematologists/oncologists spend years training in a fellowship program. At academic centers, patients receiving treatment are often seen by fellows. It has not been established what patients understand about fellowship training, therefore our purpose was to explore their understanding and if they are content with fellows taking part in their care. Methods: At West Virginia University/Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center we drafted a survey. This anonymous and voluntary survey abstracted patient data that included: age, sex, race, level of education, type of cancer diagnosis, amount of time being treated for cancer, experience being cared for by fellows and basic knowledge of a hematology/oncology fellowship. Multiple-choice questions were drafted with 4 to 6 answer choices with no option for unknown. Surveys were collected over a three-week period from July 3, 2012 through July 24, 2012. Patients were surveyed at outpatient appointments, infusion center visits, and laboratory draws. Results: 226 surveys were collected. Statistical analysis was performed and a binomial regression was fit to the data. There is evidence that higher levels of education are more likely to give correct answers (p value 0.035). Patients who stated they had not seen a fellow or were unsure they had seen a fellow were more likely to select incorrect answers (p value 0.001). There is no statistical significance differentiating between cancer types in likelihood of getting answers correct (Table). 1.77% of those surveyed felt they completely understand the role of a fellow in their care, while 84.51% desired further information about fellows. Only 2.21% disliked having a fellow involved in their care. Conclusions: Patients at academic centers being seen by hematology/oncology fellows appear to have a lack of knowledge of a fellow’s role and background but have a desire to be educated. Educational initiatives can be introduced to teaching institutions to help patients better understand the role of a fellow. [Table: see text]