current diagnostic criterion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 170-174
Author(s):  
Hafiz Muhammad Khalid Mehmood ◽  
Munazza Yasmeen ◽  
Sumbla Ghaznavi ◽  
Mr. Abdul Waheed ◽  
Miss Nadia Rasheed

ABSTRACT   Introduction:- Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a group of metabolic disorders. Diabetic nephropathy is one of the chronic complications of DM, leading to End stage renal disease (ESRD). A current diagnostic criterion for diabetic nephropathy is measurement of microalbuminuria, which is 30 to 300 mg of albumin/24 hour’s urine or ratio of albumin to creatinine  (ACR) in the range of 30 to 300 mg/g in random urine sample but it shows inadequate sensitivity for the early detection of diabetic nephropathy. Methodology:- This was a comparative cross sectional study, which comprised of seventy five study subjects and were distributed into three study groups with 25 subjects in each group, having age  in the range of 40-50 years.Group-1 comprising controls (without diabetes mellitus),Group-2 contained diabetes mellitus patients with normoalbuminuria. Group-3 composed of diabetes mellitus patients with microalbuminuria. Vitamin D binding protein, urine creatinine and albumin was measured from the urine sample of each study subjects. Determination of creatinine in urine was performed by jaffe method and albumin in urine was determined by immunoturbidimetric method. Vitamin D binding protein was measured by ELISA method. Levels of VDBP and albumin were normalized with urine creatinine and expressed as VDBP creatinine ratio as (ng/mg) and albumin creatinine ratio as (mg/g) in the spot urine sample. Results:-Results of this study showed that level of Vitamin D binding protein was significantly increased in diabetes mellitus in comparison to control subjects. Conclusion:- Our results proposes that urinary vitamin D binding protein levels is likely to become a useful biomarker for the early detection of diabetic nephropathy in diabetic patients which can be helpful in early treatment and will help to manage diabetic nephropathy. ABSTRACT Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a group of metabolic disorders. Diabetic nephropathy is one of the chronic complications of DM, leading to end stage renal disease (ESRD). A current diagnostic criterion for diabetic nephropathy is measurement of microalbuminuria, which is 30 to 300 mg of albumin/24 hour’s urine or ratio of albumin to creatinine (ACR) in the range of 30 to 300 mg/g in random urine sample but it shows inadequate sensitivity for the early detection of diabetic nephropathy .Current diagnostic criterion for diabetic nephropathy (DN) is detection of microalbuminuria, which is 30 – 300 mg/24 hours of albumin excretion in urine or albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) in the range of 30 – 300 mg/g in the random urine sample but, it shows inadequate sensitivity for the early detection of DN. It has been observed that increased excretion of UVDBP is related to tubular dysfunction. This protein is excreted in urine earlier than albumin. Hence it can be used as a tool to early detection of DN in type 2 diabetic patients. Methodology: This was a comparative cross sectional study, which comprised of seventy five study subjects and were distributed into three study groups with 25 subjects in each group, having age in the range of 40-50 years. Group-1 comprising controls (without diabetes mellitus), Group-2 had diabetes mellitus with normoalbuminuria while Group-3 comprised of diabetes mellitus patients with microalbuminuria. Vitamin D binding protein, urine creatinine and albumin were measured from the random urine sample preferably early in the morning urine sample of each study subjects using ELISA, Jaffe and immunoturbidimetric methods respectively. Levels of VDBP and albumin were normalized with urine creatinine and expressed as VDBP creatinine ratio as (ng/mg) and albumin creatinine ratio as (mg/g) in the spot urine sample. Results: Urinary VDBP levels among the three groups were as the highest Median, IQR (Q1- Q3) values were observed in group 3 as 1056 ng/mg,(905 ng/mg – 1215 ng/mg) followed by group 2 as 442 ng/mg,(381.50 ng/mg – 523 ng/mg) and group 1 as 98 ng/mg,(73.50 ng/mg – 149 ng/mg) respectively, and a statistical significant difference was observed among the three groups with a p- value of 0.000. Results of this study showed that level of Vitamin D binding protein was significantly increased in diabetes mellitus in comparison to control subjects. Conclusion: Results suggest that urinary vitamin D binding protein level is likely to become a useful biomarker for the early detection and management of diabetic nephropathy in Type 2 diabetic patients.  


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudruidee Karnchanasorn ◽  
Jean Huang ◽  
Horng-Yih Ou ◽  
Wei Feng ◽  
Lee-Ming Chuang ◽  
...  

To determine the effectiveness of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥ 6.5% in diagnosing diabetes compared to fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 126 mg/dL and 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG) ≥ 200 mg/dL in a previously undiagnosed diabetic cohort, we included 5,764 adult subjects without established diabetes for whom HbA1c, FPG, 2hPG, and BMI measurements were collected. Compared to the FPG criterion, the sensitivity of HbA1c ≥ 6.5% was only 43.3% (106 subjects). Compared to the 2hPG criterion, the sensitivity of HbA1c ≥ 6.5% was only 28.1% (110 subjects). Patients who were diabetic using 2hPG criterion but had HbA1c < 6.5% were more likely to be older (64±15versus60±15years old,P=0.01, mean ± STD), female (53.2% versus 38.2%,P=0.008), leaner (29.7±6.1versus33.0±6.6 kg/m2,P=0.000005), and less likely to be current smokers (18.1% versus 29.1%,P=0.02) as compared to those with HbA1c ≥ 6.5%. The diagnostic agreement in the clinical setting revealed the current HbA1c ≥ 6.5% is less likely to detect diabetes than those defined by FPG and 2hPG. HbA1c ≥ 6.5% detects less than 50% of diabetic patients defined by FPG and less than 30% of diabetic patients defined by 2hPG. When the diagnosis of diabetes is in doubt by HbA1c, FPG and/or 2hPG should be obtained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document