Successful salvage via re-osseointegration of a loosened implant in a patient with transtibial amputation

Case Description: Osseointegration is a relatively new technique for prosthetic limb attachment that offers various improvements for patients with amputation and facilitates joint preservation. We present a case of implant loosening during rehabilitation in a patient with transtibial amputation that was successfully managed through a combination of measures, aiming to promote re-osseointegration of the implant. Objectives: Not much is known about structured management of adverse events after osseointegration. Septic or aseptic loosening is currently regarded as implant failure, prompting removal and possible re-implantation at a later stage. The objective of this case report was to evaluate the feasibility of salvaging a loosened implant. Study Design: Case report. Treatment: A novel treatment approach was employed to enable renewed osseointegration of the implant. First, the bone-implant interface was disrupted and renewed through axial rotation and distal repositioning of the implant. Afterwards, extracorporal shockwave therapy and antibiotic treatment were administered. Prosthetic rehabilitation was then started anew. Regular follow-up x-rays and clinical evaluations were conducted, including standardized outcome tests. Outcomes: These combined measures led to a successful re-osseointegration of the implant. In a 21-month follow-up, the patient regained a stable and secure gait pattern, using his prosthesis every day for 15 hours and scoring above average on standardized outcome measures. Conclusion: This represents the first report of implant salvage after failed primary osseointegration. As the associated risks of this novel treatment are very low, investigations are warranted to evaluate this approach on a larger scale.

A breast prosthesis infection update: Two-year incidence, risk factors and management at single institution

ABSTRACT Background: Infection following augmentation and prosthetic-based breast reconstruction can cause significant physical and psychological distress for patients. It may delay adjuvant therapies and compromise aesthetic outcomes. The aim of this study is to identify modifiable risk factors for infection and identify common bacterial isolates to achieve optimal outcomes for patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction over a 2-year period. In each case, we documented demographics, co-morbidities, complications and antibiotic use. We reviewed treatments, infectious species cultured where applicable and all outcomes. Results: A total of 292 patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-five patients (19%) developed an infection. Univariate analysis showed a significantly increased infection rate with longer operative times (P = 0.001) and use of tissue expanders (P = 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed drain use and elevated body mass index (BMI) as risk factors (odds ratio [OR] 2.427 and 1.061, respectively). After controlling for BMI, smoking status and radiation, we found an increased odd of infection with allograft use (OR 1.838) and a decreased odd with skin preparation using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl (OR 0.554), though not statistically significant. Forty of 55 patients with infections had cultures, with 62.5% of isolates being Gram-positive species and 30% Gram-negative species. The median time to clinical infection was 25 days. Implant salvage with surgical interventions was achieved in 61.5% of patients. Conclusions: This study identified judicious use of drains and efficiency in the operating room as modifiable risk factors for infections following implant-based breast reconstruction. Prospective trials to analyse techniques for infection prevention are warranted. Implant salvage following infection is a possible end-point in the appropriate patient.