Biomechanical Comparison of UCL Repair Using Suspensory Fixation Versus UCL Reconstruction

Background: Medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) repair is growing in popularity as a treatment for younger athletes with mUCL tears. One of the most recent techniques utilizes a collagen-coated suture tape to augment the repair. The most popular repair technique uses a screw for proximal fixation in the humerus. We present an alternative technique that uses suspensory fixation in the proximal humerus. Purpose: To biomechanically compare elbow valgus stability and load to failure of a novel alternative repair technique with suspensory fixation to an mUCL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen fresh-frozen cadaveric elbows were dissected to expose the mUCL. Medial elbow stability was tested with the mUCL in an intact, deficient—either repaired or reconstructed—state. The repair technique used a suspensory fixation with suture augmentation, and the docking technique was used on all reconstructions. A 3-N·m valgus torque was applied to the elbow, and valgus rotation of the ulna was recorded via motion tracking cameras as the elbow was cycled through a full range of motion. After kinematic testing, specimens were loaded to failure at 70° of elbow flexion. Results: Both ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction and repair restored valgus stability to levels that were not statistically different from intact at all angles of flexion. There was no significant difference in the ultimate torque to failure between repaired and reconstructed mUCLs. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the valgus strength between the mUCL repair with suspensory fixation and the mUCL reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Suspensory fixation is an alternative method for proximal fixation in the mUCL without compromising the strength of the construct.