magnetic centre
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (16) ◽  
pp. 164006 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Hartenstein ◽  
C Li ◽  
G Lefkidis ◽  
W Hübner

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-391
Author(s):  
Akihiko Mizuno ◽  
Naoki Nakamura ◽  
Hiroshi Yoshikawa ◽  
Shinsuke Suzuki ◽  
Kenichi Yanagida ◽  
...  

A new alignment method for Helmholtz coils is proposed. This method is based on a probe, whose axis is the same as the alignment axis. This probe includes one magnetic sensor, whose position is slightly shifted from the probe axis, and which is set perpendicular to the axis. Using this probe, the tilt and shift of the magnetic centre of Helmholtz coils can be aligned to within an order of 0.1 mrad and 0.1 mm, respectively. Moreover, by this method, effects of terrestrial magnetism and tilt of the magnetic sensor can be removed from the measurement. This alignment method is presented along with an estimate of the alignment accuracy of the SPring-8 linac injector.


1985 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 601-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. N. Lukin ◽  
O. P. Teslya
Keyword(s):  

1973 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-262
Author(s):  
R.W. Cobb ◽  
T.A. Hodges ◽  
A.D. Kirk ◽  
R.M. Pearce ◽  
L.P. Robertson

The author had pointed out, several years ago, the law of deviation of a magnetized needle, (either freely suspended or constrained to move in any particular plane,) from its natural position, by the influence of masses of iron in its vicinity. This law was founded on the hypothesis that the iron attracted both the poles of the needle: the position of which, resulting from this action, might be determined by that of an imaginary minute magnetic needle, freely suspended by its centre of gravity, reduced to the plane of revolution. The author had considered this law as fully established from its accordance with experiment; but Mr. Barlow, in a paper which was published in the last volume of the Philosophical Transactions, denies that such an accordance exists, and infers, from the results of some experiments which he made on horizontal needles, having their magnetism unequally distributed in their two branches, that the theory on which the preceding law is founded is fallacious. In opposition to the views of Mr. Barlow, the author contends that the phenomena observed are precisely those which must result from the theory he had himself adopted; and that they tend in no way to support the hypothesis of their being simply the effects of the magnetic power which the iron receives by induction from the earth. The author was also led to suspect the accuracy of another conclusion which had been drawn by Mr. Barlow, namely, that the length of the needle had no sensible influence upon the extent of its deviations. In order to determine this point, he began by ascertaining more scrupulously than had yet been done, the values of several of the elements of the calculation, such as the exact positions of the points where the intensity of the magnetism is the greatest, and also of the point of neutrality, or of the magnetic centre; and he next subjected to a more severe scrutiny a law which had been regarded as established by experiment; namely, that the tangent of the deviation is proportional to the rectangle of the cosine of the longitude, into the sine of the double latitude of the position of the centre of the needle, with relation to the mass of iron as referred to a hollow sphere.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document